Short week in the playoffs

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
7,898
2,564
113
Upstate NY
I was curious about how NFL teams have done in the playoffs on a short week. No surprise, it's not great. Here are some stats.

I only went back over the last 4 seasons. 2021 was the first year they added a Monday Night game in the WC round.

Overall, teams on a short week are 3-6 SU and 4-4-1 ATS. Yes, obviously we're dealing with a small sample size. But maybe the 4th quarter is the most telling. When teams on a short week may be getting tired. The teams on the short week have been outscored in the 4th quarter by a cumulative score of 87-43. That includes the 2 games when the team on short rest outscored their opponent.

Since it's that WC Monday Night game that first made me think about this, I then isolated those teams that played Monday (this year, it's Houston). Teams that won the Monday Night game are 1-4 SU and 2-3* ATS in the Divisional Round. I included the * because last year the LA Rams played Monday and then lost at Philadelphia by 6 (as a 7-point dog), BUT Jake Elliott missed 2 XP that game. So the Rams covering was a bit of an aberration. And here's maybe the biggest stat of all this. The teams that win that Monday WC game have been outscored in the 4th quarter in the Divisional Round 57-19.

We have 3 teams on short rest this weekend. Buffalo and SF both played on Sunday and this week are playing on Saturday. And Houston played Monday. All 3 were on the road last week and again this week, but with the tiny sample size, nothing stands out with that angle.

I may be driving through the Adirondacks late Sunday afternoon, so I won't even get a chance to bet the NE/Houston game live. But DK has lines available for each quarter. NE is -130 on the ML and -0.5 (+105) for the 4th quarter. NE has been a much better first half team this year, but this still looks like a good bet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Missy and BMONEY83

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
7,898
2,564
113
Upstate NY
I took a quick peek at weather this weekend and I saw the wind chill in Chicago will be around 5°at kick off. Not sure the SoCal boys are gonna like that much!
Man, the Bears are so bad, who the hell knows? Maybe their luck will continue. I'm hoping for a middle in that game. Well, I'm heavier on Chicago. My 2 books had surprisingly different opening lines on this game. So I bet LA -3.5 and Chicago +4.5 (for twice as much). Both were -115, but I figured it was worth a shot at that price. I should be home in time for that game, so I'll probably bet LA for the first half and then Chicago in the second half.

I just read that the Bears are practicing outdoors this week to prep for the weather. Without heaters on the sidelines. The sad/funny part? Apparently some of the guys were whining about it.

For shits and giggles, I just went through Stafford's career at Chicago. Definitely not his favorite place to play. He's 5-5 there, all when he was with Detroit. 16 TDs and 14 INTs. Hasn't played there since 2020, so maybe that's completely irrelevant. But he's an old guy with back problems. Frigid temps are probably not ideal.

It's fun, having so much time to completely overanalyze these games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boomer1

boomer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 27, 2008
3,940
1,489
113
Birmingham Al
Man, the Bears are so bad, who the hell knows? Maybe their luck will continue. I'm hoping for a middle in that game. Well, I'm heavier on Chicago. My 2 books had surprisingly different opening lines on this game. So I bet LA -3.5 and Chicago +4.5 (for twice as much). Both were -115, but I figured it was worth a shot at that price. I should be home in time for that game, so I'll probably bet LA for the first half and then Chicago in the second half.

I just read that the Bears are practicing outdoors this week to prep for the weather. Without heaters on the sidelines. The sad/funny part? Apparently some of the guys were whining about it.

For shits and giggles, I just went through Stafford's career at Chicago. Definitely not his favorite place to play. He's 5-5 there, all when he was with Detroit. 16 TDs and 14 INTs. Hasn't played there since 2020, so maybe that's completely irrelevant. But he's an old guy with back problems. Frigid temps are probably not ideal.

It's fun, having so much time to completely overanalyze these games.
What a crazy is if the Eagles had won Sunday afternoon the Rams would have gone to Seattle. I would have given them a great shot to beat Seattle. Better than beating the Bears (imo) and they are favored in Chicago. There was some great games this past weekend. Maybe more of the same this weekend. I’m especially interested in the Denver Buffalo game.
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
7,898
2,564
113
Upstate NY
What a crazy is if the Eagles had won Sunday afternoon the Rams would have gone to Seattle. I would have given them a great shot to beat Seattle. Better than beating the Bears (imo) and they are favored in Chicago. There was some great games this past weekend. Maybe more of the same this weekend. I’m especially interested in the Denver Buffalo game.
I wouldn't rule out SF's chances at Seattle, even on the short week with all the travel. Seattle was better on the road than at home this year. Actually, I think that's been the case for at least a few years now. ATS, anyways. Might just be wishful thinking on my part. Before the season, I bet SF to win the NFC at +900.

I grabbed Buffalo when the lines came out. At -112. Whoops. So Denver is probably a lock. But no way could I bet Bo Nix as a favorite in a playoff game.

Speaking of this past weekend... read an article today... there were 12 4th quarter lead changes. The previous most ever in a single ENTIRE postseason was 10.

Before this year, there had only been four playoff games that had four 4th quarter lead changes. It happened twice this weekend.

Personally, I think it's mostly shitty football. But it sure is exciting!
 
  • Like
Reactions: boomer1
Bet on MyBookie
Top