Sunday July 1st

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
Happy Canada Day!
:canada1

Sunday July 1st 2007

yesterday: 6-5 +4.10
April: 122-111 -4.21
May: 180-144 +51.40
June: 176-165 +7.38
2007: 478-420 +54.57
system picks 4-1 yesterday, ending the month on a nice little 6-1 run (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system picks April 30-20 (60%)
system picks May 52-23 (69%)
system picks June 50-37 (57%)
system totals 1-2 yesterday but still on a 6 day run of 11-4
system totals April 45-53 (46%)
system totals May 61-41 (60%)
system totals June 75-40 (65%)

Final 3 months is where this hard work should really start to pay off.
I'm looking for more of what May gave me, for July.
Then it won't seem like "work".

system sides

team win% (line)value indicator

atl 53% (+114)+6
Cin 56 (-108)+4
Pitt 64 (-145)+4
Phil 52 (Kendrick-Pelfrey)
Hou 55 (-129)-2
Cubs 62 (-113)+8
Sf 55 (-129)-2
sd 54 (+107)+5
tb 54 (+131)+10
Nyy 53 (-135)-5
Det 59 (-163)-3
Balt 52 (+130)+8
Bost 52 (-170)-11 tex 48 (+162)+9
cws 60 (-110)+7
tor 55 (-109)+2

system totals

ariz@Sf un8.5 65% (-110)+12 --ump Vanover is even
tb@Clev ov9.5 69 (+109)+21 --Meriwether is a slight over-ump
laa@Balt un9 68 (-130)+11 --Davis is a slight over-ump; sucks?I like this one
tor@Seat un9.5 73 (-125)+17 --Holbrook is an over-ump; pass here


That's a decent way to end the month. Bosox was the only system pick missed and it's still got me shaking my head; shouldn't bitch?hit Brewers, Braves, Giants and Indians. Went 1-2 on totals but hit the big one. Went 1-1 on parlays to pick up almost 1?wow?brings my parlay minus to LESS THAN 18 units for the month. Somebody remind me of that number if I start posting lots of parlays again?I could have cleared 25 units for June if I hadn't parlayed anything. Stunned to be in the plus as it is; this last month was full of bad breaks for me, it seemed. Goodbye Norma June?

Sunday looks like a fine day to take it easy. 10 of 15 calls at 55% or less?lotsa crapshoots on today's board, if you ask me. Braves are a thought the way they're going, but I wouldn't at all be surprised if the Marlins salvage this one with Willis. Tempted (again) to try the Reds Bailey, but I was hoping for dog money on that one. Pirates Maholm has looked better lately and faces a very hittable Bacsik here; I probably would have tried the Nats if Bergmann starts here, but with this matchup it's Pirates or nothing for me; hard to lay this kinda juice with a crappy team using, arguably, a crappy starter, no matter how crappy their opponent. Cubs is my biggest lean, right now; might try a piece there. Shields has looked good against the Indians before, and the D'Rays are really smokin' lefties (OPS .829); I think I've already played the D'Rays 3 times over the past week and have been a loser each time so I'm hesitant to back them here; it is a system call, with that +10 V.I., but a 54% call isn't going to get too much of my money no matter what the line?well?talk to me at +200 but don't expect much from me at +131. White Sox are just barely a system pick also, and I think I like them about as much as I like the Cubs; Garland has done great work vs Royals in his career and this Thomson experiment probably won't pan out the second time around like it did the first; Chisox playing good ball last week or two also?'course?look at their competition (D'Rays, Royals). Orioles are another thought, but again I'm looking at a low call (52%) which doesn't get me too excited.

Totals have a couple of umpire-kills, though Davis (in Balt) might be tolerable to play an under with; probably should just get a 5 or 10% penalty for the under, maybe bringing the call to something like 58-63% for the under; not a sytem total then, because of the umpire, and who wants to lay -130 on a 58% proposition anyway? (57% break-even mark for -130's). Passing in Seattle because of the umpire, too. Giants game under looks maybe worth a shot and Indians game over also.

I probably won't have much more to offer today, save for my picks?I'm going to try and do some updates, now that it's month end. I'm running on fumes right now, as it is.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
umpire alert

umpire alert

Barrett, going at Yankee Stadium, is a good under-ump.

I checked the ump as I like the under, despite it not being a "system total".

System call on the game is UNDER the 9 at 63%.

That's close enough to my 65 minimum for a system total so that any kind of under-bonus for Barrett will push it over that crucial threshold.

I cannot properly construct a sentence tonight.

LMAO

:142smilie

I can get 8.5 at -108, but if I play it I'll take the extra half-run and play
under 9 -135

Crap that's a lot of juice for a total.

Let me play...

Under 9 63% + Barrett bonus (he's only a "good" under-ump, not great like a Hirschbeck or Eddings) of 7% to give me a nice round
70% call on the under 9

that has to include the 9 itself (push %)
let's call it 20% to land on the 9.
(maybe a point or two high, but this is the total the oddsmakers have set, so I'm giving it a high probability)
70 - 20 = 50 times a winner

-135 is 74 cents on the dollar
50 x 0.74 = 37
30 x -1....= -30
---------------------------
...................7% ROI

Not very impressive.
With such a high line I'm only going to get some value if I put it on a parlay maybe, and what was I just saying earlier? There was actually an interesting article on another site about parlays and how stupid they are...I copied the article but haven't read it yet...I know from experience how stupid they are...why the :mj16: can't I learn from experience?

2 70% calls parlayed gives you a 49% chance to hit. I dunno...pay me that +200 and I'll again be spotting value. I think I need to do both Value Indicator AND Return on Investment analysis of any parlay that I play in the future. Enough is enough with that BS.

:SIB

P.S. Notice this turkey says that it's an "interesting article" and yet says he hasn't read it yet?
:com:
:142smilie
:scared
:weed:
:00hour
:weed:
:SIB
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
...okay...

Highest Call (Pirates 64%) parlayed with A's-Yanks under 9.

Where I can get the 9, the Pirates are -150.

Pirates 64% (-150)+4 V.I.
a's@Nyy un9 70% (-135)+12 V.I.

Crap...this one is going to be a bitch (push on 9)...why can't it be 9.5?

32% chance to win both
13% chance to hit Pitt and push 9
30%+(70%x36%)=
55% chance to LOSE

pays +190 to win both,
and 66.6 cents on the dollar for win/push (good omen)

32 x 1.9 = 60.8
13 x 0.666 = 8.658
55 x -1 = -55
--------------------------------
..............14.458%

That's actually not too bad.
What makes it suck is the 55% chance of losing.

I hope I did that right (I think so).
Because of the PUSH factor, I don't even know how to assess the Value Indicator.
+190 to win both, and it hits 32% of the time.
13% of the time you're basically salvaging money,
so 32/87 times is maybe where I should look...
=36% and change

36% (+190)+1 Value Indicator as the break-even mark for +190's is 35% (34.4827...).

I think that's a reasonable assessment.

This play is garbage.

:SIB
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
return on investment for system picks
------------------------------------------------------
(the ECONOMY version)
---------------------------------------------------------
Cubs,d'rays,chisox
----------------------------------------------------------

Cubs 62% (-113)+8 V.I.
--Cubs w/edge at the plate in this one as Brewers prefer lefties
--Marquis rated several points higher than Bush AND Bush has done crappy vs Cubs in past (don't take my word on it--go check it out)
--Bush is a bum, in my opinion; Marquis so-so to decent

-113 is 90.9 cents otd
62 x .909 = 56.358
38 x -1.....= -38
------------------------------
...................18.358%

Gonna get me some of that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

d'rays 54% (+131)+10 V.I.
--d'rays smokin' lefties (OPS>.800)
--d'rays smokin' on the road (OPS >.800)
--despite not being at his best the last few, I've still got Shields rated higher than Lee, and Shields has performed well vs Indians in past

54 x 1.31 = 70.74
46 x -1.....= -46
-------------------------------
....................24.74%

Outta sight. 46% chance of failure bites, though.
I had the D'Rays to beat the Chisox in 3 of 4 there, and they lost all 4, so I dunno...maybe I need to start either giving the D'Rays a penalty BECAUSE there the D'Rays, OR giving a greater penalty for the D'Rays crappy pen (which blew 2 of 3 of the Chisox games) OR paying more attention to the OPS last 7 days...wish I could get vs L/R for last 7 days...
:shrug:
...D'Rays OPS last 7 days is bordering on .700.
AND they didn't look like an OPS .800 club vs lefties Danks and Buehrle; Lee may have a good time, here.

I risk a unit MAX. That's if I'm feeling lucky.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

chisox 60% (-110)+7 V.I. (another one just barely making the grade)
--Garland WAY WAYYY better than Thomson, even in Thomson's best days, which are long gone; Garland has also done stellar work in his career vs Royals

(wow...I just noticed that Danks went 8 innings Saturday...gotta be his longest of the year...by 2 innings!)

--chisox sticks can compete, here

-110 is 90.9 cents otd
60 x 0.909 = 54.54
40 x -1.......= -40
-------------------------------
.....................14.54%

Cubs play looks quite a bit better.
Still...I like Garland to continue his solid year in this one, AND it would not shock me at all to see Thomson fall flat on his face.

Want a piece.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Doesn't look like I'm doing my updates tonight. MLB.com and ESPN.com both refuse to include Saturday's games in their statistics database, so I have to wait until tomorrow anyway.

I'm kind of relieved.
I think the above concludes my number-crunching activities for the evening.
A couple of small plays and then this computer either becomes a jukebox or goes off.

Let's do this Chicago thing!

:SIB
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
You can't get something for nothing. You can't get freedom for free.

You can't get something for nothing. You can't get freedom for free.

PLAYS

system picks

Cubs -113 2.26/2
d'rays +131 0.76/1
chisox -110 1.65/1.5

other picks

Reds -108 0.78/0.72
Pirates -145 1.16/0.8
blue jays -109 1.09/1

totals

stl@Cin un10 +105 0.6/0.63
ariz@Sf un8.5 -110 0.78/0.72
a's@Nyy un9 -135 0.94/0.7


That's plenty for what I (had) want(ed) to be a calm day. I've decided to give a try on the Reds as I'm a sucker for up-and-coming aces, which Bailey might be. Also think that the Pirates can wipe out the Nats here. I've warned before about taking my Jays plays with a grain of salt, as they're my team; I just think that Marcum has been simply outstanding AND consistent?not like that other joker the Jays sport in McGowan; Weaver is like 5-9 vs the Jays with an ERA over 5, so I'm hoping he returns to something like his form from earlier in the season?the play will be fine, then. I won't play the D'Rays for awhile?with Kazmir or whoever?if the D'Rays drop this one?they certainly might?this is a 54% call I'm not too confident it. Trying it as I think that Shields has been okay his past 3 but just needs to keep the ball in the park?might be tough here, granted, but Shields has walked only 1 over those past 3 starts?all losses?and struck out 17; last game alone he walked no Chisox but struck out 11; these numbers suggest to me that we shouldn't stick a fork in him just yet.

As for totals, the 10 at Cinci seems kind of high to me the way Maroth performed for his first NL start, the way the Reds are NOT hitting lefties well, and because of the potential of Homer Bailey; certainly the +105 helped; you can actually get a 10.5 -111 but I suspect it won't get that high; ump Tschida helps here as he's a decent under-ump?has been for years. The other 2 are both system calls, the Yankee total being helped out by ump Barrett, as mentioned elsewhere. System totals were pretty good in May and then really kicked some butt in June so I'm hoping that July brings continuation.

I need to crash.
BIG TIME.
See you tomorrow (today).
GL

:SIB
 
Last edited:

~Buckshot~

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 31, 2005
356
21
18
Salt Lake City, Utah
Ex,

Don't know if you will see this in time, our timing is way off but...

Curious what your system shows on CWS/KC total.

Garland whip 1.10 last 3, 1.16 ytd, Thomson 0.86 in 1 start. CWS bp 3.74 era last 10, KC 2.75 last 10. CWS hitting .227 vs R last 10, .232 ytd, KC .267 vs R last 10 and ytd.

But here's the punchline, Eddings behind the plate.

Absolutely an under play for me, wanted your imput.

Thanks and best of luck always
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,051
137
63
Toronto
Hey Buckshot...I did see this too late.

System had the chisox-Kc at UNDER the 9.5 at 60%.
I would easily give a 10% bonus for an Eddings behind home plate; woulda been a system call.

Usually I do my SP updates after the games are done, which makes it easy to check out the following day's umps.
Yesterday I was too wasted to do my updates.
Thanks for the heads-up though...I'm just sorry I missed it. Woulda hit at least ONE total today (went 0-3).

I almost stuck with just the Cubs and Chisox.
Woulda been a nice day, then.
As it is I'm looking at a -2 or 3 units to start July.
This will improve.

:SIB
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top