that dunk sure looked like it should have counted

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
100-96 vs 102-96 makes a pretty big difference for people who bought 1 point on either the spread or the total...and a buddy who lives in vegas did both...got dal at -5.5 197.5

funny that the refs "went to the replay" but espn never actually showed a replay......anybody got it on dvr???
 

dcgoz

is happy..
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2008
717
6
0
Bham, Al
I did- the ball was out of his hand and in the cyclinder at 0.2. There was no doubt. If it wasnt NBA I would be shocked/appalled/stunned, but none of their sh*t is out of bounds.

And yes, I was layin 6.:facepalm:
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,062
51
48
Yet you still have people that say this shit isn't influenced/rigged.My ASS.Just another game that had influence,yet we still try and bet against the fix/or with it.
 

edludes

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 25, 2001
3,592
38
0
alaska
Not sure about the last shots timing,but chandler CLEARLY knocked down westbrook on the rebound right after this no call dirk hits the go ahead three.That was the game changer,Dallas would have been down 3 or 4 with possession at 1:14. Van Gundy agreed it was a foul.I'd have liked to see it played out with that foul called,there could well have been a sixth game.
 
Last edited:

Lefty Guns

bets sports
Forum Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,100
2
0
south fl
yeah I had Mavs -6 too. Sucked but I guess the Mavs had no business covering, but can't figure how the refs reviewed it and took the basket off looked like is was cleraly good. Guess Stern had OKC +5.5 and Mavs ML -300
 

GT11

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 28, 2005
3
0
1
Clock

Clock

100-96 vs 102-96 makes a pretty big difference for people who bought 1 point on either the spread or the total...and a buddy who lives in vegas did both...got dal at -5.5 197.5

funny that the refs "went to the replay" but espn never actually showed a replay......anybody got it on dvr???

Ref's got it right, they don't go by the clock on TV, if you watch the backboard lit up (signaling 0.00) when the TV clock was at .8. The ball was still in his hand. I replayed it as I also had over bought down, wasn't that close to be honest.... It's a new day!
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,062
51
48
It didn't just effect the side but the total as well.Opened at 198 and bounced up after that to 198- &199.Take away the dunk and all those Overs get taken away,even those that bought the half,truely another shady call in the NBA.They didn't show it again because they know it was bullshit.
 

R-7

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2005
335
2
0
I might be wrong, but on a dunk, does his hand/wrist need to be off the cylinder, not just the ball through? If so, then it is not even close. And I had Dallas -5.5, he should have dribbled out clock anyway also, that would have been a lucky cover, not a bad beat people...
 

BuckwheatJWN

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 13, 2009
3,124
37
48
Glad it didn't count because I would have been kicking myself for not buying the 1/2 pt on the point total. :shrug:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top