Why are Rams only -3 ? Hawks missing top 2 receivers - D Jackson and Engram. Plus, the Rams owns Seattle. Also the Rams are at home, where they kick a**.
what gives?
what gives?
Rams/Seahawks
- Thread starter puckfan
- Start date
I was just about to post the same thing. I hopped on STL -3 today. I can only imagine this line will go up closer to game time...
Seattle WRs (SEA) Despite doubtful status, (Darrell Jackson & Bobby Engram), neither will play Sunday at St. Louis, coach Mike Holmgren said. Without Jackson and Engram, the team's receiving corps in St. Louis will be made up of Joe Jurevicius, D.J. Hackett, Peter Warrick and Jerheme Urban. Holmgren hasn't decided which two will start in place of Jackson and Engram. Yesterday, Jurevicius and Hackett practiced the most with the first unit on offense, with Warrick and Urban working with the second-team offense. (Seattle Times)
Seattle WRs (SEA) Despite doubtful status, (Darrell Jackson & Bobby Engram), neither will play Sunday at St. Louis, coach Mike Holmgren said. Without Jackson and Engram, the team's receiving corps in St. Louis will be made up of Joe Jurevicius, D.J. Hackett, Peter Warrick and Jerheme Urban. Holmgren hasn't decided which two will start in place of Jackson and Engram. Yesterday, Jurevicius and Hackett practiced the most with the first unit on offense, with Warrick and Urban working with the second-team offense. (Seattle Times)
i think the rams will have a hard time stopping alexander, and he'll get the ball a lot as will j stevens over the middle...no reason these guys won't trade points all the way through...they always do...seahawks have a major revenge factor...and with all of the injuries, shouldn't this line be higher???? the bookmakers know something and won't let us win whatever we want to on the rams!
