First, thanks for all the input to the spotlight selection. I am willing to take suggestions for about 30 mins after this is posted on what games the board may want analyzed.
Last night's recap:
CHi-sox -130 W
Cubbies -110 W
OVER 7.5 +110 L
Parlay: Cubs / Over 7.5 L
Cle/Minn UNDER 9 (E) W
Atl/Mon Over 8.5 -120 L
Houston +120 Listed W
Anaheim -102 W
UNDER Bos / Detroit 10 -110 W
Mets +134 W
Overall: 7-3, +4.34
Finally something else to look at,
Some cappers attack baseball by the series. They look at the series and look for value in the series. If they find a team that they think will be at a good price and will win at least ONE game of the series they are about to start, then they bet them in the first game of the series and if they win, they are done. If they lose the bet progressively in game two, and if they win they are done. If they lose they again bet progressively in game three. The hope is that the team they have selected will win once and then they will move on to the next series. Anyway, I have heard many good arguements for and against this theory, and I would like to test this theory, so at the beginning of a series I will pick one that I think has value and will track it.
Back shortly with series to watch and the spotlight selection....
JT
Sneaks
------------------
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
A man is not defined by how he reacts when he wins, but how he reacts when he loses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last night's recap:
CHi-sox -130 W
Cubbies -110 W
OVER 7.5 +110 L
Parlay: Cubs / Over 7.5 L
Cle/Minn UNDER 9 (E) W
Atl/Mon Over 8.5 -120 L
Houston +120 Listed W
Anaheim -102 W
UNDER Bos / Detroit 10 -110 W
Mets +134 W
Overall: 7-3, +4.34
Finally something else to look at,
Some cappers attack baseball by the series. They look at the series and look for value in the series. If they find a team that they think will be at a good price and will win at least ONE game of the series they are about to start, then they bet them in the first game of the series and if they win, they are done. If they lose the bet progressively in game two, and if they win they are done. If they lose they again bet progressively in game three. The hope is that the team they have selected will win once and then they will move on to the next series. Anyway, I have heard many good arguements for and against this theory, and I would like to test this theory, so at the beginning of a series I will pick one that I think has value and will track it.
Back shortly with series to watch and the spotlight selection....
JT
------------------
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
A man is not defined by how he reacts when he wins, but how he reacts when he loses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

