DTB,
Great idea, although a bit flawed, why are you using a map from 2000 and not 2008 ?
Not a surprise that the subject would be changed to something completely different. No problem.
Not a surprise that the subject would be changed to something completely different. No problem.
And I guess that none of the people in those highly populated areas pay any taxes? I thought those people lived in high tax states/areas?
I would agree, the republicans generally carry flyover country. A lot of land, little population. Kind of the way conservatives like their home areas...speaking of fences...
But, again, wasn't the point of the thread, thanks for playing - not.
Sorry Chad Your correct --Somehow I was reading your post and thinking TU.A few quick points...
? I don't have "a crew."
? Closed doors were fine when it was something you favored, as I recall, and I assume always would be. Selective indignation, I believe, would be what I would call it.
? The people will have their say in November, as they should, and what happens, happens. Would expect - as always - the party in power to lose seats in a mid-term election, so I assume history will repeat itself.
? I don't have "a base."
Back to my original point - do you agree with how the people protesting against democrats have acted, what they've said, the lengths they apparently will go? This bothered you greatly when the roles were reversed, and supposedly said a lot about the people doing it and their issues.
I think the standard should be that people should not yell racial and sexual hatred at legislators because they don't agree with what they just voted for. I think the standard should be that "right to life" supporters shouldn't say that they hope a congressman gets cancer and dies because he has a different view of a passing a piece of legislation than they do. I think the standard should be that people have no right to throw rocks and bricks through the window of offices because they disagree with a political stance. I think the standard should be a person should not threaten a legislator's life, say they will stalk them and disrupt their lives, threaten their family members, give out the home addresses of those legislators and encourage others to go engage in that kind of behavior.
I don't care what the issue is, or what party the person is a member of. My point was this was singled out by one conservative here in particular when the parties and "protestors" were reversed and discussed here, who found the behavior outlandish and reprehensible, and descriptive of the people who felt the way these people did about issues.
So, do you think this stuff is ok? Can't get an answer from the person I've been asking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.