Saw this on another site.......so no credit to me. Its little pieces of information like this that I wish someone who believes the government line on 911 could explain it to me.......
any takers welcome...........
educate me............
It is physically impossible for an airliner to cause the WTC towers to collapse straight down.
I did a search on this thread for the word "tons" and it was not mentioned.
We are talking about a building 110 stories tall. Didn't the people who designed it have to figure out how much steel and how much concrete to put on every level of the building? The buildings stood for 28 years so they must have gotten it somewhat correct.
We should have had a table telling us the number of tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the building and the maximum load each level could hold within 6 weeks of 9/11. It has been 6 years. Do you know how many tons of steel were on the 80th floor of the south tower? How can you figure out if it is reasonable to think the fire could weaken enough steel in 56 minutes if you don't even know the quantity of steel? Some nitwit at the NIST is saying the building is 70% air by volume. Buildings are constructed to produce usable space and they stood for 28 years with that much space. It is the 30% that must be specified.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/cons-flash.html
Even if the plane could cause the upper floors to collapse how could they stay centered on the lower floors as they fell? There had to be more steel and concrete as you go down the building. Every level had to support the combined weights of all levels above it. There should have been a stub of the building left with debris from the upper floors to one side.
If the plane could do this then every engineering school in the country should confirm it. The laws of physics don't give a damn about conspiracies.
any takers welcome...........
educate me............
It is physically impossible for an airliner to cause the WTC towers to collapse straight down.
I did a search on this thread for the word "tons" and it was not mentioned.
We are talking about a building 110 stories tall. Didn't the people who designed it have to figure out how much steel and how much concrete to put on every level of the building? The buildings stood for 28 years so they must have gotten it somewhat correct.
We should have had a table telling us the number of tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the building and the maximum load each level could hold within 6 weeks of 9/11. It has been 6 years. Do you know how many tons of steel were on the 80th floor of the south tower? How can you figure out if it is reasonable to think the fire could weaken enough steel in 56 minutes if you don't even know the quantity of steel? Some nitwit at the NIST is saying the building is 70% air by volume. Buildings are constructed to produce usable space and they stood for 28 years with that much space. It is the 30% that must be specified.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/cons-flash.html
Even if the plane could cause the upper floors to collapse how could they stay centered on the lower floors as they fell? There had to be more steel and concrete as you go down the building. Every level had to support the combined weights of all levels above it. There should have been a stub of the building left with debris from the upper floors to one side.
If the plane could do this then every engineering school in the country should confirm it. The laws of physics don't give a damn about conspiracies.
