Saturday September 29th 2007
yesterday: 2-1 +0.8
September: still up some
ml
rl
totals
parlays & IFs
system picks Jays won?don't know who else was (don't care this point) (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 2-1 yesterday;
system sides
team win% (line)value indicator
Mets 64% (-220)-5
Lad 69 (-181)+4 RL 54 (+116)+7
atl 54 (+101)+4
stl 58 (+106)+9
Phil 67 (-199)even RL 53 (-101)+2
Col 53 (-147)-7 ariz 47 (+145)+6
Tor 69 (-159)+7 RL 54 (+120)+8
det 66 (-159)+4 RL 52 (-101)+1
laa 64 (-141)+5
clev 54 (-121)-1
tex 55 (+106)+6
system totals
fla@Mets un10 65% (-115)+11 --Bucknor is a major over-ump; kills this one
sf@Lad un8 65 (+110)+17 --ump Reed is even
__atl@Hou ov10 64 (-105)+12 --Carlson a slight under-ump; kills this one
stl@Pitt un8.5 69 (-120)+14 --Davis an over-ump, including 21-12 this year; another kill
wash@Phil ov11 65 (+100)+15 --ump Dreckman is even
____ariz@Col ov11 60 (+105)+11 --ump Joyce is even
____det@Cws ov9 60 (+105)+11 --ump Guccione is even
__clev@Kc un9 64 (-110)+11 --B.Welke is a good UNDER-ump (finally a fit)
__tex@Seat un9.5 63 (-115)+9 --Layne a bit of an over-ump; another kill
You'd think that with the score 7-2 after 5 and a half that maybe the Braves and Astros could muster another run or two to give me a sweep for Friday. Oh well?at least the madness off losing seems to have ended.
I've spent great care in coming up with these numbers and think that the final ones posted should be as accurate as I can make them. System sides bounced back Friday with a decent 9-6 mark.
Not much value on the highest calls at present lines (Mets,Dodgers,Phillies,?Jays and Tigers a little more so). Rangers I'm not too sure about; didn't get much off of a hurtin' Weaver.
The blank spots are for games with no current lines so I've left my focus towards those that are actually available. I might or might not fill in the blanks where needed.
Will post picks.
They will be carefully chosen.
GL
yesterday: 2-1 +0.8
September: still up some
ml
rl
totals
parlays & IFs
system picks Jays won?don't know who else was (don't care this point) (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 2-1 yesterday;
system sides
team win% (line)value indicator
Mets 64% (-220)-5
Lad 69 (-181)+4 RL 54 (+116)+7
atl 54 (+101)+4
stl 58 (+106)+9
Phil 67 (-199)even RL 53 (-101)+2
Col 53 (-147)-7 ariz 47 (+145)+6
Tor 69 (-159)+7 RL 54 (+120)+8
det 66 (-159)+4 RL 52 (-101)+1
laa 64 (-141)+5
clev 54 (-121)-1
tex 55 (+106)+6
system totals
fla@Mets un10 65% (-115)+11 --Bucknor is a major over-ump; kills this one
sf@Lad un8 65 (+110)+17 --ump Reed is even
__atl@Hou ov10 64 (-105)+12 --Carlson a slight under-ump; kills this one
stl@Pitt un8.5 69 (-120)+14 --Davis an over-ump, including 21-12 this year; another kill
wash@Phil ov11 65 (+100)+15 --ump Dreckman is even
____ariz@Col ov11 60 (+105)+11 --ump Joyce is even
____det@Cws ov9 60 (+105)+11 --ump Guccione is even
__clev@Kc un9 64 (-110)+11 --B.Welke is a good UNDER-ump (finally a fit)
__tex@Seat un9.5 63 (-115)+9 --Layne a bit of an over-ump; another kill
You'd think that with the score 7-2 after 5 and a half that maybe the Braves and Astros could muster another run or two to give me a sweep for Friday. Oh well?at least the madness off losing seems to have ended.
I've spent great care in coming up with these numbers and think that the final ones posted should be as accurate as I can make them. System sides bounced back Friday with a decent 9-6 mark.
Not much value on the highest calls at present lines (Mets,Dodgers,Phillies,?Jays and Tigers a little more so). Rangers I'm not too sure about; didn't get much off of a hurtin' Weaver.
The blank spots are for games with no current lines so I've left my focus towards those that are actually available. I might or might not fill in the blanks where needed.
Will post picks.
They will be carefully chosen.
GL
Last edited:
