strong thursday card...hoops plays inside....

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
terps game was kinda weird. 99% of the game was played within the moneyline-to-spread-chalk range. so i never really felt like my +6 bet would do anything but cash, but at the same time, never felt like my terps moneyline had any shot to cash either. linesmaker was pretty damn sharp on that game. but glad terps covered. for thursday, a strong card:

3.5 units.....charlotte (+12) over marquette
2.0 units.....wake forest moneyline (+105) over tech
2.0 units....akron (-1) over miami

briefly:

on charlotte
*niners coming off a convincing, confidence building win
*also, charlotte outplayed marquette in the 1st meeting and just couldnt finish the job at the end. at very worst, theyve got the confidence that they can compete with this team
*significant line swing from 1st meeting. charlotte goes from a -1.5 favorite to a +12 point dog. im a little surprised this line is double digits. i think charlotte plays within the number the entire game- not really threatening marquette for the outright, but just hanging around. they shoot the 3 well enough to always be knocking on the backdoor if need be as well

on wake
*went against em vs maryland, but jumping back on em here.
*even though i dont like going against the unranked favorite system, which is as good a system as there is- i gotta do it here. i DONT buy that wake will be a public choice here, especially with them getting waxed a few days ago vs maryland, and everybody knows tech is nails at home. theres no "public choice" in this game imo. tech has already proven they have one of the strongest home courts in the nation
*having said that, tech didnt have an answer for howard in the 1st meeting and i dont think theyre gonna be able to stop him here either. deacons have been pretty decent on the road as well. they havent really "slipped up" vs the lower tier teams.

on akron
*not really thrilled about the line being -1 here, but ill lay it. just feel like whoever establishes their tempo wins. akron wants the game in the 80's. miami wants the game in the 60's. two completely different teams. zips just with more firepower, and i just dont feel miami will be able to keep up on the road.
 

Nickelback

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,361
0
0
Southwest
gman2,

You just love going against me don't you :p

Its early and ********* only has 54 "votes" in with Wake Forest getting 72% of the action. . . definitely way too early to determine who the public will be on if either side. As long as the high majority is not on GT, that will be fine with me :cool:

Two people I know who will be on this pick with me (since so far you and Big Game are going the other way):

GMoney
Volfan (most likely a 5*)

Gl with your plays
 

FATMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2002
299
0
0
steubenville, ohio
Just the sentence alone "the zips have more fire power" is worth a small play.....................:weed:

GL



p.s. went to akron, just think that statement is funny!!!!!!!!!!
Not trying to be sarcastic
 

Nickelback

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,361
0
0
Southwest
Forgot about not posting links or just the name of the site where I get my consensus info from, but if you look around, I think you'd find the one I'm talking about. . . should be interesting to see which way it goes even though it doesn't really matter to me at this point.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
nickelback:

normally we agree on a ton of plays. certainly no disrespect intended. just feel like wake is the right side here. all of your points in your post are valid. i cant refute em. but just think wake rebounds with a win. a handful of teams that have been dominant home court teams have dropped a home game lately. marquette comes to mind. louisville comes to mind. i just think wake is a little better, even on the road.

gl tomorrow man!

(btw, i know what site youre referencing, dont worry. and youre right, that place is a goldmine for going anti-public sometimes)
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
hellah:

how true your post is, lmao.
for awhile, we agreed on damn near every play, then for the last month we couldnt agree on anything.
good to see were on the same side here.

btw- this stretch coming up for ohio is gonna be REAL interesting.

the play saturday (western michigan i believe)
then the MAKEUP GAME IS SUNDAY at akron (how the hell did the AD agree to a back-to-back scheduling spot)?

and then tuesday theyve got a huge nonconference game vs VIRGINIA.

i was actually gonna think about playing ohio on tuesday vs virginia, but now that they threw in that makeup game on sunday, ohio is gonna have a brutal next 4 days.
 

hellah10

WOOFJUICE
Forum Member
Oct 24, 2001
7,958
0
0
45
Toledo
gman2 said:
i was actually gonna think about playing ohio on tuesday vs virginia, but now that they threw in that makeup game on sunday, ohio is gonna have a brutal next 4 days.

ME TOO!!!! It seems that they only get up for the big games...Like Kent St, Kentucky etc...

I agree with ya though...how the hell did the AD agree to back to back games...beats the hell out of me...at least they are both home games :p
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
also tried this one, but small:

1 unit.....ucsb (-1.5) 1st half over cal-poly
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top