A couple of nasty pick-flips due to closing lines cost the model a winning week, but that kind of thing usually evens out by the end. Since Week 5, the model has gone 48.3% ATS and 67.2% SU, which is nothing to write home about, but does show improvement when using 2018 data only. Clearly 2017 numbers were no bases on which to make 2018 projections ? at least for this projection model, and I will need to make a change for 2019. Either start the model up after Week 4, or ? do something else?
A reminder: Some sites don?t allow the editing of posts, or limit the amount of time allowed to make changes. In such a situation, this means that as changes occur during the week, they will need to be posted as ?replies?, so you?ll need to scroll down to see the latest projections.
GLTA
A reminder: Some sites don?t allow the editing of posts, or limit the amount of time allowed to make changes. In such a situation, this means that as changes occur during the week, they will need to be posted as ?replies?, so you?ll need to scroll down to see the latest projections.
GLTA
Attachments
Last edited:


