These Canadian Stocks May Be Worth a Look

s_dooley24

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,437
2
0
Selkirk- Care to pull the curtain back a little more on these?


Stock Strategist


These Canadian Stocks May Be Worth a Look
By Jonathan Schrader, CFA | 08-10-07 | 06:00 AM

At Morningstar, we now cover more than 2,000 stocks, each with its own analyst, fair value estimate, and Morningstar Rating. While the majority of these companies are based in the United States, Morningstar's coverage of non-U.S. stocks has been growing quickly. We're now approaching 400 non-U.S. companies under coverage, and the country with the biggest representation in this group by far is Canada.


While Canada's economy is relatively small compared with the U.S., investment opportunities abound. Canada is one of the United States' most vital trade partners, and with its abundance of natural resources, Canada is an increasingly important player on the global stage. Natural-resources companies--mining and energy in particular--represent a big chunk of Canada?s equity market and have generally performed very well in the past five years, leading the Canadian equity market higher. Over the past five years, in fact, Canada's S&P/TSX Composite index has returned 16.6% annually compared with just 10.7% for the S&P 500 (through June 30).

Morningstar covers about 50 natural-resources companies based in Canada, and two of them, Compton Petroleum (CMZ) and Talisman Energy (TLM) (Its Canada-listed ticker is TLM as well) now have 5-star Morningstar Ratings.

There's more to the Canadian equity market than natural resources: financial services, communications, and health-care companies are also well-represented in Canada and make up the majority of our Canadian coverage outside of natural resources. One of these health-care companies, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (ANPI), also has a 5-star rating now.

The Canadian firms that Morningstar covers have been steadily releasing their results from the second quarter. To introduce some of the Canadian companies we cover, we'll share our recent thoughts on second-quarter results from five of these firms. To learn even more about what Morningstar equity analysts think about the Canadian companies in Morningstar's coverage universe, our fair value estimates, and star ratings, visit us today at Morningstar.com.

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. (POT) (Canadian ticker: POT)
Analyst: Ben Johnson
Date of Analyst Note: 07-26-2007
Potash Corp continued to ride the rising tide in global agriculture in the second quarter. Its quarterly results, released July 26, were in line with our long-term operating projections, and we are maintaining our $84 fair value estimate.

Year-over-year comparisons are muddied by the fact that potash shipments to China were delayed well into the second half of 2006 as a result of drawn-out contract negotiations. But despite skewed comparisons, there is little doubt that business is booming in Saskatchewan. Average selling prices for potash, nitrogen, and phosphates rose by 5.8%, 12.9%, and 23.8%, respectively, versus the second quarter of 2006. The firm's year-to-date operating margin has soared 600 basis points against its full-year 2006 level to 29%. The company also continues to spew cash, having generated more than $520 million in free cash flow (almost 21% of sales) thus far in 2007.

During the quarter, Potash also announced that it will be (quite literally) digging its moat even wider, unveiling plans to develop a new Greenfield potash deposit in New Brunswick, Canada. The mine, scheduled for completion in 2011, will have an annual capacity of 2 million metric tons and cost approximately $1.6 billion to develop. The total cost of the project--which is 30% less than what it might cost a competitor to develop a similar project--is mitigated by the quality and structure of the deposit. That the mine will be able to share top-side resources with Potash's existing operations in the area provides further justification for the project. We view this expansion as a shrewd strategic investment and an efficient use of shareholders' capital.

Rogers Communications, Inc. (RCI)
(Canadian ticker: RCI.B)
Analyst: Jonathan Schrader, CFA
Date of Analyst Note: 08-01-2007
After reviewing Rogers second-quarter results, we're maintaining our $43 fair value estimate. In our opinion, Rogers' above-average prospects are already priced into its shares.

Compared with a year ago, Rogers increased total sales by 16% in the second quarter, to CAD 2.53 billion. With CAD 270 million more in sales compared with a year ago (a 25% jump), the wireless segment again led the way. This top-line growth was driven by an 8% increase in average revenue per wireless user, to CAD 72.65, on data growth of 51%. The wireless segment has been on fire in recent quarters, with average revenue per user increasing, churn decreasing, and the number of lucrative postpaid subscribers growing, to 5.56 million at the end of the second quarter. Given its momentum, the company raised the upper end of its guidance for this segment. We're not changing our assumptions, however, as we were already optimistic about the wireless segment's prospects for 2007.

Cable and telecom, Rogers' second-biggest business, also expanded its sales line nicely in the quarter, up 13% from a year ago. Profit results were less impressive, however, as operating costs increased even faster than sales. While management suggested on its conference call that it plans to increase margins to peer levels (above 40%), we suspect that this will take at least a year or two, especially if Rogers reaccelerates investment in the cable business to safeguard against the threat of terrorism or natural disaster, a potential use of growing cash flow suggested by Ted Rogers during the call.

In the second quarter, Rogers had a net loss of CAD 56 million because of a one-time charge related to its stock options. The company has altered its option plan to settle with cash rather than stock. This change mandates use of intrinsic value accounting rather than fair value accounting and also requires Rogers to carry the total intrinsic value of outstanding options as a liability on the balance sheet. This triggered a CAD 452 million charge to earnings in the quarter. This change in accounting will result in higher stock option expense in the future and will cause some volatility in results as movement in Rogers' stock price will cause changes in the marked-to-market value of its balance sheet liability and stock option expense.

Excluding this charge, Rogers' second-quarter results still weren't great, mostly because of rising costs in the cable and telecom segment. However, these 13 weeks of results don't alter our opinion that Rogers is one of the best-positioned communications companies in North America and a fine stock to hold in your portfolio, if you can buy it at a reasonable price.

Talisman Energy, Inc. (TLM)
(Canadian ticker: TLM)
Analyst: Kish Patel
Date of Analyst Note: 08-03-2007
Talisman Energy's second-quarter results reflected the ongoing sales of the company's noncore assets in an effort to improve the overall quality of its portfolio. Proceeds from the sales are being used to buy back shares, and this, in our opinion, is a smart move, given the current cost environment and the market valuation of the company's shares. The company noted that it has hired advisors to sell its midstream assets, a process that could be complete by year-end.

Tight industry conditions are causing a delay in bringing the Tweedsmuir field up to full production, and slower-than-anticipated production of a pipeline in Indonesia has led the company to reduce 2007 production guidance to the lower end of its guidance range (465,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day instead of the initial 485,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day). We still expect to see strong production growth in the fourth quarter from the North Sea and continued growth into 2008 and 2009.

John Manzoni is expected to take over the reins at Talisman at the beginning of September, with longstanding CEO Jim Buckee staying through October as part of the transition. We are eagerly anticipating Manzoni's vision for the company, and we are leaving our $26 fair value estimate intact for now.

Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. (FFH)
(Canadian ticker: FFH)
Analyst: Bill Bergman
Date of Analyst Note: 08-03-2007
On Thursday, Fairfax Financial Holdings reported outstanding results for the second quarter and first half of 2007. The insurance holding company's year-over-year earnings decline was due to a tough comparison, with realized investment gains doubling in 2006. Very positive trends lie underneath the reported earnings decline. Underwriting profitability continues to improve. The consolidated combined ratio for its underwriting subsidiaries came to a healthy 92% for the second quarter and 94% for the first half.

Fairfax's underwriting profits have coupled with high investment leverage and good investment results to produce outstanding operating returns. We like the quality of Fairfax's reported investment income, which is up 15% from the first half of 2006. Fairfax has been critical of securitized debt markets now under stress and put its money where its mouth is. It holds no mortgage or asset-backed securities or collateralized debt obligations and actually increased its hedges against risks facing counterparties active in those markets. Those hedges produced unrealized gains exceeding $500 million in recent months. This comes on top of a 60% increase in operating income in the first half of 2007. Our $292 fair value estimate is unchanged.

Telus Corporation (TU)
(Canadian ticker: T)
Analyst: Jonathan Schrader, CFA
Date of Analyst Note: 08-03-2007
Telus reported disappointing second-quarter results August 3. Sales gained 4.4% from the year-ago quarter, as a result of 11% growth in wireless revenue. The fixed-line business experienced a 0.8% decline in sales due to an 18% drop in long-distance sales. This poor fixed-line showing from wasn't unexpected; we forecast 0% growth from this business for 2007.

Our disappointment largely relates to Telus' cost increases in the quarter. The wireless unit experienced an 18% jump in operating expenses--adjusted for charges related to Telus' stock option cash settlement plan--compared with a year ago. All four of this unit's primary expense lines increased faster than sales in the quarter, leading to an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization margin of 45.5% compared with 49.9% a year ago. This showing is particularly poor relative to rival Rogers (RCI), which actually boosted its EBITDA margin to 51.7% in the quarter. Telus also trailed Rogers in net subscriber additions in the second quarter, though Telus did perform much better than the currently slumping Bell Mobility (BCE), which added only half as many (63,000) wireless subscribers as Telus.

Costs in the fixed-line business also climbed in the second quarter, up 2.2% after adjustments. Even though a 2.2% increase may seem small, its impact is significant given the challenges Telus faces in expanding this legacy business. Costs were higher in the quarter because of higher compensation expense and implementation of a new billing and client care system in Alberta. The hope of Telus' management is that costs associated with the Alberta rollout will reduce costs for future rollouts.

Management suggested that much of its higher costs in the second quarter would be reduced going forward, and this is what we continue to assume in our model. At present, we're giving management--which was very contrite on the conference call while reiterating its full-year forecast--the benefit of the doubt and expect improvement in the third quarter. If we don't see signs of improvement, we may opt to lower our $52 fair value estimate.



Jonathan Schrader, CFA, is a senior stock analyst with Morningstar.
 
Last edited:

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Dooley have some large positions in some of these stock, though many have options on them.

POT I used to own potash and made a great gain, however have not owned any this year and missed out. a triple. the stock is well run and should do just as good if not better than all of the fertlizers stocks.

have owned Agrium which is also a good fert. stock. would buy more if there was a pullback, remember when I paid much less on a valuation basis for these stocks. however they are holding up well in the market, pot close to its highs. as is Agrium.

since I have a position would like a 10% pullback, to add to positions.

RCI Rogers was a stock I always hated, there was a high debt and they always seemed to lose money, (well spend heavily.). Rogers is the best play for wirless in cdn. and also cable is doing well.

stock is just over 44 cdn., I have a 46 covered call on the stock for next month. premiums for calls on Rogers are good, at times.

so though I like the stock believe 3 months 44-48. long term a good wirless company. not sure if they buy out shaw, (another cdn. cable company in the next 2 years. family controlled). still Rogers now pays a small div, is paying down debt, and cash flow is increasing.

the most healthy of the telco/cable stocks in cdn.
should make 1.30 07 and 2 in 08

TLM have mentioned this stock several times. it is at 18.10 have covered calls on all of the position.

20 sept. calls. got 1.80

I do this often with tlm, if these calls expire worthless will sell, 20,22 a few months out.

TLM fell, and Jim Buckee is leaving their famous ceo, this probably has been a drag on the stock. still at one point this week it was selling for close to 4X cash flow, and getting cheap even on a pe basis. growing production in 08.

will hedge my large position with call until the rest of the year....by the way if I lose my position will sell puts on the company.

FFH use to follow fairfax, was at one time over 300 and had a large multiple. was often compared to berkshire. both in insurance.

anyways some years ago they took some missteps, this happens, one reason never invested in the company, was that unlike bershire, the company would never comunicate with shareholders.

they did a poor job of keeping shareholders informed. they have improved on this the last couple of years. so probably unfair crit. at this time.

will watch this company and may buy in the future, at below 8X earnings is not expensive.
also they ussually manage their money in a very conservative fashion.

should make 27 this year and 25 next. they even pay a small div....which they should increase.

may buy in the future....
cdn. insurance companies like ahead of fairfax, Sunlife, Manulife (do not own any mfc at this time),

T of the stocks mentioned largest holding, followed closely by RCI, TLM, do not own any pot or ffh.

BCE is being taken over by Teachers, they spent money, and more importantly management was probably distracted on the chance to take BCE over.

now ont. teachers have bce, Telus can get back to their business. they had a terrible quarter. however they put in some bad news.

would rank them behind rogers for wireless, however they are still doing well, also most of their business is in western Canada, which is one of the strongest economies in North America....much stronger than eastern cdn.

the stock is just over 54cdn. and really got beaten up the last two weeks....was close to 60.

bought a large positon at 44 in dec. and sold 75% of my position for between 60-61cdn. went up on takevover hype.

if bce is worth 42.75cdn. then telus probably is worth over 68. did not think it would happen though, or unlikely.

my remaiing position I have 60 November calls, got 1.80-2.20

should make 3.30 and 3.80 next year. if they have another bad quater will probably will sell the stock. however this is a well run telco, pays a decent div. so will hold and see after nov.

thanks
selkirk
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,472
142
63
Bowling Green Ky
Got a question myself on Canadian stock---

Canetic Resources Trust (CNE)

How do these people continue to pay 15% div?

Got to be something I'm not seeing as it looks to me they are just now gettig into the black on earnings.
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
these oil/gas income trusts pay a high yield or may.

in 2011 these trusts will be treated like other companies, and the tax holiday ends. however the libereals in opposition want to change the rules to allow certain sectors, one would be the energy trusts.

who knows, but as of 2011 these trusts will be taxed and their distributions will come down.

they are paying out roughly 67% of their cashflow. so do not think they will cut in the near future. ie. 6-9 months.

they have a mixutre of oil/gas, oil is doing great however pure trusts have had to cut dribtutions. very hard to make money in western cdn. on the current gas prices.

though they have hedges on these natural gas prices, if the price stays low it will still effect them.

I use to own Acclaim which merged with starpoint to create CNE.

Acclaim when I bought it, was yielding 18% and up, my only fear was that oil would go up and natural gas would move up from 3.

the stock doubled and payed me 18%.

overall I currently own two trusts, energy.

PWT.un (PWT) though would rate this as a sell/hold. only reason I still have is the .34 monthly div. however it has not performed well and may sell by year end.

CPG.un (which trades on Toronto) Cresent Point I prefer over the other two because it is oil. the other two have natural gas, which unless a storms slams in gulf of mexico, or very cold winter, looks dead for the rest of the year.

Cresent point energy yields 12.60%, would expect a gain of over 10% if not more espescially if oil holds above 70.

two more items to consider

1. Currency. a strong cdn. dollar actually hurts these trusts, they produce in cdn. and sell in US dollars. so if the cdn. dollar weakens =good.

goes up=bad. so a weak US dollar is not good for these trusts.

2. production growth. many of them grow to such a size that they tread water.


someone I know asked me about trust aobut six months ago...

I responded by saying would just rather have non energy trust companies.

overall that has worked out well, many trusts have cut their distributions and CNE, and PWT.un have fallen back....

Cresent point energy 12.60% yield (oil) buy

PWT.un, CNE, hold (buy if you believe in higher gas prices in the next six months.) they also have oil production.

thanks
selkirk
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
BJ both pwt.un and cne.un trade in the US.

under symbols pwe, and cne.

CPG.un which is the one would rate a buy only trades in cdn. they are worth following but for the most part would prefer to play any other part of the energy sector.

ie. producers, inter. , drilling (US, not cdn. drilliers...avoid cdn. drillers), and very few natural gas companies....... would avoid med, small natural gas stories....for the next 3 months.


I own PWE, would rate both of them holds.

thanks
selkirk
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top