ethical deficit
Please give your take on this and help me understand why you blindly support this candidate
Please give your take on this and help me understand why you blindly support this candidate
To my friends on the left
- Thread starter Cie
- Start date
opcorn2
Crickets....because most will vote their party line regardless of candidate.
This is why we are where we are with 2 bad major party candidates. One is a cocky jerk, while the other is a liar and criminal.
This is why we are where we are with 2 bad major party candidates. One is a cocky jerk, while the other is a liar and criminal.
I would be willing to wager that 75 percent of the Pro Clinton voters have no clue about the uranium deal with Russia that allows Russia to control 20 percent of US Uranium reserves and up to 50 percent of future reserves. $31 million went to Clinton Foundation and Bill got his 500k speech fee in Moscow. This deal went down with HRC as Secretary of State and she did nothing to stop the deal.
I also think most of these voters do not care that a small percentage of the money raised by Clinton Foundation actually goes to charity. It has been reported less than 10 percent goes to charity and about 50 million went for travel expenses. These figures may or not be accurate but the Foundation exists mainly to make the Clintons rich. It has done a good job of that.
I also think most of these voters do not care that a small percentage of the money raised by Clinton Foundation actually goes to charity. It has been reported less than 10 percent goes to charity and about 50 million went for travel expenses. These figures may or not be accurate but the Foundation exists mainly to make the Clintons rich. It has done a good job of that.
#1) Both liars
#2) Both alleged criminals. Neither convicted of anything. One for corruption, negligent email usage. One for sexual assault and fraud. So all due respect Cie, and I do respect you, they are both equal there.
I don't vote blindly. For me, overall, I am a progressive. I steadfastly believe the slow repeal of Roosevelt economic progressivism is a huge negative. I WANT my social security there in 10 years. Trust me I would much rather have Warren. Anyone who can shame a bank CEO to quit is ok in my book. (I await you Indian memes skulnik) To me the take my ball and go home attitude of the congressional/senate tea party republicans is so disgusting and has turned off any chance of me going to that side. Their vindictive investigations and hearings. Benghazi went longer then investigations into Watergate, Pearl Harbor. Really guys? How long were the hearings for 9/11? Yeah I thought so. Politics is compromise, period. Goes for both sides. Pretty clear to me which side is worse now.
#2) Both alleged criminals. Neither convicted of anything. One for corruption, negligent email usage. One for sexual assault and fraud. So all due respect Cie, and I do respect you, they are both equal there.
I don't vote blindly. For me, overall, I am a progressive. I steadfastly believe the slow repeal of Roosevelt economic progressivism is a huge negative. I WANT my social security there in 10 years. Trust me I would much rather have Warren. Anyone who can shame a bank CEO to quit is ok in my book. (I await you Indian memes skulnik) To me the take my ball and go home attitude of the congressional/senate tea party republicans is so disgusting and has turned off any chance of me going to that side. Their vindictive investigations and hearings. Benghazi went longer then investigations into Watergate, Pearl Harbor. Really guys? How long were the hearings for 9/11? Yeah I thought so. Politics is compromise, period. Goes for both sides. Pretty clear to me which side is worse now.
You're correct lowell: I have no idea about that uranium deal with Russia.
Can you clue me in?
Start here:
http://correctrecord.org/fact-check-donald-trumps-false-claim-on-russian-uranium-deal/
Or here:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/
Or here:
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-veto-power-for-clinton-on-uranium-deal/
Just one question, lowell: How did you get so stupid? :mj07:
I don't party line. I have voted for Dems, Repubs and independents.
This election is a choice as to which turd stinks least.
Hillary actually has a clue about the job of President, foreign policy, and working in Congress. I don't like her, but she can do the job.
Trump's qualifications are Zero. He's, at best, a scam artist.
You must be desperate to use corecttberecord which is super PAC formed to help Clinton
Sad thing is you probably believe what you post.
April 23, 2015 NYTimes ran article about Clinton and Russian uranium deal.
Even as dumb as you are you probably can google the story.
It is written by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire.
Andy Hoffman and Will Kennedy also have article from April 23, 2015 written for Bloomberg.
Educate yourself before trying to spew your hatred.
Even as dumb as you are you probably can google the story.
It is written by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire.
Andy Hoffman and Will Kennedy also have article from April 23, 2015 written for Bloomberg.
Educate yourself before trying to spew your hatred.
Well, numbnuts, if you can find someone to read to you the article you quoted, you'll learn that it was about the Russian partial purchase of Uranium One, A Canadian company, and required neither the approval of the US Secretary of state (Hillary Clinton), nor did she have any authority to stop it.
I was a purchase by Russia of part of a Canadian company.
Now stop being a liar and total dickhead.
Bill Clinton engineered the deal. Pay to play just like the Clintons did many other times.
He then got his 500k for Moscow speech.
Even you can't be this dumb.
Ask the people in Haiti how the Clintons screwed them.
If a Republican had half as many lies/deceptions/illegal activities as the Clintons you would screaming Foul . To say otherwise is a boldface lie.
He then got his 500k for Moscow speech.
Even you can't be this dumb.
Ask the people in Haiti how the Clintons screwed them.
If a Republican had half as many lies/deceptions/illegal activities as the Clintons you would screaming Foul . To say otherwise is a boldface lie.
Bill Clinton engineered a deal between Russia and Canada? I'll bet Putin and Trudeau don't agree with you.
JFYI, they are the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of the Russian Federation. Both plenty sharp dudes. If they are sharp as surgical needles, then you're a golf ball. Get it?
Like I said, lowell, try to find a literate 12 year old to read the stuff you can't understand to you.
It was a deal between the Russians and the Canadians. Nothing to do the USA government. BIll Clinton was, at the time, an ordinary private citizen. Duh.
Haiti? Since when was that part of the USA?
Aren't you EVER embarrassed by your own profound stupidity?
You're the ultimate argument for limiting voting rights to only those with 60+ IQs.
Does your Mommy type for you?
Last edited:
Yep. And I want you, your siblings, spouse, parents and children to get a second job to pay the bills
