going against my best judgment (o/u), as i could not jump on any other dogs, and don't have the time to do the whole card:
s.f. at oak
livan is probably the best parlay this year: against him and the over. but i will skip the parlay and go for the over only, as mulder is trending real bad, so a 6 era meets a (last 4) 5 era and rising, i will take the over 9.5.
cinci at clev.
reitsma's era has been steady throughout the year at around 4, while wright's era is 2.60. so why is the line at 10.5? there is too much of a discrepancy here and i must take the under.
pep
s.f. at oak
livan is probably the best parlay this year: against him and the over. but i will skip the parlay and go for the over only, as mulder is trending real bad, so a 6 era meets a (last 4) 5 era and rising, i will take the over 9.5.
cinci at clev.
reitsma's era has been steady throughout the year at around 4, while wright's era is 2.60. so why is the line at 10.5? there is too much of a discrepancy here and i must take the under.
pep
