The Refs went to the Phones to find out what VEGAS wanted to do

Coach Woody

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2003
1,409
5
0
59
Colorado
Never should have reviewed that play. Totally screwed all Pitt betters. The phone call was to Vegas, how do you want us to call they said.

What a shitty call on something that ment nothing except for Fantasy Players and Bettors in VEGAS.

VEGAS wins becuase most were on Pitt

Oh well, I'll find a new way to get screwed tommarrow:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj11: moon1 :s4: :s2:
 

bulldog

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 1999
5,404
155
63
deep south
what about the holding call on td with around 40 seconds to go or the other 12 on pitt. only one called on sd entire game. go figure.
 

LDB

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 18, 2007
18,728
68
48
39
Bay Area, CA
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

probably nailed that one right on the damn button
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
what about the holding call on td with around 40 seconds to go or the other 12 on pitt. only one called on sd entire game. go figure.

That hold was very very blatant. Nobody can complain about that flag on that play.:nono:
 

MonkeyPants

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 4, 2004
1,103
0
36
57
Phoenix
Looked like a TD to me....but it certainly would have been a theft of a pointspread cover for PIT. A game they never showed any shot at covering.
 

mercury

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
145
2
0
But why would you even try for the touchdown with 11 seconds left.You are taking a chance of a fumble on the handoff or the run.Just kick the FG for the win.That looks fishy to me, even before we get to the SD play at the end.If the intent was for Pitt to cover while winning the game then I would have liked to see the outrage if they had fumbled and lost the game.
 

Livin'tillthEnd

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 7, 2008
5,466
47
0
Dallas
if it wasn't for the bogus..

if it wasn't for the bogus..

Looked like a TD to me....but it certainly would have been a theft of a pointspread cover for PIT. A game they never showed any shot at covering.


pass interference call to set up S.D at the 3 in the 1st half, Pitt could have covered even without the ending if holding them to 3 as opposed to the 7. theres no way the pass was close to being catchable--oh well, insane game
 

Livin'tillthEnd

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 7, 2008
5,466
47
0
Dallas
pass interference call to set up S.D at the 3 in the 1st half, Pitt could have covered even without the ending if holding them to 3 as opposed to the 7. theres no way the pass was close to being catchable--oh well, insane game


but even then, Pitts got to punch it in at the goal line in the 1st half
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top