Troops 3/1 Mac

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
A poll by the Military Times newspaper group suggests that there is overwhelming support for John McCain among U.S. troops in every branch of the armed forces by a nearly 3-1 margin.

According to the poll, 68 percent of active-duty and retired servicemen and women support McCain, while 23 percent support Barack Obama. The numbers are nearly identical among officers and enlisted troops.Click here to see the raw data.

The Military Times, which publishes the Army Times, Navy Times, Marine Corps Times and Air Force Times, polled 80,000 subscribers from Sept 22 to Sept. 29. The non-scientific survey gathered 4,300 respondents -- all of them registered and eligible to vote.

A racial divide was immediately evident among the respondents. Nearly eight in 10 black servicemembers chose Obama, while McCain captured 76 percent of white voters and 63 percent of Hispanic voters.
Click here to see more on this story from FOX News.

Numbers among men and women respondents were also visibly different. Men overwhelmingly said they would vote for McCain, 70 percent to 22 percent. But among women the margin was much closer: 53 percent support McCain, while 36 percent support Obama.

U.S. troops also said in the poll that they prefer McCain to handle the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- 74 percent said McCain would perform better, while just 19 percent said Obama would.

Four years ago the Iraq War was the single most important issue on which the military voted. But the war now ranks third in importance to these voters. The most important issue among the respondents was character (42 percent), followed by the economy (25 percent) and the Iraq War (16 percent).

There was a racial divide on these issues, as well. Black servicemembers said the economy was the No. 1 issue that affected their vote, and white troops said character was paramount.
The Military Times offered certain caveats for its poll, which was open only to its 80,000 subscribers. Responses were entirely voluntary and were not focused on a representative sample of the public, as scientific polls are. The troops polled were also somewhat older than average enlisted servicemembers and included more officers than is representative of the military as a whole.

Yet judging by the numbers, it appears that the Democratic party has not made many inroads into the traditionally Republican military.

Click here for more on this story from the Military Times.

link containing data
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/21/poll-troops-support-mccain/

Would anyone finding the other media reporting on this pleasepost link--just curious. ;)

The ole character issue --glad someone agrees.
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Character?

Keating 5, divorce, cheating on wife, negative campaign, marrying for money, beer distributorship, anger problems?

Oh yeah, I forgot, republican definition of "character" = white, rich and no taxes.

Eddie
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
Character?

Keating 5, divorce, cheating on wife, negative campaign, marrying for money, beer distributorship, anger problems?

Oh yeah, I forgot, republican definition of "character" = white, rich and no taxes.

Eddie

believe everyone knows he was aquitted on 5 issue--believe they are aware of what liberal attorneys opinions worth too--

if aquitted--insinuate he was guilty
if guity and disbarred-insinuate -it was a blowjob.

==========================
the issue at hand is we know where troops stand--what I found more interesting was backing of hispanic--a huge key in nov.

if mac pulls just 50% he romps--however would take 45% in a heartbeat--as we know who the illegals that slip in will be for :)
who are the no voter ID advocates:shrug:
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Acquitted but apologized. Why apologize? 5 senators meeting with regulatory chief who is investigating Lincoln Savings owned by Charles Keating who happens to be huge donor to McCain campaign and happens to be friend of McCain. Nah, they didn't put any pressure on him.

Don't need my opinion. Those are the facts. Let everyone decide for themselves. I guess McCain and the other 4 senators were meeting with the regulatory guy to make dinner plans.

Obama will win in a landslide. You are already preparing your Lyndon Johnson 87 argument. Let me help you out so you can just copy and paste:

Acorn steals election for Obama. McCain won by several hundred thousand votes.

There you go. I don't know what is worse, getting illegals to vote or brainwashing millions of morons.

Eddie

Eddie
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Acquitted but apologized. Why apologize? 5 senators meeting with regulatory chief who is investigating Lincoln Savings owned by Charles Keating who happens to be huge donor to McCain campaign and happens to be friend of McCain. Nah, they didn't put any pressure on him.

Don't need my opinion. Those are the facts. Let everyone decide for themselves. I guess McCain and the other 4 senators were meeting with the regulatory guy to make dinner plans.

Obama will win in a landslide. You are already preparing your Lyndon Johnson 87 argument. Let me help you out so you can just copy and paste:

Acorn steals election for Obama. McCain won by several hundred thousand votes.

There you go. I don't know what is worse, getting illegals to vote or brainwashing millions of morons.

Eddie

Eddie

Eddie if Obama wins let me give you another talking point. If somehow Obama turns this country around the brainwashed buffoons will say that Bush handed Obama the beginning of a strong economy. They actually use this one with Bush senior :mj07: I even heard it out of that dirtbag Bush seniors mouth. By the way i hope the democrats are not this dumb but i see all the signs from 04 and Ohio right here in Pa. You watch come election night how it is now Pa that will be the big hold up. I see all the signs. Thank god we have a democratic govenrnor and one democratic senator that might curtail this movement. Saw Hannity for five minutes last night and they are gun ho with Pa for some reason. Pa is gonna be a problen and Obama is ten points up. Watch how the poles close in my state. Like i said earlier we got a whole new batch of those diebold machines in 06. Made me sick to my stomach when i saw them.
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Sponge:

I agree. They also have to treat the religous right as a mentally ill child. We can no longer have this country guided by a group that believes that the Flintstones was based on a true story. Eventually, the fairy tale will dissipate and no longer dictate domestic and foreign policy.

A secular US, diverse, based on fairness not greed, will require a phenomenal change. The coruption in office and in the boardrooms is like hardened dogshiit on your living room rug. It'll be hard to pry out of there. But we have to get rid of people like Mitch McConnel, John Boehner etc.

Eddie
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Good to know that being acquitted absolves any responsibility and should render scenarios not worrisome, Wayne. I'll remember that the next time you bring up Bill Ayres.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge:

I agree. They also have to treat the religous right as a mentally ill child. We can no longer have this country guided by a group that believes that the Flintstones was based on a true story. Eventually, the fairy tale will dissipate and no longer dictate domestic and foreign policy.

A secular US, diverse, based on fairness not greed, will require a phenomenal change. The coruption in office and in the boardrooms is like hardened dogshiit on your living room rug. It'll be hard to pry out of there. But we have to get rid of people like Mitch McConnel, John Boehner etc.

Eddie

If Obama gets in there i hope he has the sense to clean house and start from scratch. I wouldn't trust Cheney for a minute. He probably has his crooneys so embedded in places like the CIA and FBI that it is gonna take a huge brush to sweep all this shit out of the Gov't. My first order of business would be to sweep the Whitehouse for bugs then maybe take a drive over to that ranch in Crawford and see what kind of stuff that other rotten prick has that he shouldn't.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Was open only to 80000 subscribers. That sounds like only hard core military members. Surprise Surprise Natinal Guard not incuded. lets not mess up results we want to come out a certain way.
80000 out of 2 million. Im surprised they let Obama get 25%. I guess they had to make it look good.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
Good to know that being acquitted absolves any responsibility and should render scenarios not worrisome, Wayne. I'll remember that the next time you bring up Bill Ayres.

Do you know diff between aquitted on technicallity and found not quilty.

What about professed innocense and acknowledging guilt
and saying you wish you'd have done more.?

see any diff in either?

I beginning to wonder about you Chad
1st Pro wrestler as gov--then politicians swearing on koran--Al frankan in the thick of things
-- and now this comparison :)

All you need is Haskell as attorney General and cold cash Jefferson on your ethic board ;)
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne, you know I know the difference, it just seems you were very dismissive of McCain's being held to that situation for obvious reasons, and just running with the acquittal theme. Many think there is much more at play in that situation, and it's probably worthy of a thought or two.

Not comparing the two at all, just saying. And you cannot hold me responsible for Ventura, although I daresay his approach to government actually was pretty well reviewed by many, and probably along the lines of what most people claim they want in government and representation - no B.S., cutting through the politics and looking at things from a common sense perspective, being in nobody's pocket, speaking his mind, challengine conventional politics and opinion. I didn't vote for him because I knew of his background and deep-rooted opinions of many things, and his lack of intelligence and tact, and what I knew outsiders would think of Minnesotans.

I don't know who I am voting for for Senate, other than it certainly won't be Coleman, who I find reprehensible in many instances, and think is as corrupt and in the pocket as anyone. He was Bush's fall guy on the war and sucked up every chance he got, now backpedals at every instance. He was very much a liberal anti-war politician until he saw his opportunity to switch suits and be pumped financially from conservatives and St. Paulians. I dislike Coleman as much as any politician I've ever seen. I don't really care for Franken, either, as I think he is very liberal, a big time BS'er, and is pretty much a celebrity first, and I don't think he'll care too much about Minnesota in the real sense. He pretends to be like Wellstone, and covets that support, but there are no Wellstone's lately that I've seen. I may vote for the independent, who is a former senator and seems to be a pretty sensible guy. And I probably will vote for Pawlenty (the republican) again, as he showed me a lot in the government and medicine topic, and is a pretty decent guy from what I know.

From what I know, I'd be happy to have Eddie in our cabinet, but you can keep Jefferson, from what I know. But, do you REALLY want to get into ethics talk right now? :)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top