PLAY OF THE YEAR

[MattMurphy]

Penn St -7 (120)
This line is low for the two reasons. The cold, windy weather could be a factor and the bookmakers love Kinnick.
Penn State is too good for Iowa to hang with. This should be a blow out, Penn State winning 42-3.

 

[3 Seconds]

Miss State College much???

42-3, yet you buy the hook? :shrug:

 

[ROQQIN RIQ]

PSU.........LOSER :mj07: :142smilie

 

[Woodson]

:shrug: :kiss: kurby :director:

 

[3 Seconds]

I thought this was a 42-3 blowout?

Never bet w/ your heart my man. Tough pill to swallow but hopefully you learn for it.

 

[TeeMo]

I thought this was a 42-3 blowout?

Never bet w/ your heart my man. Tough pill to swallow but hopefully you learn for it.

Best advice available......... don't do it.......:nono:

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

I thought this was a 42-3 blowout?

Never bet w/ your heart my man. Tough pill to swallow but hopefully you learn for it.

:Texas will win this game by double digits.

Tech D may not force one single punt the entire game.

:shrug:

 

[3 Seconds]

:shrug:

You are always trying to get me it seems...:nono:

BIG DIFFERENCE

That was just my opinion on the game, not my play of the year. I didnt even place a wager on the game.

Said never BET w/ your heart, not have an opinion on your team w/ your heart....I learned my lesson long ago.

Sorry try again....:sadwave:

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

Trying to get you?

Just wondering how throwing the loss in the guy's face is helping matters? You guys are all patting yourselves on the back and I can't see anyone in this thread on Iowa.

Not sure what the point is, but if it makes you all feel better . . . carry on

 

[3 Seconds]

Trying to get you?

Just wondering how throwing the loss in the guy's face is helping matters? You guys are all patting yourselves on the back and I can't see anyone in this thread on Iowa.

Not sure what the point is, but if it makes you all feel better . . . carry on

So I am throwing it in his face, by saying I hope you learned a lesson? So you figure you would try & throw something in my face.....which ended in failure.

Who the fuck are you, the forum police? Why dont you say something to Wood or Teemo if that is what you, defender of all, were trying to do....why single out me?

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

I thought this was a 42-3 blowout?

Let me know where the advice was in this line

 

[3 Seconds]

Let me know where the advice was in this line

The advice followed that line...why cut it off?

Why not answer the rest of the questions....why single me out & the two posters prior who offered nothing constructive at all....& just laugh at the guy.

& if you think I am wrong since when do 2 wrongs make a right? So I guess your equally as wrong, so why dont you call our yourself?

& when did you become the forum police & defender of all?

Anwer those questions BBC.

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

The advice followed that line...why cut it off?

Why not answer the rest of the questions....why single me out & the two posters prior who offered nothing constructive at all....& just laugh at the guy.

& if you think I am wrong since when do 2 wrongs make a right? So I guess your equally as wrong, so why dont you call our yourself?

& when did you become the forum police & defender of all?

Anwer those questions BBC.

1.)I guess being a prick and a hippocrite irritates me more than just being a prick. Roqqin Riq is also prick, but I'm not certain that he's a hippocrite - I am with you.

2.)Bashing a basher isn't bashing

3.)Since 2000

now, please let me know what the point of the "I thought it was going to be 42-3?" phrase was

 

[3 Seconds]

1.)I guess being a prick and a hippocrite irritates me more than just being a prick. Roqqin Riq is also prick, but I'm not certain that he's a hippocrite - I am with you.

2.)Bashing a basher isn't bashing

3.)Since 2000

now, please let me know what the point of the "I thought it was going to be 42-3?" phrase was

So I am a prick & hippocrite huh? I am still waiting to find out how I am a hippocrite...sense I the example you used failed in its attempt to prove me one.

Being a prick is a matter of opinion & you are entitled to yours....

The point of the line you have questioned is simply that it was so outlandish & obviously heart based so to speak that I called it out & then followed to offer advice to make my point.

Why dont you call Woodson a prick too then BTW? Is it ok if one of your buddies does it?? That sir, is proof of being a hippocrite.

So how do you enjoy being a hippocrite?? :shrug:

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

Woodson's post is in response to Roqqin Riq, dipshit

 

[3 Seconds]

Woodson's post is in response to Roqqin Riq, dipshit

& you know this how? I see zero evidence of such.

Way to ignore the rest of the post....seeing a pattern develop here. Pick out what you want & ignore the rest.

Think you can end w/ the name calling or is that to adult for you?

 

[BobbyBlueChip]

What am I ignoring? - I answer your questions and then you've got 5 more. You were out of line - you know it.

Maybe the next time you want to post something shitty and rub someone's nose in a loss - just don't

 

[3 Seconds]

What am I ignoring? - I answer your questions and then you've got 5 more. You were out of line - you know it.

Maybe the next time you want to post something shitty and rub someone's nose in a loss - just don't

Bottom line is I wasnt bashing the dude.....

I was simply pointing out his foolishness & then offer true advice w/o any ill intentions so to avoid it in the future.

Re-read it if you need to....maybe you jumped the gun a bit jumping down my throat & going on w/ the name calling...

Whatever this is silly...I am done w/ it. Think what ever you want....we will simply disagree.

Cheers....:toast:

 

[hawkeye]

oops--Go Hawkeyes!