the warning kerry ignored

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
this is an interesting read


The New York Post - March 15, 2004

THE WARNING KERRY IGNORED

By PAUL SPERRY

March 15, 2004 -- SEN. John Kerry boasts how he "sounded the alarm on
terrorism years before 9/ 11," referring to his 1997 book "The New War."
Too bad he didn't blast it when it really counted - four months before
the hijackings, when he was hand-delivered evidence of serious security
breaches at Logan International Airport, with specific warnings that
terrorists could exploit them.

Former FAA security officials say the Massachusetts senator had the power
to prevent at least the Boston hijackings and save the World Trade Center
and thousands of lives, yet he failed to take effective action after they
gave him a prophetic warning that his state's main airport was vulnerable
to multiple hijackings.

"He just did the Pontius Pilate thing and passed the buck" on back
through the federal bureaucracy, said Brian Sullivan, a retired FAA special
agent from the Boston area who in May 2001 personally warned Kerry that
Logan was ripe for a "jihad" suicide operation possibly involving "a
coordinated attack."

Rewind to May 6, 2001. That night, a Boston TV station (Fox-25) aired
reporter Deborah Sherman's story on an undercover investigation at Logan
that Sullivan and another retired agent helped set up. In nine of 10
tries, a crew got knives and other weapons through security checkpoints -
including the very ones the 9/11 hijackers would later exploit.

The next day, Sullivan fired off a two-page letter to Kerry highlighting
the systemic failures.

"With the concept of jihad, do you think it would be difficult for a
determined terrorist to get on a plane and destroy himself and all other
passengers?" he warned. "Think what the result would be of a coordinated
attack which took down several domestic flights on the same day. With our
current screening, this is more than possible. It is almost likely."
The toll from such an attack would be economic, as well as human, he
predicted with chilling accuracy.

Sullivan followed up by having the undercover videotape hand-delivered to
Kerry's office.

More than 11 weeks later, Kerry finally replied to his well-informed and
anxious constituent. "I have forwarded your tape to the Department of
Transportation's Office of Inspector General [DOT OIG]," he said in a
brief July 24, 2001, letter, a copy of which I've obtained.

Yet Sullivan had made it clear in his letter that going to his old agency
was a dead end. He and other agents had complained about security lapses
for years and got nowhere. "The DOT OIG has become an ineffective
overseer of the FAA," he told Kerry. Sullivan suggested he show the tape to
peers on committees with FAA oversight. He even volunteered to testify
before them.

But he never heard from Kerry again.

At that point, Steve Elson, the other agent who'd teamed up on the TV
sting, decided to take a crack at the junior senator. A fiery ex-Navy
Seal, Elson spent three years as part of an elite FAA unit called the Red
Team, which did covert testing of airport security across the country,
before retiring as a field agent in Houston. He offered to fly to
Washington at his own expense to give Kerry a document-backed
presentation about the "facade of security" at Logan and other major airports.

But a Kerry aide said not to bother. "You're not a constituent," Elson
was told just a few weeks before the hijackings. He went ballistic, warning
that if Kerry didn't act soon he'd risk the lives of planeloads of his
actual constituents. That warning now looks like prophecy: At least 82
Kerry constituents were murdered aboard American Airlines Flight 11 and
United Airlines Flight 175.

"Enhanced security would have prevented the hijackings, virtually without
question," Elson now insists. If nothing else, it might have discouraged
ringleader Mohamed Atta, who monitored security procedures at Logan weeks
before the hijackings.

Yet the warnings apparently did stick in Kerry's mind: In the days after
9/11, Kerry told the Boston Globe that he'd triggered an undercover probe
of Logan security by the General Accounting Office in June 2001. But he
wrote Sullivan no such thing in his July letter, stating only that he
passed his warning and tape on to Transportation, not GAO. And GAO,
though it is the investigative arm of Congress, didn't seem to know what the
senator was talking about. The agency had tested security at two airports
before 9/11, but neither one was Logan. And Kerry confessed he didn't
know the outcome of the probe he says he triggered.

Some follow-up, senator.

Sullivan and Elson, joined by aviation-security experts David Forbes and
Andrew Thomas, want to see Kerry hauled before the 9/11 Commission to
answer questions about what he knew about Logan's lapses, and
specifically what he did about them, before that fateful day. It's a reasonable
request - especially since Kerry has complained that President Bush will only
give the panel an hour of his time.

Where was Kerry's sense of urgency? Where was his leadership? These are
fair questions to ask of someone vying for Bush's job. "We don't have to
wait for a tragedy to occur to act," Sullivan urged Kerry in his letter.
But tragically, that's exactly what happened - at both ends of Pennsylvania
Avenue, and on both sides of the aisle.

Paul Sperry is a Washington investigative reporter and author of "Crude
Politics."
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,858
430
83
54
Belly of the Beast
Gotcha!


9/11 Nonsense
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Wednesday 17 March 2004

The attacks of September 11 have become, morosely, a political football. The Bush for President campaign is running commercials that display burning towers and the faces of brave firefighters, said firefighters being played by actors. Despite outraged howls from real firefighters, who were joined in rage by family members of 9/11 victims, the commercials continue to run. Bush believes his leadership in the aftermath of the attacks should be a campaign issue, and so there it is.

In truth, however, September 11 became a political football on September 11. Conservative columnist Andrew Sullivan, in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, blamed the Clinton administration. "The decision to get down and dirty with the terrorists, to take their threat seriously and counter them aggressively, was simply never taken," wrote Sullivan. Senator Orrin Hatch referred in 1996 to the terrorist threats, threats which compelled Clinton to attempt the passage of a comprehensive anti-terrorism bill that would have gone a long way to stopping 9/11, as "Phony threats." After September 11, he joined the 'Blame Clinton' chorus.

During his administration, Clinton offered legislation that would give the Treasury Secretary broad powers to ban foreign nations and banks from accessing American financial markets unless they cooperated with money-laundering investigations that would expose and terminate terrorist cash flows. The legislation was killed by Texas Republican Senator Phil Gramm, who was chairman of the Banking Committee. At the time, he called the bill "totalitarian." It was revealed later, of course, that Gramm killed the bill because it would have blocked Enron officers from laundering stolen stockholder money through the same offshore conduits the terrorists were using. Gramm, from Texas, was beholden to Enron, and killed the bill at their behest. Of course, he joined the 'Blame Clinton' chorus after the attacks, and never mind the facts.

There was Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell blaming the attacks on gays, feminists and the ACLU a couple of days after the horror. They claimed the attacks were God's justice being levied against America for tolerating such people. No one quite explained the glaring hole in this logic - if the terrorists were acting as an instrument of God's justice, doesn't that mean the terrorists themselves are blameless instruments of the Lord? - but in the end, the message was clear. Liberals like Clinton were to blame for the attacks.

The list goes on. September 11 became a political football on that very day, and it has since been punted all over the playing field. The GOP has tried relentlessly to throw the blame at Clinton, but on Tuesday, the game took a bizarre new turn. According to an editorial in the New York Post, John Kerry is to blame for the attacks of September 11. Yes, you read that right. John Kerry did it.

The article, written by Paul Sperry and titled "The Warning Kerry Ignored," claims that Kerry was given a warning some months before the attacks of security problems at Logan Airport, where two of the planes originated, and failed to handle them properly. He sent the warning, received from an FAA agent in Boston, to the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General. According to this FAA agent, and according to Sperry, this wasn't good enough. Because of Kerry's failure, the article argues, 3,000 people are dead.

Hm.

The Bush administration received a blizzard of warnings before September 11 that something huge was about to happen. The security agencies of Germany, Israel, Egypt and Russia delivered specific warnings about airplanes being used as bombs against prominent American targets. FBI agents were raising alarms in Minnesota and Arizona. Donald Kerrick was a deputy National Security Advisor in the late Clinton administration. He stayed on into the Bush administration. He was a three-star General, and absolutely not political. He has reported that when the Bush people came in, he wrote a memo about terrorism, al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. The memo said, "We will be struck again." As a result of writing that memo, he was not invited to any more meetings. No one responded to his memo. He felt that, from what he could see from inside the National Security Council, terrorism was demoted.

Richard Clarke was Director of Counter-Terrorism in the National Security Council. He has since left. Clarke urgently tried to draw the attention of the Bush administration to the threat of al Qaeda. Richard Clarke was panicked about the alarms he was hearing regarding potential attacks. Clarke is at the center of what has since become a burning controversy: What happened on August 6, 2001? It was on this day that George W. Bush received his last, and one of the few, briefings on terrorism. According to reports, the briefing stated bluntly that Osama bin Laden intended to attack America soon, and contained the word "hijacking." Bush responded to the warning by heading to Texas for a month-long vacation. It is this briefing that the Bush administration has refused to divulge to the committee investigating the attacks.

There was not a single Republican member of Congress who ever raised a single question or put a query to the Clinton National Security Council about its efforts against terrorism before the attacks. When the Clinton team left office, their National Security group conducted three extensive briefings of the incoming Bush people. The attitude of the Bush people was, essentially, dismissive, that it was a "Clinton thing." Condoleezza Rice has admitted that the massive file on al Qaeda and bin Laden left for her by outgoing National Security Advisor Sandy Berger went completely unread until the attacks had taken place. This happened despite the fact that Berger told her during one such briefing, "I believe that the Bush Administration will spend more time on terrorism generally, and on al-Qaeda specifically, than any other subject."

One FAA agent delivered a security warning that was forwarded to the proper agency by the Senator who received it. Meanwhile, dozens of alarm bells were blaring in the White House, and especially in the Oval Office, about impending attacks using airplanes against prominent targets. This particular chapter of the 9/11 blame game would be uproariously hilarious if it were not so completely absurd.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
bobby,

thanks for posting the article.

it's something that even an incident as important as 9/11 each side blames the other.

it's rather disgusting !!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top