They would never do it because of the money but who want to watch these teams just rollover and play 7 games. Play 3 games series and make them play every game hard or bye bye
these kind games reason they need single elimation or 3 game series
- Thread starter west coast guru
- Start date
- Feb 17, 2010
- 1,964
- 0
- 0
Used to be 5 and that was the best option.
Then STERN, TNT and ESPN and ABC met in a conference room and all came out smoking cigars.
- Feb 23, 2010
- 41
- 0
- 0
best of 7 is a fair format. best of 5 unless it goes 1-1-1-1-1- not 2- 2 -1 u can be down 2 games and have to win 3 in a row . i understand u earn home court but in a five game series its not really fair. noone says u have to watch:0corn plus hammer the favorite.
- Feb 17, 2010
- 1,964
- 0
- 0
5 games was very fair....Why should the 8 seed a 41-41 team have the same %'s as a team who won 59 or 60 games....That higher seed earned that advantage.
- Feb 23, 2010
- 41
- 0
- 0
earned the advantage to most likely win at home to put a team up to the wall if the team is so good and wins 60 games why would it have a problem with a 41 41 team????? that doesnt make it fair!!! you can have a 5 game series just goes every other home game thats still a 1 game advantage right!!!:0corn the better team usually always wins a 7 game series but not necesarily a 5 game series:toast:
