Sen. Specter tells GOP to F- themselves. Joins Dems!

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
WASHINGTON - Veteran Republican Sen. Arlen Specter disclosed plans Tuesday to switch parties, a move that will push Democrats closer to total control of the U.S. Senate.

Specter's switch is a huge boost for President Barack Obama as he tries to advance his agenda on energy policy, health care reform and other issues.

With 60 votes in the 100-seat chamber, Obama's fellow Democrats could stop Republican filibusters ? stalling tactics used to delay or defeat legislation.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here
Specter would give Democrats at least 59 Senate seats. There is one vacancy from state of Minnesota, where Democrat Al Franken holds a narrow lead in a race still being disputed in courts.

Under Senate rules, a single senator can object to consideration of a bill, in which case it takes a 60-vote super-majority to bring a bill to the floor or end debate so a final vote can be taken.

However, there is no guarantee that the Pennsylvania senator will vote with the Democrats on every issue. With the presence of moderate Democrats and contested regional issues, the risk of a fractured caucus is a congressional reality.

"In our caucus we don't have any automatic votes for anything," said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy. "I expect him to be as just as independent as ever."

"Anyone who says the president's agenda can slide right through here is wrong," added New York Sen. Charles Schumer. "But the really good news for us is that the Republican sort of knee-jerk filibuster at every whim cannot happen."

Political philosophy at odds
In a statement, Specter said, "I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans...It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable."

Several Senate officials said a formal announcement could come later in the day or Wednesday. Specter planned a news conference for Tuesday afternoon.

Specter, 79, and a veteran of 29 years in the Senate, is one of a handful of Republican moderates remaining in Congress in a party now dominated by conservatives. Several officials said the White House as well as leaders in both parties had been involved in discussions leading to his move.

Specter faced an extraordinarily difficult re-election challenge in his home state of Pennsylvania in 2010, having first to confront a challenge from his right in the Republican primary before pivoting to a general election campaign against a Democrat.

"I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate," he said in the statement.

"I don't have to say anything to them. They've said it to me," Specter said, when asked in a Capitol corridor about abandoning the Republicans.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
wait, spector is now a democrat.......huh, could have sworn he was one for the last 10 years.

and his bs about the party moving further to the right? he cant be serious........the party is moving CLOSER TO THE CENTER with losers like him being propped up and re-elected...that's been the fking problem with this party, nobody with a spine or conviction, only the conviction for power (a true democratic trait) and now he's shown his true colors as he "has a better chance for re-election" by switching.

what a crock

which is why i say......who gave these senators-congrepeople lifetime passes.....29 years for this guy? the nitwits of penn voted this guy in 5 or 6 times???

get all these people out of there and get new people in there.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,522
217
63
Bowling Green Ky
Actually he little choice if he wanted to remain in congress--as in last election he was far more poplular with Dems than Rebs voters in his state--heres defining article back in March and since was also only one of 3 rebs to vote with Demson stimulus-

Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:15 EDT
Poll shows Specter in serious trouble


Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., really did have good reason to announce Tuesday that he'll vote against cloture for the Employee Free Choice Act -- he needed to stop the bleeding.
Specter has been dogged even more than usual lately by pressure from conservatives, who've always distrusted him and were especially angry over his vote in favor of the stimulus. Now he's facing a very tough reelection fight, in part because former Rep. Pat Toomey, who nearly defeated him in the 2004 Republican primary, is poised for a rematch, and this time Toomey might win.
A Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday showed Toomey with a substantial lead over the incumbent, 41-27. That's despite a relative lack of name recognition for Toomey, as 73 percent of Republicans said they don't know who he is.
"Pennsylvania Republicans are so unhappy with Sen. Specter?s vote for President Barack Obama?s Stimulus Package and so-called pork barrel spending that they are voting for a former Congressman they hardly know," Quinnipiac assistant director Clay F. Richards said in a release accompanying the poll.
Republicans hold Specter in pretty low esteem; he gets a 47-29 unfavorable score from them. He's much more popular with Democrats and independents, however -- 60 percent of Democrats have a favorable opinion of him, as do 41 percent of independents. But the senator has already ruled out running as anything but a Republican in 2010, and the things he'll have to do to win the GOP primary will knock down those high favorable numbers and put him in an even more precarious position for the general election.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I like the guy because of his indepenced. But REB/DEM all of us should not like this. WE don,t like it when congress seems to have grid luck. And this may stop that. But many times it,s better for us all with a little grid lock.
He,s marked now. GOP will throw the house at him in 2010.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
wait, spector is now a democrat.......huh, could have sworn he was one for the last 10 years.

and his bs about the party moving further to the right? he cant be serious........the party is moving CLOSER TO THE CENTER with losers like him being propped up and re-elected...that's been the fking problem with this party, nobody with a spine or conviction, only the conviction for power (a true democratic trait) and now he's shown his true colors as he "has a better chance for re-election" by switching.

what a crock

which is why i say......who gave these senators-congrepeople lifetime passes.....29 years for this guy? the nitwits of penn voted this guy in 5 or 6 times???

get all these people out of there and get new people in there.

So according to you if a guy is doing a dam good job for his state we should have term limits to get him out of the office? This backwards ridiculous logic always amuses me. Here is a thought. How about the guy that challenges the incumbent run a good campaign and beat the other guy with brains? I will vote for him my seventh time Democrat or Republic. Im not some douche bag like u retard right wingers who puts party before the country. I couldn't care less if he switch parties. I know this guy will still keep voting his moderate ways.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Actually he little choice if he wanted to remain in congress--as in last election he was far more poplular with Dems than Rebs voters in his state--heres defining article back in March and since was also only one of 3 rebs to vote with Demson stimulus-

Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:15 EDT
Poll shows Specter in serious trouble


Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., really did have good reason to announce Tuesday that he'll vote against cloture for the Employee Free Choice Act -- he needed to stop the bleeding.
Specter has been dogged even more than usual lately by pressure from conservatives, who've always distrusted him and were especially angry over his vote in favor of the stimulus. Now he's facing a very tough reelection fight, in part because former Rep. Pat Toomey, who nearly defeated him in the 2004 Republican primary, is poised for a rematch, and this time Toomey might win.
A Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday showed Toomey with a substantial lead over the incumbent, 41-27. That's despite a relative lack of name recognition for Toomey, as 73 percent of Republicans said they don't know who he is.
"Pennsylvania Republicans are so unhappy with Sen. Specter?s vote for President Barack Obama?s Stimulus Package and so-called pork barrel spending that they are voting for a former Congressman they hardly know," Quinnipiac assistant director Clay F. Richards said in a release accompanying the poll.
Republicans hold Specter in pretty low esteem; he gets a 47-29 unfavorable score from them. He's much more popular with Democrats and independents, however -- 60 percent of Democrats have a favorable opinion of him, as do 41 percent of independents. But the senator has already ruled out running as anything but a Republican in 2010, and the things he'll have to do to win the GOP primary will knock down those high favorable numbers and put him in an even more precarious position for the general election.

All that crap is just crap. Toomey wasn't beating anyone. It would have been close but Spector would have beat him again. We will see how Toomey does against him if they go one on one. He will get drilled like all these scumbag neocon thinkers. There time is gone. Spector already beat him once. Keep posting ur polls DTB. It seems to give u comfort.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
[/B]
"Pennsylvania Republicans are so unhappy with Sen. Specter?s vote for President Barack Obama?s Stimulus Package and so-called pork barrel spending that they are voting for a former Congressman they hardly know," Quinnipiac assistant director Clay F. Richards said in a release accompanying the poll.
.

Who gives a fuk if this 20 percent of hypocritical Republicans are mad at him? These same shit bags said nothing about the spending for the last eight years. Sounds kinda familiar with the guy who presented this post. A hypocrite to the tenth power. Now all the sudden he along with them are worried about spending. Its almost like this segment of the country thinks everyone is as dumb as they are. DTB go back to the teleprompter and the birth certificate garbage. I think u were making progress with those ones.
 

Blitz

Hopeful
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2002
7,546
49
48
58
North of Titletown AKA Boston
rino_big.jpg
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
So according to you if a guy is doing a dam good job for his state we should have term limits to get him out of the office? This backwards ridiculous logic always amuses me. Here is a thought. How about the guy that challenges the incumbent run a good campaign and beat the other guy with brains? I will vote for him my seventh time Democrat or Republic. Im not some douche bag like u retard right wingers who puts party before the country. I couldn't care less if he switch parties. I know this guy will still keep voting his moderate ways.

yeah. they're all doing a bang up job for their states....kennedy, mccain, spector, pelosi, etc.....anybody who's been a senator for 20+ years needs to go!

if you dont see that they are FAILING at their jobs then you've got the backwards ridiculous logic down pat.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top