SuperBowl Lines....

[AR182]

Compliments of Bookmaker....

SUPER BOWL....POINTSPREADS
MATCHUP.........SPREAD
ATL-NE.............Patriots -7.5
GB-NE..............Patriots -7
ATL-PIT............Steelers -3
GB-PIT.............Steelers -2.5

 

[AR182]

Here is the article where I got them from....

http://www.sportsline.com/insiders/...-ahead-lines-offered-for-title-game-matchups/

 

[DZ]

I saw these from William Hill (in Vegas)...

NE -3.5 vs ATL
NE -3 vs GB
PIT pk vs ATL & GB


These could have moved as they were from Monday.

 

[Old School]

looks like some very good middles for whomever can wager at both sites..

 

[DZ]

5dimes...

5dimes...

Super Bowl LI
teams must meet in Super Bowl LI for action
Sun 1/22 25051 Green Bay Packers -1 -110 -120
3:05PM 25052 Pittsburgh Steelers +1 -110 +100
teams must meet in Super Bowl LI for action
Sun 1/22 25053 Green Bay Packers +3 +100 +150
3:05PM 25054 New England Patriots -3 -120 -170
teams must meet in Super Bowl LI for action
Sun 1/22 25055 Atlanta Falcons +1? -110 +105
3:05PM 25056 Pittsburgh Steelers -1? -110 -125
teams must meet in Super Bowl LI for action
Sun 1/22 25057 Atlanta Falcons +3? -110 +160
3:05PM 25058 New England Patriots -3? -110 -185

 

[DZ]

And for comparison's sake, here's the odds offered by a pph shop I use through a local...well known to the pump up every line on the fav and over by a 1/2 pt. Also, notice the shitty vig.

SUPER BOWL 51 - POSSIBLE MATCHUPS
IF TEAMS DO NOT MEET ALL MONIES REFUNDED

SUPER BOWL 51 - GREEN BAY PACKERS VS PITTSBURGH
STEELERS (IF TEAMS DO NOT MEET ALL MONIES REFUNDED)
Jan 22 13311 G.B. PACKERS -1-120 o53-120 -140
3:05 PM 13312 PIT STEELERS +1-120 u53-120 +110

SUPER BOWL 51 - GREEN BAY PACKERS VS NEW ENGLAND
PATRIOTS (IF TEAMS DO NOT MEET ALL MONIES REFUNDED)
Jan 22 13313 G.B. PACKERS +4?-120 o57-120 +185
3:05 PM 13314 N.E. PATRIOTS -4?-120 u57-120 -235

SUPER BOWL 51 - ATLANTA FALCONS VS PITTSBURGH
STEELERS (IF TEAMS DO NOT MEET ALL MONIES REFUNDED)
Jan 22 13315 ATL FALCONS -1-120 o56-120 -140
3:05 PM 13316 PIT STEELERS +1-120 u56-120 +110

SUPER BOWL 51 - ATLANTA FALCONS VS NEW ENGLAND
PATRIOTS (IF TEAMS DO NOT MEET ALL MONIES REFUNDED)
Jan 22 13317 ATL FALCONS +4?-120 o59-120 +190
3:05 PM 13318 N.E. PATRIOTS -4?-120 u59-120 -240

 

[DZ]

Judging from what I've posted above, I'd say that the lines on the dogs at Bookmaker are very bettable.

 

[AR182]

Judging from what I've posted above, I'd say that the lines on the dogs at Bookmaker are very bettable.

Something seems wrong....I cannot believe there is such a big line difference between the 2 sportsbooks....

 

[DR STRANGELOVE]

Something seems wrong....I cannot believe there is such a big line difference between the 2 sportsbooks....

Seems so.

Hope all is well with you and your family Al.

 

[AR182]

Seems so.

Hope all is well with you and your family Al.

Hey Anthony, things are fine here, thanks for asking....

Hope all is well with you as well....

 

[Scrapman]

OMG I predicted weeks ago Steelers - 2 1/2 VS Packers O/U 53 :0002

 

[Scrapman]

Super Bowl 51 EXACT match-up odds:

Patriots vs. Falcons +130
Patriots vs. Packers +240
Steelers vs. Falcons +375
Steelers vs. Packers +550:00hour


It?s been four years since both home teams lost on championship weekend. The Patriots lost at Gillette Stadium in the 2013 AFC Championship Game, and the Falcons were defeated at home on the same day.

Talk about history repeating itself here it is again BOTH HOME teams lose again on same fugging day :scared


looking for possible matchups point spreads HOLD ON

found it :

For the references, my offshore has these following hypothetical matchups in the SB LI:

Packers -1 (-110)
Steelers +1 (-110)

Packers +3 (-105)
Patriots -3 (-115)

Falcons +1.5 (-110)
Steelers -1.5 (-110)

Falcons +3.5 (-115)
Patriots -3.5 (-105)

Interestingly, Packers are -1 vs Steelers, yet Steelers are -1.5 vs Falcons.

 

[the addict]

Compliments of Bookmaker....

SUPER BOWL....POINTSPREADS
MATCHUP.........SPREAD
ATL-NE.............Patriots -7.5
GB-NE..............Patriots -7
ATL-PIT............Steelers -3
GB-PIT.............Steelers -2.5

I'm surprised Pitt would be favorite against gb

I'd of guessed pickem at least

So Pitt would be -5.5/6 at home vs gb
Give me gb if that's the case...rodgers would go nuts vs that secondary

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

[Jord20]

I'm surprised Pitt would be favorite against gb

I'd of guessed pickem at least

So Pitt would be -5.5/6 at home vs gb
Give me gb if that's the case...rodgers would go nuts vs that secondary

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

No shot those odds are correct - Pats over a TD favorite to either team is hilarious. Pitt as a FG favorite is almost as funny.

The ones Deezy posted look much more accurate

 

[Old School]

somebody has to have a biik and or lines maker connection to get the posted real skiiny


sag numbers ..THEY WILL CHANGE VERY LITTLE AFTER SUNDAY GAMES..



NE..28.96

ATL 27.71

PITT 25.28

GB...24.42

DO THE MATH...NO HOME TEAM FOR SUPER BOWL

+2.90 FOR CONF. CHAMP NE and ATL

CURRENT CONF CHAMP SIDE

NE -6

ATL. -5

DAMN NEAR PERFECT SAG/TO CURRENT

SAG IS A BAD MAN..........:0074

 

[Old School]

Compliments of Bookmaker....

SUPER BOWL....POINTSPREADS
MATCHUP.........SPREAD
ATL-NE.............Patriots -7.5
GB-NE..............Patriots -7
ATL-PIT............Steelers -3
GB-PIT.............Steelers -2.5

Sorry buddy didn't pay attention ..
your post clearly states the lines are from a great source in Bookmaker..


ATL 27.71 & NE 28.96 =NE{-2.25} VS BOOKMAKER NE-7.5...WOW THAT IS CRAZY

GB 24.42 & NE 28.96 =NE{-4.54} VS BOOKMAKER NE-7..THIS HOUSE LIKES THE PATS TO ROLL

ATL 27.71 & PITT 25.28 =ATL{-2.43} VS BOOKMAKER PITT-3 {That's a 5' swing..don't see that often w/Sag #'s

GB 24.42 & PITT 25.28 =PITT{-0.86} VS BOOKMAKERS PITT-2'

so compared to up to date Sag #'s

the comparison is ABOVE

very interested to see what happens with the opening lines..

can't fathom ATL a 7' dog to anyone
nor a Dog to the Steelers

 

[Jord20]

Southpoint opened games at this...

Falcons-1 over Steelers
Steelers -1 over Packers
Pats-3 over Falcons
Pats -4.5 over Packers

These make a lot of sense

 

[yyz]

According to those posts, the Packers match up better against both opponents than Atlanta does.

Doesn't that seem to make GB the obvious choice in this week's game?

 

[DZ]

According to those posts, the Packers match up better against both opponents than Atlanta does.

Doesn't that seem to make GB the obvious choice in this week's game?

I think this also factors in the increase in GB's power rating after defeating ATL on the road and the liability the sportsbooks expect on them from their very public backing and exposure to futures. I believe I remember hearing that the two teams that took the most futures money before the season started were GB and Pitt.

Also, I think ATL's home field advantage is worth slightly more TO THEM (more than the average 3pts for other home fields), as the dome suits their high-powered offensive style better. This advantage might be negated on a neutral field. Also, consider that NE's home field is worth slightly more, being somewhere around 3.5 or 4 pts.

Consider those factors when comparing lines this week to the look-aheads for the super bowl and it might make a little more sense.

 

[yyz]

I think this also factors in the increase in GB's power rating after defeating ATL on the road and the liability the sportsbooks expect on them from their very public backing and exposure to futures. I believe I remember hearing that the two teams that took the most futures money before the season started were GB and Pitt.

Also, I think ATL's home field advantage is worth slightly more TO THEM (more than the average 3pts for other home fields), as the dome suits their high-powered offensive style better. This advantage might be negated on a neutral field. Also, consider that NE's home field is worth slightly more, being somewhere around 3.5 or 4 pts.

Consider those factors when comparing lines this week to the look-aheads for the super bowl and it might make a little more sense.

Books have no liability on SB futures anymore. GB, NE, and PIT where the top three teams wagered on, but their odds were very low. ATL can ding them, but that will only short their win amount, it won't make them losers.