Tragic News Story

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
The following is a Tragic but true story.
http://www.herald-citizen.com/NF/omf.wnm/herald/news_story.html?[rkey=0024251+[cr=gdn


'Felony stop' leaves family traumatized
Mary Jo Denton
Herald-Citizen Staff

It was the most traumatic experience the Smoak family of North Carolina has ever had, and it happened yesterday afternoon as they traveled through Cookeville on their way home from a vacation in Nashville.

Before their ordeal was over, three members of the family had been yanked out of their car and handcuffed on the side of Interstate 40 in downtown Cookeville, and their beloved dog, Patton, had been shot to death by a police officer as they watched.

What was their crime?

There was no crime.

But a passerby with a cell phone apparently assumed a crime had occurred when a wallet flew from a car on Interstate 40 near Nashville.

That citizen called police and inadvertently set in motion what would make it the most horrible vacation the James Smoak family of Saluda, North Carolina, has ever had.

Today, the Smoak children and their parents were still weeping over what happened to them in Cookeville.

By today, they had also filed complaints with two police agencies, prompting internal investigations, they had met with Tennessee Highway Patrol Capt. Randy Hoover, and they were on their way to talk to Cookeville Mayor Charles Womack.

Because official internal investigations are underway at the Tennessee Highway Patrol and at the Cookeville Police Dept., the Herald-Citizen was unable to get details of those two agencies' accounts of the incident.

But the Smoak family willingly told their story to anyone who would listen; they hope by doing so that something might be done to prevent it from happening to another family.

James Smoak, 38, who was traveling in the family station wagon with his wife, Pamela, their 17-year-old son, Brandon, and the family's two pet bulldogs, Patton and Cassie, had lost his wallet after stopping for gas as they left Davidson County on Wednesday afternoon.

But he didn't know he lost it. Apparently, he had placed it on top of the car while pumping gas, and it flew off somewhere on the highway a short time later.

Not knowing his wallet was lost, he and his family traveled on, heading east on their way home to North Carolina.

A few cars behind James and Pamela's station wagon, his parents and the two younger Smoak children were traveling in the elder Smoak's car.

Just a few miles east of Cookeville, James Smoak began to notice that a THP squad car was following him, though the officer was not pulling him over, just staying behind him, changing lanes any time Smoak did, moving in and out of traffic each time Smoak did.

"It was obvious he was looking at me, not at other vehicles, and I'm thinking I must have done something (in my driving), but I don't know what," Smoak said today.

When Smoak reached the 287 exit area in Cookeville, three other police cars suddenly appeared, and the trooper then turned on blue lights and pulled the Smoak car over.

"I immediately pulled to the side, and expecting him to come to the window, I started reaching for my wallet to get my license and it was not there," Smoak said.

About that time, he heard the officer broadcast orders over a bullhorn, telling him to toss the keys out the car window and get out with his hands up and walk backwards to the rear of the car.

Still not knowing what he was being stopped for, Smoak obeyed, and when he reached the back of the car, with a gun pointed at Smoak, the trooper ordered him to get on his knees, face the back of the car and put his head down.

When he did that, the officer handcuffed him and placed him in the patrol car. Then the same orders were blared over the bullhorn to "passenger" and Pamela Smoak got out with her hands up, was ordered to the ground, held at gunpoint, and handcuffed. Next, Brandon was ordered out and handcuffed in the same way.

Terrified at what was happening to them for no reason they knew, the family was also immediately concerned about their two pet dogs being left in the car there on the highway with the car doors open.

"We kept asking the officers -- there were several officers by now -- to close the car doors because of our dogs, but they didn't do it," said Pamela Smoak.

And as the officers worked in the late evening darkness, their weapons drawn as the Smoaks were being handcuffed, the dog Patton came out of the car and headed toward one of the Cookeville Police officers who was assisting the THP.

"That officer had a flashlight on his shotgun, and the dog was going toward that light and the officer shot him, just blew his head off," said Pamela Smoak.

"We had begged them to shut the car doors so our dogs wouldn't get out, and they didn't do that."

As the dog was heading out of the car toward the officer, "we had yelled, begging them to let us get him, but the officer shot him," she said.

Grieving for their dog and in shock over their apparent arrest for some unknown crime, the family could only wait. At one point, one state trooper did tell them they "matched the description" in a robbery that had occurred in Davidson County, Pamela Smoak said.

The ordeal went on for a time after that, the family terrified and in grief over the dog.

Finally, after a time, someone in authority figured out that the officers here had stopped and were holding the very family that someone in Davidson County had assumed had been robbed, though how that assumption grew to the authorization for a felony stop, James Smoak cannot understand, he said today.

"Finally, they asked me my name and I told them my name, date of birth, and other information, and they talked by radio to someone in Davidson County and finally realized that a mistake had been made," he said.

"A lady in Davidson County had seen that wallet fly off our car and had seen money coming out of it and going all over the road, and somehow that became a felony and they made a felony stop, but no robbery or felony had happened," Pamela Smoak said.

"Apparently, they had listened to some citizen with a cell phone and let her play detective down there," said James Smoak.

"Here we are just a family on vacation, and we had to suffer this."

When the officers did discover the mistake, "they said, 'Okay, we're releasing you and we're sorry,'" Smoak said.

As soon as Brandon was released from the handcuffs, he rushed over to the dead dog and began to cry, Smoak said.

And that's when one of the most infuriating parts of the ordeal happened, according to James Smoak.

"I saw one of the THP officers walk over to the city officer who had shot the dog and grin," he said.

He reported that to the supervising officer, THP Lt. Jerry Andrews, and Andrews "was very nice, very professional," Smoak said.

"He told me the officer was not laughing, but I know he was," said Smoak.

Smoak's parents had come along behind the other car and had seen all the commotion and stopped too, and now all three children were crying over their pet dog, as they were still doing today.

The Smoaks gathered the body of their pet and went to a motel here to spend the night. But they didn't get much rest, and at one point, James Smoak became so upset he had to go to the hospital for medical treatment.

They also worked throughout last night to contact all the authorities they could in order to lodge their complaints about what had happened.

Today, Beth Womack, a THP spokesperson in Nashville, told the H-C that an Internal Affairs investigation is underway and that every effort will be made to "find out exactly what happened and why."

"As I understand it, a report was made in Davidson County to our officers that this car had been seen leaving at a high rate of speed and that a significant amount of money had come out of the car and someone became suspicious," she said.

An internal investigation is also underway at the Cookeville Police Dept., Capt. Nathan Honeycutt told the H-C today.

James Smoak wonders about the logic of "a robber who would be tossing the money out of the car."

He also wonders about police procedure that would "take this insinuation from a citizen" and "turn it into what happened to us."

"Out there after they handcuffed us at gunpoint and put us in the police cars, they did not ask for ID, and later on, they actually released us just on my word about my identity, with only the confirmation by radio from an officer in Davidson County who was looking at my lost wallet and the ID in it down there," he said. "What if I actually had been a robber and not just a family man on vacation?"

His children hope they never come to Tennessee for another vacation.

"Poor Patton," said 13-year-old Jeb Smoak. "When he was killed out there, it was the first time I ever saw my brother, Brandon, cry. Brandon is the toughest person I've ever met, and he cried."

The other dog, a puppy named Cassie, was "trembling all over" after the ordeal, Jeb Smoak said.

"She's being real quiet today. She knows we're all grieving."

James Smoak, though still deeply upset today, said he understands that "the officer will say the dog was coming after him."

But it could all have been prevented, didn't have to happen, he is convinced.

In addition to telling his family's story to Capt. Randy Hoover, who "was very nice and very professional," and to a Cookeville Police official last night and to Mayor Womack today, Smoak also plans to tell his lawyer, he said.

"And I also want to tell it to the Tennessee Department of Tourism," he said.
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
67
Canada
I hope they get enuf to have the whole dept fired ..

what axxholes .. i think Scotty shud just beam these fockers to another planet
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,551
361
83
nc
in case anyone hasn't noticed, our country of late has been moving back toward a police state. i see it every day in court. police officers are becoming more aggressive on the streets, many times to the point of being downright belligerent. and god help you if you are black or hispanic. if you come into contact with police at night or in a remote location, more than likely the police will assumed that you are guilty of something and their job is to determine what. right now i represent a black police officer from out of state who went to a rural area to go fishing at night with his brother. when a local called authorities to report some "suspicious" persons in the area, he was approached, questioned, arrested, and held for three hours while police confirmed his identity. while captive, he was interrogated, kept tightly cuffed, and his car was towed in and ransacked. in the end, the cops felt like they needed to charge him with something to justify the arrest, so they charged him with failure to promptly identify himself. after he was released they called his superiors to complain of his "conduct unbecoming an officer" during his detention. yes, i sued. and yes, they will pay. but my point is that this was not an isolated event. a byproduct of the war on drugs is that the courts have given police more lattitude when detaining private citizens. the result has been that the police have become emboldened in their encounters, and in fact some have developed an "us vs them" mentality whereby on the streets the presumption of guilt prevails in encounters with the citizenry. and with the war on terrorism spinning to heighened frenzy, you may only expect this situation to get worse. i can hardly wait until i try traveling by air with these titanium screws i'm packing around now. it should be a real treat going through the metal detectors.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
44,735
2,655
113
On the course!
And no matter how you handicapped it, the dogs went 1-1 on that day.


I agree that there seems to be a knee-jerk response to some complaints made these days.

The police could have pepper sprayed the dog.
 
Last edited:

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,904
346
83
54
BG, KY, USA
That's not suprising to me. The Nashville cops and surrounding counties are total punks. They are rude and discourteous to the law abiding motorist. They are especially bad at events like games and concerts. Wouldn't suprise me at all if the cop was laughing.
 

Jhpga

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 23, 2001
350
0
0
Brentwood,Tn
Her's an update to that story.Tonight on the local news the lead story was.........Officer not accused of wrongdoing:eek: ..The Tennesse Highway Patrol has studied the videotape and found the officer was using self-defense cause the bulldog was coming at him.If you havent seen the tape.......it is horrible.He shoots the dog twice from less than 3 feet with a pump shotgun......Completly unbelievable!!!!!There were 6 offficers at the scene and they couldnt get control of a english bulldog.This is truly a case of cops overusing there power.The cop didnt hesitate on the tape..he never tried to move or anything..It was like he said to himself......If that dog comes out of that car at me.Im gonna kill it.All they had to do was shut the damn door......I really feel sorry for the 3 kids that saw their pet dog get murdered by our protecting police officers.
 

Skinar

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 17, 2000
592
0
0
Kentucky
I found I was double posting about the cops in the bar incident so I just changed this. You guys are way ahead of me.
 
Last edited:

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,904
346
83
54
BG, KY, USA
I saw that too, jhpga. My wife was going off. We both agreed that those cops are typical of the Nashville area jerk police force.

To clarify, I'm in no way a cop hater. I have great respect for police officers, and I know they must protect themselves. I have 2 good friends here that are policemen, and I know many more. Seems the trend in TN is not good. My dad once got a ticket for going 60 in a 55. The cop TOOK HIS LICENSE and said he would have to appear before the judge! :eek: :eek: A local saw this happen, took dad's ticket, and said he would take care of it. He was tired of the cops being jerks to tourists. He dropped off the license the next day where we were staying.
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
Far be it from me to defend cops, but one thing I'll say is that anyone opposed to the ACLU or "the liberal justice system" or Amnesty International defending criminals rights can take a little bit of blame when this kind of thing happens.

When those organizations are calling for restrictions on cop's abilities to search and seize without warrants, and to idenitfy themselves properly, and not to have power to order you around, THIS story is the kind of thing they're worried about. Not some murdering thug having his arm twisted too far, but THIS kind of thing.

You give more power to cops, and you sure do bust a few more bad guys, but you also are in greater danger of having this shit happen.

The other thing to keep in mind is that these cops thought these people were criminals. They didn't think they were speeders. They didn't have a judge and jury there to try them before they cuffed them.

Basically, it sounds like the cops followed procedures, and this turned into more of a tragedy than it should have because the dog was shot. That's it.

And in terms of shooting the dog...
Sure 6 cops could subdue a dog, but not necessarily without injury, and not without taking their attention away from the people they thought were criminals. If a person had come out of the car and come at the cops with a knife, the cops might have shot the person dead, too.

The fact of the matter is, cops shoot dogs when lives may be on the line.

A couple years ago there was a hostage situation in Baltimore (Joey Palcynski if anyone remembers) and the cops had to break into a nearby house to stake out the house where the hostages were. There was a barking dog in the house, and the cops shot it. Could they have caught it? Brought in animal control? Gone to a different house? Maybe, but a guy who had already killed two people had hostages across the street, and a dog doesn't mean so much in that case.

Finally, these things are real easy to look at from the comfort of a keyboard and say how cops 'should' have acted , but criminals run, criminals carry weapons, criminals have attack dogs. The cops were doing what they're allowed to do in this situation, and if you think that's too much, take it up with the "liberal criminal justice system", not the cops.
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
I have to agree with you Shrimp... on the THEORY of your arguement.... but not in this specific case.
The cops may have thought these people were felons, but WHY???

Answer? Because some "concerned mother" got on her phone and called in a crime with no basis of proof, just a wild ass guess! Was there any robbery/theft reported by anyone? nope.

A similar situation happened to my younger brother 2 months ago. He broke up with his girlfriend/fiance of about 3 years and she took it hard, so she called the cops and told them he was going to shoot her and then himself. She wasnt even at his house at the time. The cops showed up to his doorstep, yanked him out, cuffed him, raided the house and took his hunting rifles, then took him to the mental hospital for a overnight stay. The refused to release him until the next day at noon... during which time, he missed an important meeting at his place of employment with some customers that traveled cross country for a multi million dollar business transaction. They refused to give him a phone call or anything to let his work know he couldnt make it. End result? His boss told him not to bother coming back to work ever again.
And to top it all off, they gave him a bill of $1100 for his involuntary sleep over party with them!
Granted, its not the same as shooting a dog in front of kids... but the police went on a "concerned citizen's" accusation and never even bothered to listen to him at all.
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
I agree Marine.

The main point is that its just too tricky for people to always say, "the cops should have done this or should have done that."

Example, a little girl disappeared in Baltimore a few weeks ago. They had a suspect in custody, but didn't have enough to charge him with. They had to let him go, more evidence that turned up that pointed to him, and then they couldn't find him. Everyone was in an uproar, "How could they let him go? Couldn't they keep him in jail for a few more days? Etc. etc. etc." Well, you can't have it both ways. Sometimes you let guilty folks go, sometimes you hold innocent folks for too long.

If citizens have too few rights, you're going to have more cases like the Smoaks. If citizens have too many rights, you're going to have cases like this kidnapper in B-more.

It's a sliding scale, and its up to us to decide where we want to be on it. But people who want the cops to have a lot of power can't really complain when these things happen. The power of police to arrest someone (like your brother or the Smoaks) without much cause is a fact of life. Is it that way because of guys like Giuliani and Ashcroft giving law enforcement the power to do what they want?

I don't think its as easy as "yes" or "no" but we should at least keep things like the Smoaks in mind next time Ashcroft, or Bush, or whoever, is talking about ratting on your fellow citizens.
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,551
361
83
nc
shrimp, anyone that knows me will tell you i am anything but a aclu-type liberal. while i am a defense atty, i am from a four-generation military family and was a major crimes prosecutor in a large metro area. but i am here to tell you that this case was just plain wrong. this encounter was initiated by a citizen 911 call from a woman who reported that she was driving on the highway and saw a wallet full of money fly out of a car window close to her, and because of that she thought there might be a robbery going on. based upon that fact alone, the police elected to initiate a full felony stop of the vehicle, utilizing the tactics that everyone by now has seen on the police video. that decision was not only completely incompetent, it was in part motivated by the "game-day" mentality that spurs the urge some of these guys have to go into action. it epitomizes a mentality that has developed within some police units that all citizens should be completely submissive to their authority at all times now matter what. it is simply bullying elevated to official status, but made a little more frightening when the bullies have badges and guns.


i have a black friend that is a state law eforcement officer. he use to be assigned to our area but asked to be transferred after an incident involving his family. his wife, with his small child in the car, was taking a babysitter home to a poor area of town and was subject to a "traffic" stop by the local undercover drug unit. they pulled his wife and child from the car, put them on the ground, and proceeded to pull everything out of the car, including seats, while conducting a full felony search of the vehicle. when they found nothing, they packed up and left his family at roadside with their car piled next to them. what made my friend ask to be transferred was not that event, but rather when he went to the unit's supervisor, the man defended his men's conduct and advised that he would take no action on my friend's complaint.



these are not isolated events. they are indicative of a emerging trend in law enforcement that is encouraged through executive and judicial indifference. i'll guarantee you that the official response to this event will be for the state authorites to matter-of-factly assert that their men's action were completely justified and absolve themselves of any responsibility or liability. in order to be vindicated and compensated, the victim and his family will be subjected to years of litigation, as suing the state is no picnic.


i scare myself when i think of how i might have possible responded if my family was subjected to that kind of treatment by lawful authorities. and like i mentioned earlier, you haven't seen anything yet. once the war on terrorism expands withing our own borders, it's going to get worse before it gets better.
 

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
Wow, love the info that has been posted by many in here, but I do think the cop will have much time oh his hands in jail to
jerkit.gif
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,551
361
83
nc
ttm$. i'll promise you that there will be no criminal charges directed at the police.
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
You said it loophole, "these are not isolated events. they are indicative of a emerging trend in law enforcement that is encouraged through executive and judicial indifference".

That's kind of what I was trying to say. I think the cops were probably justified within the letter of the law.

However, I think the law is poor, and I think with Ashcroftian policies working their way into mainstream thinking, the laws are going to get worse. We implicitly tolerate the treatment of the Smoaks without realizing it when we support the "war on drugs", the "war on terror", the "war on illegal immigration" and all the other "wars" we have going on in our country. Even their use of the word "war" is the first step in getting us to allow rights to be given up.

"Oh, the cops broke down your door and shot your protective dog because you had some cocaine in your house? Well, it is a WAR on drugs. You should have been more careful since there's a WAR going on."

[oh -- and I forgot to mention, I found yyz's joke pretty damn funny.]
 
W

wondo

Guest
the funny thing is that some very educated and typically rational people seem to be all out in favor of ashcroft and his ideas. i find some of them rather scary, myself. they seem to mimmick the very 'religious' sensationalism of the groups we oppose -- or atleast what they do under the guise of religion.
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,904
346
83
54
BG, KY, USA
Yep, that dog sure looked like a menace being that it's tail was wagging and that it was so fat and had such short legs it could hardly run :rolleyes: The mom and dad also looked like brutal felons on the lam. This is way too low profile for Amnesty International or the ACLU. They don't care about normal people. marine, that's some story about your brother! Sounds like something out of a dictatorship. I'm sure the ACLU and Amnesty International were calling him offering their services too, right?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top