Pay yourself 1st

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,472
142
63
Bowling Green Ky
Enjoyed this article--reminded me a whole lot of someone else from Canada in several aspects --however a bit more on my comprehension level-:)

Investor paid himself first and amassed $1-million by 50

Tony Martin
HEDLEY DIMOCK
Age: 82
Occupation: Semi-retired consultant and author
Portfolio: BCE, Fortis Inc., TransAlta Corp., TransCanada Corp., Manitoba Telecom Services, TD Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, CIBC.
?It?s not what you make that matters, but what you get into your pocket!? Truer words have never been spoken about investing steadily and slowly as a way to accumulate wealth, and they come from Hedley Dimock, who worked for the YMCA making less than $50,000 a year and still managed to amass $1-million by the time he was 50.
How he got rich: Mr. Dimock says just a few simple steps account for his wealth. He began ?paying himself first? when he was 30. ?Each month, we automatically deducted an amount from my paycheque and put it in our savings account.?
Shortly after, he began investing in things that reflected his lifestyle and values, including a piece of land for a summer cottage and a derelict farm he fixed up and later sold. He also made other things he was interested in into businesses, and worked hard to defer whatever taxes he could. For example, he invests in split shares ? dividend-paying stocks that have been separated into a purely dividend-earning portion, and a capital portion. The capital portion is where he puts his money, enjoying not only the leveraged return compared to the underlying stock?s performance, but also tax-friendly growth.
What he discovered: ?It didn?t make as much difference as to exactly what I invested in and how much, as long as I stuck to the plan,? he said. He kept his savings intact and if he did draw on what he had put away, he quickly replaced the money. ?I always had the prior year?s total plus my earnings. And that compound interest over several decades made a big difference.?
How he picks stocks: Mr. Dimock attributes a lot of his success to seeking out stocks that increased their dividend every year. ?I got a list of about 10 or 12 that I stuck with.? That list included a number of utilities, as well as all five big banks.
<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%" sizcache="3" sizset="22"><TBODY sizcache="3" sizset="22"><TR class=header sizcache="3" sizset="22"><TD sizcache="3" sizset="22">
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
How he stayed rich through the recession: Simply put, he did nothing. ?Everybody said, ?Ditch the banks! They?re going broke!? I looked at our banks and I said two things. One, I do not think our banks are going to go bankrupt or have serious problems. Two, there?s always a double-edged sword.? In short, he asked himself what he would buy instead, and the answer was nothing. So he held all his bank shares, which together are his single largest investment, and enjoyed their strong recovery.
Best move: He said his all-round best move has been holding all the banks, as well as bank split shares. Second-best is one particular investment, Bank of Nova Scotia, along with pipeline powerhouse Enbridge Inc. ?I?ve held it for at least 10 years, and during the recession it hardly moved.?
Worst move: He said worst move was Seamark Asset Management Ltd, a Halifax-based investment service. He bought the stock seven years ago at its high-water mark, after which it went steadily down. Shares ceased trading last January, when the firm became a wholly owned subsidiary of Matrix Asset Management Inc.
Advice: ?Stick to your plan. Pay yourself first, and don?t get excited or nervous about the market?s movements up and down.?
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
in general good to have a flow of income come in:

the stocks listed in the article: some trade in the US

BCE 5.53% 31.45cdn.
they will probably increase the div, more smartphones coming and good management, I say that everytime, this time it is true.
neg: new competitors, time will tell.
the group rogers, telus, bce will trade as a group...low growth...bce div is safe.

FTS: 3.83% 29.25
Fortis has increased their div for over 50 years, just a boring utility that give you 4-8% every year, counting div..., bought some at 24-26, long term holding. just a good stock, would like a pullback.

TA 5.57% 36.33
utility that is big on coal, and that might be a problem, carbon tax?? they are getting into clean projects...not bad do not own.

TRP 4.40% 36.33
TRP is boring but a good pipeline, gives you a 4% yield and the div will be increase over time...yes boring but good.

MBT 9.41% 27.63
I would not own this stock with other peoples money, they are not earning the div, so it will be cut, just no reason to be there, do not like companies that take on debt to keep paying the div. AVOID AVOID AVOID.

TD 3.34% 73.16
look the yield is low and the cdn. banks look expensive compared to some past metrics, but they will increase the divs, own this bank...would buy in slowly, another great long term holding.

BNS 3.80%
you want a chicken way of playing emerging markets in the financial sector, well guess what, great retail operation and exposure to South America, Mexico, and a little in Asia.

BMO CM 4.45% 4.93%
both of these cdn. banks dropped the farthest and generally consider slightly weaker, however they have greatly improved the reatil banking side, and earnings have beaten expectations the past year.

own both in a drip/spp the last 15 years.

split shares are worth checking out, some have leverage, some 2-1, and others can be as high as 3-1 5-1, so must be carefull.

also check volume.

the prefererred might be also worth a look, splits.

should note: hate preptual preferreds though know some who love them, believe people will get crushed on these.

thanks
selkirk
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
DTB boring is always good in investments..., many times when asked about what stock I would like, would suggest something like trp, and say counting the div...could make 10%
+ that is when they lose interest.

a good portfolio should be full of stocks that have a good track record, have a decent rising div, and have allowed investors to profit in the past, ie. there are many so called blue chip stocks that have given investors no return over 10 years, why bother.

thanks
selkirk
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top