spent an hour or so this am.....lookin at results of 2nd rd. games....went back to 1995....8-yrs. of results....
anyway...heres a couple trends/situations that look very good...
play on any 2nd round underdog that won as a fav. in 1st round but did not cover...
this situation has gone 13-2 last 8yrs.
todays plays are on notre dame and missouri.
keep your eye on this for tomorrow....only applies to 2nd round games.
another that looks decent....
play on a 2nd round double digit fav. who failed to cover as a fav. in 1st round...
went 8-3 last 8-yrs...
todays play would be on ...duke.
both of these seem to make good sense to me...a winning fav. who didnot cover, loses public betting support in 2nd round...especially as a dog....but in 2nd rd. they wake up and play up to their capablities..something like that...write these down, lets see how they do today and tomorrow...use em next year..
gluck,burggh..
anyway...heres a couple trends/situations that look very good...
play on any 2nd round underdog that won as a fav. in 1st round but did not cover...
this situation has gone 13-2 last 8yrs.
todays plays are on notre dame and missouri.
keep your eye on this for tomorrow....only applies to 2nd round games.
another that looks decent....
play on a 2nd round double digit fav. who failed to cover as a fav. in 1st round...
went 8-3 last 8-yrs...
todays play would be on ...duke.
both of these seem to make good sense to me...a winning fav. who didnot cover, loses public betting support in 2nd round...especially as a dog....but in 2nd rd. they wake up and play up to their capablities..something like that...write these down, lets see how they do today and tomorrow...use em next year..
gluck,burggh..
