ever heard, 'just pick the winner, and you'll pick the right side'?
if you did that with these teams, you'd be doing pretty decently
these squads... when the cover, they win
when they don't cover, they lose
these teams - if you picked the SU winner, you also had the correct ATS side as well
OAK is 4-3 su, ats
STL 4-3
BUF 3-4
PHI 3-4
MIA 3-4
KC 3-5
HOU 3-5
*CINCY - 8-0 su, 7-0-1 ats^
*PITT -when they win, they cover. 4-0 su/ats. when they lose they push^ 0-4 su, 0-2-2 ats
^ depending of course which lines you have / use
honorable mention -
AZ. cardinals are 3 points away from being in this group. lone blemish 8pt SU win vs balt as 10pt favs. otherwise 5-2 su/ats
CHI. 3.5pt dog cover, loss vs det. otherwise 2-4 su/ats
MIN. late game big run by Peterson covers as dog, in loss against den. otherwise 5-1 su/ats
NYJ. vs pats only game they covered but didnt win. otherwise 4-2 su/ats
SF. 7.5 pts dogs @ giants lone game they lost, but covered. 2-5 su/ats otherwise
if you did that with these teams, you'd be doing pretty decently
these squads... when the cover, they win
when they don't cover, they lose
these teams - if you picked the SU winner, you also had the correct ATS side as well
OAK is 4-3 su, ats
STL 4-3
BUF 3-4
PHI 3-4
MIA 3-4
KC 3-5
HOU 3-5
*CINCY - 8-0 su, 7-0-1 ats^
*PITT -when they win, they cover. 4-0 su/ats. when they lose they push^ 0-4 su, 0-2-2 ats
^ depending of course which lines you have / use
honorable mention -
AZ. cardinals are 3 points away from being in this group. lone blemish 8pt SU win vs balt as 10pt favs. otherwise 5-2 su/ats
CHI. 3.5pt dog cover, loss vs det. otherwise 2-4 su/ats
MIN. late game big run by Peterson covers as dog, in loss against den. otherwise 5-1 su/ats
NYJ. vs pats only game they covered but didnt win. otherwise 4-2 su/ats
SF. 7.5 pts dogs @ giants lone game they lost, but covered. 2-5 su/ats otherwise
Last edited:
