Spread in PLAYOFFS has not factored in outcome

[tball]

i'm sure somebody else has posted this info--though jusin case--i'll go ahead and make note of:

of all playoff games this year--the spread has not come into play for ATS winners.

ie. favorites have won and covered -or- underdog has won outright:--no dogs have covered yet!

WILDCARD
TB - vs Wash: Wash WINS Underdog
NE - vs Jax: NE WINS 28-3 Favorite -7+
Pit - vs CIN: Pitt WINS 31-17 Favorite -3
NYG - vs Car: Car WINS Underdog

Home teams 1-3 (NE)
OU: 1-3 (Pit/CIN o48)

DIVISIONAL
SEA - vs Wash: SEA WINS 20-10 Favorite -9+
+++ this game could be a push or loss, depending if you got a generous wash line +++
DEN - vs Ne: DEN WINS 27-13 Favorite -3+
IND - vs Pit: Pit WINS Underdog
CHI - vs Car: Car WINS Underdog

Home teams 2-2 (DEN, SEA)
OU: 1-3 (Car/CHI o31)

each week it has split with two dogs winning outright, and two favorites covering. in all cases--winner of the game has covered the spread.

i dunno if this trend will continue in conf champs.

in my opinion--i doubt it--though with recent poor run in playoffs--you'd be wise to fade anything coming from me

was curious if anyone else might know if there was a playoff season where spread didnt affect ATS outcome

GLA

 

[pt1gard]

might be true but if i took ML dogs they would both lose by buzzer Fgs