Bobby, I think you're misunderstanding me and/or my intentions.
Why would I make a post pointing out it shouldn't count??? Well, this was supposedly an 80+ unit play to win 40+ units, right? And he would have deducted 80 units it they would have lost? Yeah right.
It wasn't posted, he specifically said he wasn't posting it, but then he wants to count it after it wins because he casually mentioned it in one or two other threads. That SF loss he is speaking of was for a couple of units I believe, so it's not hard to swallow that L in exchange for a nice 40 unit win. I'm not complaining, but rather pointing out a very large discrepancy with his record. This isn't the first very questionable thing he has done so it's not like he has an impeccable record in the past. Many people could attest to that, but I won't get into that. Anyhow, I'm not trying to pick on the guy at all. Like I said in my previous post, all I'm getting at is his record is once again very misleading due to some ridiculously large play that this time wasn't even posted. If you'll notice, as the game went on and the Sox were winning, he all of a sudden started talking more and more about it like it was a real play.
It still amazes me that hardly anyone notices or cares about this kind of thing. It's just not fair to those who do keep legitimate records to have some people doing things like this in my opinion. Sorry if my intentions weren't better stated.