Prop Play For Thursday Night Game ..... Straight From Minnesota

Northern Star

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2005
656
19
18
I think this is going to be a high scoring game. With that said I want to take players against Raiders defense. They rank 25th in both passing and rushing yards allowed. Not good.

I am going with Ekeler over 100 yards rushing and receiving in the game. He has 145 against Atlanta, 68 against a good New England defense and they got blown out (just a weird game) and 129 against Buffalo since coming back. With Raiders weak defense he should hit these numbers.

I am also taking him over 5.5 receptions. His last three games for targets and receptions were 9/9, 9/4 and 16/11. Good enough for me. So hopefully he sees the ball tonight.

As Always good luck

Northern Star
 

Northern Star

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2005
656
19
18
The injury report I looked at didnt have him questionable. My bets are in and I am running with it. Just an FYI.

Northern Star
 

UMRebel

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,272
21
38
MS
I?m in North!

I?m adding Waller over 6 rec -135 3x

I got over 6 rec -145 for Ekeler -145 3x

Over 110.5 -145 3x

Their speedster WR is out. More catches towards the Waller!
 

Northern Star

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2005
656
19
18
I played Vegas over 1/2 fg first quarter plus 230 ....winner they had kicked 26 FG on the year and Chargers have given up 23.

Also played Alghor over 56 yards......not going to help if Carr is out for the game.

Northern Star
 

UMRebel

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,272
21
38
MS
Rebel did you play Orlando under after the third quarter?

Missed it bc getting ready for work. I would have. It qualifies for our angle. 🤬🤬🤬

Detroit/wash was a good under play too bc they don?t have good offenses.
 

UMRebel

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,272
21
38
MS
Why the hell we didn?t play Henry on receptions?!? Damn it! I totally forgot about him. I would have if I remembered.
 

Northern Star

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2005
656
19
18
Missed it bc getting ready for work. I would have. It qualifies for our angle. 🤬🤬🤬

Detroit/wash was a good under play too bc they don?t have good offenses.

You will have to go over what you look for so I totally understand it.

Thanks
 

Northern Star

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2005
656
19
18
Why the hell we didn?t play Henry on receptions?!? Damn it! I totally forgot about him. I would have if I remembered.

I had a line of 4.5 receptions and he is 5-8 covering the over 4.5 on the season. Last game against Raiders he had 4 so I passed on him
 

UMRebel

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,272
21
38
MS
I played under in the Dallas game live in 3rd quarter under 137.5 -115 3x. Would have won easily but OT killed it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top