THURSDAY TO MONDAY

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
SAN FRAN +10.5 7%

SAN FRAN TEAM TOTAL OVER 17.5 4%

TEASE SAN FRAN +17.5 OVER 37.5 6%
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
NOT A GOOD START




SEATLE +6.5 NOT ATLANTA 8%

ML TOO

NO +105 6%

CAROLINA -2.5 7%


 
Last edited:

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
thunder i thought maybe you had a relapse and thought joe montanta was the qb.....did you forget alex smith was at qb:scared good luck rest of week......love the falcons and saints:toast:
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
Niners now Seattle:scared You enjoy punishment dont you....i see a 31-13 game atlanta:scared You are way off here on this Atlanta game:box2: No way they win straight up:142smilie
good luck it is not often I strongly disagree with your card but niners and seattle:142smilie
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
Niners now Seattle:scared You enjoy punishment dont you....i see a 31-13 game atlanta:scared You are way off here on this Atlanta game:box2: No way they win straight up:142smilie
good luck it is not often I strongly disagree with your card but niners and seattle:142smilie

KIND OF CRAZY ISNT IT- CAN YOU GIVE ME SOME REASONING ON TAKING ATLANTA
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
LET ME THROW THIS AT YOU TEAMS THAT WON THERE FIRST 2 ROAD GAMES AND ARE ON THERE 3RD FAVORED BY 3.5 OR HIGHER HAVE COVERED TWICE SINCE 1988 - THEY ARE 2 AND 16 ATS IN THIS SITATION AND LOST STRAIGHT UP 11 OF THOSE TIMES- ADD IN THE TRAVEL HERE SEATLE IS PLAYING FOR THERE PLAYOFF LIVES- 7 IS WAY TO MUCH- NOW IF ATLANTA WOULD HAVE LOST LAST WEEK I LIKE THERE CHANCES BETTER TO WIN SU BUT 7 WOULD STILL BE TO HIGH
 

GoDawgs10

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2010
500
5
18
Seattle
LET ME THROW THIS AT YOU TEAMS THAT WON THERE FIRST 2 ROAD GAMES AND ARE ON THERE 3RD FAVORED BY 3.5 OR HIGHER HAVE COVERED TWICE SINCE 1988 - THEY ARE 2 AND 16 ATS IN THIS SITATION AND LOST STRAIGHT UP 11 OF THOSE TIMES- ADD IN THE TRAVEL HERE SEATLE IS PLAYING FOR THERE PLAYOFF LIVES- 7 IS WAY TO MUCH- NOW IF ATLANTA WOULD HAVE LOST LAST WEEK I LIKE THERE CHANCES BETTER TO WIN SU BUT 7 WOULD STILL BE TO HIGH

Damn Thunder, that is some good shit right there.:0008
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
It is the NFL anything can happen we saw the lions beat the Packers. Seahawks have no running game and are one dimensional. The Falcons have shutdown every one dimensional team they have played. They have killed teams with losing records this year 41-7 zona 20-16 sf 20-10 clev 39-32 cinncy 34-17 rams 31-10 carolina.......against teams with losing records they have not covered the 6.5 one week...they do not letdown vs inferior opponents....only cinncy was able to score on the defense but they do have good offensive weapons....seattle does not have the weapons at receivers to beat this defense.....i just do not see one advantage the hawks have in this game....the falcons have the better offense defense quarterback coach u name it....the hawks have proven they are not good on there homefield this year getting beatdown by the giants and chiefs...the falcons will be able to do whatever they want against this defense

how do you think the hawks defense will stop this offense? how do you think a team with no running game can be effective against falcons d?

I see this game playing out no different then the Charger Niner game

One of us will cash good luck and I hate going against you but :0corn
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
i understand the angle you are playing 3rd str8 road game but I am looking at the matchups on both sides of the ball and I can not see one that favors seattle:shrug:
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
2009 two teams were favored on there third game of road trip
giants win 27-16 9pt favs
hawks win 27-17 3.5 favs
2006 boys -6.5 win 27-10
2005 jags -3 win 20-14

Last 5 years 4 teams have been favored on the 3rd game of a 3 week road trip and the fav is

4-0:toast:
 

jtc1984

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
762
0
16
71
Fl
Read what he wrote...its not just the 3rd game of the road trip....why always negative?....

TEAMS THAT WON THEIR FIRST 2 ROAD GAMES AND ARE ON THERE 3RD FAVORED BY 3.5 OR HIGHER HAVE COVERED TWICE SINCE 1988
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
Read what he wrote...its not just the 3rd game of the road trip....why always negative?....

TEAMS THAT WON THEIR FIRST 2 ROAD GAMES AND ARE ON THERE 3RD FAVORED BY 3.5 OR HIGHER HAVE COVERED TWICE SINCE 1988

THANKS
 

a-train

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
226
0
0
richmond virginia
Thunder
Not only does Seattle fit your third road game system but it is a "due factor" home dog--basically taking home dogs that have looked really shitty against teams that have played well and the public is on--you always get a few extra points--they hit in the low 60s percent the past decade. Seattle is my biggest bet of they year so far. Good luck to you!
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
i know what thunder said and what his trend was....he asked me reason for the game and I was pointing it out......i was pointing out that 4 teams in the past 5 years have been favored on the 3rd game of a 3 game road trip and all four have won a covered

he asked me why i liked it and I told him and if you think that is being negative you need to get your head examined lol

We will know the outcome Sunday around 4pm pacific time and if thunder wins i will take my :0008
Thunder is obviously betting a trend. I wanted to point out a trend that was 4-0 against thunder the past 5 years. That trend means nothing to me as I am on Falcons because of the matchups
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
Atlanta will be trying to do something on Sunday that only three teams since 2000 have ever done. Atlanta will be looking to win their third straight road game and it has only happened four times in the last decade. Jacksonville did it in 2001 and in 2005, the Eagles did it in 2005 and the Giants did it in 2009. Atlanta beat Tampa Bay and Carolina and now has to go out west for their third straight road game. The Falcons really have focused on winning on the road this season as they are 5-2. Those five wins are already more than they had last year. Atlanta has shown they can win out west as they beat San Francisco last season and in 2008 they won at Oakland and San Diego.PASTED THIS FROM GOOGLE-BUT IT IS ACCURATE -

JAGS IN O1 AND o5 WERE FAVORED By 1 AN 2.5 SINCE 2000 TEAMS OVER 3.5 ARE 0-9 ATS IN THIS SITUATION OF OVER 3.5 FAVORED ATS AND 2-7 SU IN THE REGULAR SEASON SINCE 2000

05 EAGLES AND GIANTS WERE PLAYOFFS AND BOTH WERE DOGS THERE 3RD GAME
 

jtc1984

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
762
0
16
71
Fl
west coast guru= negative once again....chill out tough guy....you're still reading it wrong....best of luck to you and a Merry Christmas to all and to you west coast good night....
 

west coast guru

Registered User
Forum Member
May 18, 2001
1,696
1
0
jtc are u that much of a moron man? I know what thunders trend is. I was pointing out a trend that is 4-0 the past 5 years which supports the Falcons...are you really that dumb????
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top