Thursday

Nickelback

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,361
0
0
Southwest
Stanford -1 Very Very Very Very Very Big

Enough said about this one!

Washington -4 Very Big

As long as Stanford comes in, it'll be a great night. If Washington follows, its icing on the cake
 

big papi

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 20, 2006
3,444
1
0
was looking at stanford myself and now I might have to pull the trigger. USC is very solid though but stanford is the right play at home.
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
gl nickleback

will be on washington ml myself for tomorrow

you have really heated up this forum with your plays

keep it up!
 

Jorgesca

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
447
3
0
Mexico
why do you like stanford so much? besides the unranked thing... dont always see that big of a play from you. Been waiting for an Arizona game play from you, your always right on with them. Good luck
 

alliecat

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2001
315
0
0
Texas
NB - do you have a record this year for the unranked fave theory? I had 20-8 at one time very recently, but I am sure I missed a few (or unintentionally added some). Only if you have it off-hand and I apologize ahead of time if I am out of line. GL

btw - thanks for making me some serious $$$ last few weeks.
 

THE WIZZARD

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 2001
3,583
1
0
Pittsburgh, Pa
NICKEL,

I AGREE AND WASH IS MY GAME OF NIGHT, I WILL ML THEM THOUGH.

A TEAM LOSING 5 OUT OF LAST 6 SHOULDN'T BE SPOTTING A TEAM WITH ONE LOSS....MAKES NO SENSE, I HAVE TO PULL THE TRIGGER........GUESS I WILL HAVE TO PLAY YOUR OTHER PLAY ALSO, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK.

WIZZ.
 

Nickelback

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,361
0
0
Southwest
Sorry guys . . . .been a busy day and I couldn't get to the computer till now.

I love Stanford in this spot at home. They have played the tougher schedule by far and always show up at home. I may have put too many "Very's" in my post but this is definitely one of my largest wagers of the year. The fact this is a system play is a bonus but I would have played this very big system or no system.

Gl
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
nice call....right there with ya on stanford....stanford is a very solid team esp at home, and only laying one vs sc who was ready to lose after being at home for the past 2 weeks....seemed too good to be true

fwiw....like sc as well and have them at 100-1 to win it all....dont really think they can win 6 games in march but wouldnt be a total shock to see them get to the final 4
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
nice call....right there with ya on stanford....stanford is a very solid team esp at home, and only laying one vs sc who was ready to lose after being at home for the past 2 weeks....seemed too good to be true

fwiw....like sc as well and have them at 100-1 to win it all....dont really think they can win 6 games in march but wouldnt be a total shock to see them get to the final 4

every season, i rank teams based on all the games that i watch. and more often than not, i am able to get solid reads on teams. but i was dead wrong on usc this year. i thought theyd be horrible. and frankly, they looked horrible early in the season. especially against south carolina in the opener of the galen center. but i totally agree with you that it wouldnt be a shock if they were an elite 8 team. there is something about this team that i really like. stanford got 'em good tonight. but the trojans are legit. its a shame mayo is coming for selfish reasons next year because they could be damn good next yr too but chemistry issues might be a problem. but i def agree on usc as a sleeper this year.

and oh yeah, congrats on a damn solid play nickel :mj07:
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
WHAT MORE CAN I SAY

BUT

THANK YOU AGAIN !
happydance.gif
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
every season, i rank teams based on all the games that i watch. and more often than not, i am able to get solid reads on teams. but i was dead wrong on usc this year. i thought theyd be horrible. and frankly, they looked horrible early in the season. especially against south carolina in the opener of the galen center. but i totally agree with you that it wouldnt be a shock if they were an elite 8 team. there is something about this team that i really like. stanford got 'em good tonight. but the trojans are legit. its a shame mayo is coming for selfish reasons next year because they could be damn good next yr too but chemistry issues might be a problem. but i def agree on usc as a sleeper this year.

and oh yeah, congrats on a damn solid play nickel :mj07:

young and pruitt are two stud scorers from the outside and off the dribble.....stewart has been very good this year spotting up and gibson is a beast......if they get good pg play they can hang with anybody.....plus under floyd they actually are a very good defensive team and that will help them come march.....problem is sc always seems to go one and out when they make the dance, happy and surprised to be there.....

stanford on the other hand will also be a tough out with their size.....

in fact....ucla-ua-wsu-ore-sc-stan all look like tough outs in march with cal probably nit bound and uw still a puzzle.....they better put a winning streak together soon to have any chance at a bid
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top