This Cia leak goes right to the top.

Clem D

Mad Pisser
Forum Member
May 26, 2004
11,277
31
0
53
Long Branch NJ
Witnesses told a federal grand jury President George W. Bush knew about, and took no action to stop, the release of a covert CIA operative's name to a journalist in an attempt to discredit her husband, a critic of administration policy in Iraq.

Their damning testimony has prompted Bush to contact an outside lawyer for legal advice because evidence increasingly points to his involvement in the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame's name to syndicated columnist Robert Novak.
The move suggests the president anticipates being questioned by prosecutors. Sources say grand jury witnesses have implicated the President and his top advisor, Karl Rove.

White House spokesmen, however, dismiss the hiring of outside counsel as a routine precaution.

"The president has made it very clear he wants everyone to cooperate fully with the investigation and that would include himself," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Wednesday night.

He confirmed that Bush had contacted Washington attorney Jim Sharp. "In the event the president needs his advice, I expect he probably would retain him," McClellan said. There is no indication Bush has been questioned yet.

A federal grand jury has questioned numerous White House and administration officials to learn who leaked the name of CIA operative Plame, wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, to the news media. Wilson has charged that officials made the disclosure in an effort to discredit him.

Bush has been an outspoken critics of leaks, saying they can be very damaging, but he has expressed doubts that the government's investigation will pinpoint who was responsible. While Bush has said he welcomed the leak investigation, it has been an awkward development for a president who promised to bring integrity and leadership to the White House after years of Republican criticism and investigations of the Clinton administration.

Even though he has a White House counsel, Bush is dependent on outside lawyers for private matters. A memo distributed to the staff last year reminded officials that the counsel's office works solely for the president in his official capacity and is not a private attorney for anyone.

Democrats seized on the news to criticize the president.

"It speaks for itself that the president initially claimed he wanted to get to the bottom of this, but now he's suddenly retained a lawyer," said Jano Cabrera, spokesman for the Democratic National Committee. "Bush shouldn't drag the country through grand juries and legal maneuvering. President Bush should come forward with what he knows and come clean with the American people."

Plame was first identified by syndicated columnist and TV commentator Novak in a column last July. Novak said his information came from administration sources.

Wilson has said he believes his wife's name was leaked because of his criticism of Bush administration claims that Iraq had tried to obtain uranium from Niger, which Wilson investigated for the CIA and found to be untrue.

Disclosure of an undercover officer's identity can be a federal crime. The grand jury has heard from witnesses and combed through thousands of pages of documents turned over by the White House, but returned no indictments.

The probe is being handled by Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, appointed after Attorney General John Ashcroft stepped aside from case because of his political ties to the White House.

Wilson has suggested in a book that the leaker was Lewis "Scooter" Libby, chief of staff to Vice President Cheney. But Wilson's book, "The Politics of Truth," gave no conclusive evidence for the claim.

The White House denied the claim and accused Wilson of seeking to bolster the campaign of Democrat John Kerry, for whom he has acted as a foreign policy adviser.

Wilson also said it's possible the leak came from Elliott Abrams, a figure in the Reagan administration Iran-Contra affair and now a member of Bush's National Security Council. And Rove, Bush's chief political adviser, may have circulated information about Wilson and Plame "in administration and neoconservative circles" even if Rove was not himself the leaker, Wilson wrote.

Another possibility is that two lower-level officials in Cheney's office - John Hannah or David Wurmser - leaked Plame's identity at the behest of higher-ups "to keep their fingerprints off the crime," Wilson speculated.

Sources within the investigation say evidence points to Rove approving release of the leak. They add that their investigation suggests the President knew about Rove's actions but took no action to stop release of Plame's name.

The link from July 2004
Capital Blue.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=32&num=4629
 

Clem D

Mad Pisser
Forum Member
May 26, 2004
11,277
31
0
53
Long Branch NJ
Responses of the Bush administration
President George W. Bush and his White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan have made several statements about the administration's response if anyone were found to have been involved in the leak:

McClellan - September 29, 2003: "The President has set high standards, the highest of standards for people in his administration. He's made it very clear to people in his administration that he expects them to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration." [25]
Bush - September 30, 2003: "I don't know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action." [26]
McClellan - October 7, 2003: "Let me answer what the President has said. I speak for the President and I'll talk to you about what he wants." and "If someone leaked classified information, the President wants to know. If someone in this administration leaked classified information, they will no longer be a part of this administration, because that's not the way this White House operates, that's not the way this President expects people in his administration to conduct their business." [27]
Bush - June 10, 2004: Responded to media question referring to "anybody who leaked the agent's [Valerie Plame's] name" and then asked the President "do you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have done so," to which the President responded "Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts." [28]
Bush - July 18, 2005: "If someone committed crime, they will no longer work in my administration."
Many people, including several former CIA officials who worked with Plame, as well as members of the press and politicians from both parties, pointing to the October 2003 and June 2004 statements, contend that the President has changed his position over time, from originally stating that he would fire anyone involved in the leak, to stating that only those who "committed a crime" would be fired. Members of the Bush Administration and some Republicans contend that the position has remained consistent ? only those criminally responsible for the leak would be fired.
 

Clem D

Mad Pisser
Forum Member
May 26, 2004
11,277
31
0
53
Long Branch NJ
Lets recap..

Bush said in 2003, anyone in his admin would be fired if they were involved.

However he knew if he fired rove, he could not retain the presidency.

It is obvious that bush and or cheney called the play on this one or at a minimum were in approval if it were their trusted right hand men were the Quarterbacks.

If George and Dicky didn't know, what does that say about their control of their staff?




If possible please stick to the topic at hand DTB. If you can't it is ok to just not respond.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
Clem,

Don't you know that Clinton is responsible for the leak! Expect any day now that it will be announced that Ken Starr has been summoned to start the investigation into why Clinton allowed his subordinates to leak this information and how much he knew of the leak.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I think the really tricky thing for our beloved "leader" is that when he backtracked and changed his tune to say that only if anyone is INDICTED, then they would be dismissed. There's really nowhere to go and save face, if that happens. Not saying it will happen, now that Miller has suddenly come down with amnesia, just mentioning it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top