RCMP project to help keep dangerous refugees out of Canada

[Skulnik]

A $16-million RCMP project to help keep dangerous refugees out of Canada has turned out to be an expensive security flop.

An internal evaluation says the screening project delivered information too late, strayed beyond its mandate, and in the end did almost nothing to catch refugees who might be linked to criminal or terrorist groups.

Meanwhile, 30 Mounties were tied up for four years on duties that did little to enhance Canada's security.

FedElxn Conservatives 20150909
Then prime minister Stephen Harper said in Welland, Ont., on Sept. 9, 2015, that Canada needed to proceed cautiously in taking in refugees from war zones because they had to be properly screened for criminal and terrorism links. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

"The current approach does not appear to provide much by way of relevant information to support the admissibility screening of refugee claimants," concludes the Sept. 29, 2015, report, obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act.

The report on the anemic results was completed at about the same time as then prime minister Stephen Harper said Canada had to proceed cautiously in accepting Syrian refugees so that Canada's screening process could weed out terrorists.

"When we are dealing with people that are from, in many cases, a terrorist war zone, we are going to make sure that we screen people appropriately and the security of this country is fully protected," Harper told a 2015 election rally in Welland, Ont.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-refugee-screening-1.3536104

So Canada doesn't know who the hell they're letting into the country? lol

 

[THE KOD]

meantime we have 1500 mth coming into America


this cant be good

 

[Duff Miver]

meantime we have 1500 mth coming into America


this cant be good

So, KOD, do you want to tear this POS down or not? Hint: there are two possible answers - Yes or No.

But of course you and skulnutz are too chicken-shit to answer.

 

[Skulnik]

Duff doesn't know the DIFFERENCE between LEGAL and ILLEGAL, what a FUCKING MORON?

:mj07:

 

[THE KOD]

So, KOD, do you want to tear this POS down or not? Hint: there are two possible answers - Yes or No.

But of course you and skulnutz are too chicken-shit to answer.

I say tear that down


dont let anymore in America for 10 years

Then we can put it back up


maybe

the dirty bitchs

 

[Duff Miver]

Duff doesn't know the DIFFERENCE between LEGAL and ILLEGAL, what a FUCKING MORON?

:mj07:

So, tell us skulnutz, where did our revered [I]Founding Fathers[/I] get their papers?

 

[Duff Miver]

So, tell us skulnutz, where did our revered [I]Founding Fathers[/I] get their papers? From the Native American Immigration Service?

And how did they do background checks in 1880. No telephones, no fax, no internet?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

[THE KOD]

New applications for unemployment benefits sank to the lowest level in 42 years, pointing to continued improvement in the labor market.

Initial claims fell by 6,000 to 247,000 in the seven days ended April 16, the Labor Department said. This is the lowest level since the week of Nov. 24, 1973.


Economists were expecting claims to move higher to 265,000. Some were expecting a pick up in claims due to the strike at Verizon Communications Inc. VZ, -3.32%

Analysts said that the The average of new claims over the past month fell 4,500 to a seasonally adjusted 260,500, also close to postrecession lows, the department said.

The four-week average smooths out sharp fluctuations in the more volatile weekly report and is seen as a more accurate predictor of labor-market trends.

The low level of claims is also a sign the U.S. economy was still adding jobs in April at a healthy clip. Low claims usually correlate with strong employment reports.

Some analysts cautioned against reading too much into the data, saying the early Easter continues to distort the seasonal adjustments.

Still, claims are running at levels consistent with robust 200,000 monthly gains in nonfarm payroll employment, said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.

Also read: Most new jobs in U.S. are not crummy

The scarcity of layoffs and steady rate of hiring is at odds with weak gross domestic product. GDP is expected to decelerate in the first quarter from an already tepid 1.4% rate in the fourth quarter.

In addition, there was a negative sign from the factory sector as the Philadelphia Fed?s manufacturing index sank back into contraction territory after improving in March.

See: Philly Fed factory index plunges to -1.6 in April

Gus Faucher, deputy chief economist of The PNC Financial Services Group, said the dichotomy between the two economic indicators is that there is a ?sectorial component? to the expansion.

Strength is concentrated in consumer services and construction, while manufacturing is a little soft, he said.

Jim O?Sullivan said the continued improvement in the labor market, along with a pickup in core inflation, would lead to more Federal Reserve tightening ?soon - but not next week.?

Fed officials will meet on April 26-27 to plot monetary policy. They are widely expected to hold interest rates steady.

Some 2.14 million people collected weekly unemployment benefits, known as continuing claims, in the seven days ended April 9. That was 39,000 lower compared with the prior week.

......................................

what a great man that Obama

what a great President !

 

[Skulnik]

:00x13

 

[THE KOD]

:00x13

Ronnie

admit the economy and jobs are booming under Obama