Trump's big win on relief orders ? here's why Pelosi, Schumer are so unhappy

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,204
475
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
Liz Peek: Trump's big win on relief orders ? here's why Pelosi, Schumer are so unhappy
foxnews ^ | Liz Peek


What a smackdown!

While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself.

He issued four executive orders that would extend modified unemployment relief to millions who are out of work, protect many from eviction, provide continued relief from student loan debt and suspend payroll taxes for employers and those earning less than $100,000.

This made House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Schumer very, very unhappy. Pelosi called Trump?s measures ?illusions.?

Sorry, Madam Speaker, for families in need, an extra $400 per week unemployment pay is absolutely real, and extremely welcome.

The president boxed the Democrats in ? how can they possibly challenge his orders or take his mandated benefits away from people? The chagrined duo whined that Trump ?still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families.?

On the contrary, the president understands the urgency very well, and also understands political hardball.

Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept.

Mainly, Pelosi and Schumer stonewalled because they want to torpedo the U.S. economy. Democrats know that creating jobs is Trump?s signature achievement, and also the most important issue to voters. By blocking the next round of stimulus, they intentionally undermined the financial security of tens of millions of Americans.

They don?t care; their priority is beating President Trump. The American people be damned.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,601
529
113
75
Liz Peek: Trump's big win on relief orders ? here's why Pelosi, Schumer are so unhappy
foxnews ^ | Liz Peek


What a smackdown!

While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself.

He issued four executive orders that would extend modified unemployment relief to millions who are out of work, protect many from eviction, provide continued relief from student loan debt and suspend payroll taxes for employers and those earning less than $100,000.

This made House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Schumer very, very unhappy. Pelosi called Trump?s measures ?illusions.?

Sorry, Madam Speaker, for families in need, an extra $400 per week unemployment pay is absolutely real, and extremely welcome.

The president boxed the Democrats in ? how can they possibly challenge his orders or take his mandated benefits away from people? The chagrined duo whined that Trump ?still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families.?

On the contrary, the president understands the urgency very well, and also understands political hardball.

Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept.

Mainly, Pelosi and Schumer stonewalled because they want to torpedo the U.S. economy. Democrats know that creating jobs is Trump?s signature achievement, and also the most important issue to voters. By blocking the next round of stimulus, they intentionally undermined the financial security of tens of millions of Americans.

They don?t care; their priority is beating President Trump. The American people be damned.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


Read more at foxnews.com ...:142smilie:142smilie
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Liz Peek: Trump's big win on relief orders ? here's why Pelosi, Schumer are so unhappy
foxnews ^ | Liz Peek


What a smackdown!

While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself.

He issued four executive orders that would extend modified unemployment relief to millions who are out of work, protect many from eviction, provide continued relief from student loan debt and suspend payroll taxes for employers and those earning less than $100,000.

This made House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Schumer very, very unhappy. Pelosi called Trump?s measures ?illusions.?

Sorry, Madam Speaker, for families in need, an extra $400 per week unemployment pay is absolutely real, and extremely welcome.

The president boxed the Democrats in ? how can they possibly challenge his orders or take his mandated benefits away from people? The chagrined duo whined that Trump ?still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families.?

On the contrary, the president understands the urgency very well, and also understands political hardball.

Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept.

Mainly, Pelosi and Schumer stonewalled because they want to torpedo the U.S. economy. Democrats know that creating jobs is Trump?s signature achievement, and also the most important issue to voters. By blocking the next round of stimulus, they intentionally undermined the financial security of tens of millions of Americans.

They don?t care; their priority is beating President Trump. The American people be damned.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

skulnutz thinking :

https://media1.tenor.com/images/044762a177dce80a4a6c95b93dfda3bc/tenor.gif?itemid=14092422
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
So what in the article isn't true?

:facepalm:

You can start with the first two sentences.

"What a smackdown!" - 1. You know you are in for some unbiased "reporting" when this is how the writer begins their article. 2. This is pure opinion and doesn't even make sense in the context. My response makes even more sense when you read my response to sentence two.

"While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself."

Pelosi and Schumer were pushing to help Americans get relief, not the other way around! This is a complete falsehood. The Republicans were blocking a bill that extended unemployment benefits and eviction protection.

 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,601
529
113
75
You can start with the first two sentences.

"What a smackdown!" - 1. You know you are in for some unbiased "reporting" when this is how the writer begins their article. 2. This is pure opinion and doesn't even make sense in the context. My response makes even more sense when you read my response to sentence two.

"While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself."

Pelosi and Schumer were pushing to help Americans get relief, not the other way around! This is a complete falsehood. The Republicans were blocking a bill that extended unemployment benefits and eviction protection.




....again with the friggin' truth..you are going to crush dreams!
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,339
392
83
72
WNY
You can start with the first two sentences.

"What a smackdown!" - 1. You know you are in for some unbiased "reporting" when this is how the writer begins their article. 2. This is pure opinion and doesn't even make sense in the context. My response makes even more sense when you read my response to sentence two.

"While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself."

Pelosi and Schumer were pushing to help Americans get relief, not the other way around! This is a complete falsehood. The Republicans were blocking a bill that extended unemployment benefits and eviction protection.

You forgot to deny and dismiss this....
"Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept."
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
You forgot to deny and dismiss this....
"Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept."

There is no point in reading further! That's my whole point. His source is writing a propaganda piece that isn't based in fact. Pelosi and Schumer wanted to take care of the public by extending the unemployment benefits and eviction protections. The Republicans said that was too much. This is not hard.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
You forgot to deny and dismiss this....
"Instead of compromising on legislation that would immediately help Americans pummeled by the coronavirus, Pelosi and Schumer prioritized issues that had nothing to do with the well-being of the nation. They pressed instead to ban ID requirements and signature verification for voters ? measures that, as the president noted, would encourage increased fraud in our elections, and that Republicans would never accept."

Okay, cockroach, I'm going to give you a chance to prove you aren't a complete moron. This should be really simple based on your post above.

Tell us, along with a reputable source, how many cases of voter fraud there were in the last presidential election. Out of 128,838,342, how many fraudulent votes were cast?

And, of those fraudulent votes, how many people were arrested and convicted?

No, cockroach, DUH? is not an answer.

Neither is Hannity said.

Nor Trump says

Proof. Facts. Arrests, Convictions. Facts, Truth. Got any, or are you just a bloviating bag of flatus, a fart in the wind?

Come on, cockroach, this is your chance to shine....or post BS and show your tiny little ass.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,339
392
83
72
WNY
Okay, cockroach, I'm going to give you a chance to prove you aren't a complete moron. This should be really simple based on your post above.

Tell us, along with a reputable source, how many cases of voter fraud there were in the last presidential election. Out of 128,838,342, how many fraudulent votes were cast?

And, of those fraudulent votes, how many people were arrested and convicted?

No, cockroach, DUH? is not an answer.

Neither is Hannity said.

Nor Trump says

Proof. Facts. Arrests, Convictions. Facts, Truth. Got any, or are you just a bloviating bag of flatus, a fart in the wind?

Come on, cockroach, this is your chance to shine....or post BS and show your tiny little ass.

You must think I have a legal team. You act like a house committee skank with a bunch of loaded questions.
https://www.heritage.org/election-i...ts-even-though-many-the-media-claim-it-doesnt
Hope this helps.If not,take the thumb out of your mouth and eat shit.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org

Why is it so hard for you to find a credible source? Shouldn't that be proof that you are on the wrong side of the truth?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/heritage-foundation/

<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: inherit; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(14, 36, 48);">[h=2]
right021.png
MBFCMixed.png
[/h]
[h=2]RIGHT BIAS[/h]</header>[FONT=&quot]These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
<amp-auto-ads type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910"></amp-auto-ads><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad>

  • Overall, we rate the Heritage Foundation Right Biased based on conservative policy positions as well as funding from right leaning organizations. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to promoting misleading claims regarding global warming and the health dangers associated with tobacco.
[/FONT]
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,339
392
83
72
WNY
Why is it so hard for you to find a credible source? Shouldn't that be proof that you are on the wrong side of the truth?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/heritage-foundation/

<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: inherit; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(14, 36, 48);">[h=2]
right021.png
MBFCMixed.png
[/h]
[h=2]RIGHT BIAS[/h]</header>[FONT=&quot]These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
<amp-auto-ads type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910"></amp-auto-ads><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad>

  • Overall, we rate the Heritage Foundation Right Biased based on conservative policy positions as well as funding from right leaning organizations. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to promoting misleading claims regarding global warming and the health dangers associated with tobacco.
[/FONT]

Oh thanks for your predictable response. Please provide the forum with your approved sources. Then go fuck your truculent self.
 

Attachments

  • cnn.png
    cnn.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 0

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,204
475
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
You can start with the first two sentences.

"What a smackdown!" - 1. You know you are in for some unbiased "reporting" when this is how the writer begins their article. 2. This is pure opinion and doesn't even make sense in the context. My response makes even more sense when you read my response to sentence two.

"While Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were blocking a bill to help Americans through the COVID-19 crisis, President Trump stepped up and got the job done, all by himself."

Pelosi and Schumer were pushing to help Americans get relief, not the other way around! This is a complete falsehood. The Republicans were blocking a bill that extended unemployment benefits and eviction protection.


That's just Stupid.

Hope this helps.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Oh thanks for your predictable response. Please provide the forum with your approved sources. Then go fuck your truculent self.

You post complete shit from unreliable sources. This isn't a Facebook echo chamber where you won't get challenged for posting nonsense.

Colorado is 100% Mail In Voting. Five states are majority Mail In Voting. Keep looking for the needle in the haystack that proves your ridiculous premise.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,339
392
83
72
WNY
You post complete shit from unreliable sources. This isn't a Facebook echo chamber where you won't get challenged for posting nonsense. Tha

Colorado is 100% Mail In Voting. Five states are majority Mail In Voting. Keep looking for the needle in the haystack that proves your ridiculous premise.
or

You're defending something the democrats need 25 billion to prepare the postal system for.Can't be a very reliable system if it needs that much money to fix.Too bad Trump wont put up with that extortion.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
or

You're defending something the democrats need 25 billion to prepare the postal system for.Can't be a very reliable system if it needs that much money to fix.Too bad Trump wont put up with that extortion.

Do you know how stupid you sound arguing that mail in voting won't work when it is already in place and has been working great for years?

Trump has already praised Absentee Ballots. The dirty little secret: Mail In Voting and Absentee Voting are............one in the same. The only argument is whether the registered voter needs to request one or if all registered voters will be sent a ballot automatically.

I think I've made the case that you're an uninformed dipshit. Thanks for the opportunity.
 

Cricket

sporadic wins
Forum Member
Nov 25, 2005
5,339
392
83
72
WNY
Do you know how stupid you sound arguing that mail in voting won't work when it is already in place and has been working great for years?


Not on the scale of this magnitude.You're a pompous ass who must think you're infallible like the Pope.
Too bad you won't get you're voter fraud shit show, like the Russian hoax,impeachment,and all the other waste of American time and money shit shows that failed. You don't have much to stand on when the policy is only nail Trump to the cross at every turn.
Good luck with Kamala the chameleon .She'll turn any self promoting issue into a shit show and then deny it too.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,287
1,498
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Not on the scale of this magnitude.You're a pompous ass who must think you're infallible like the Pope.
Too bad you won't get you're voter fraud shit show, like the Russian hoax,impeachment,and all the other waste of American time and money shit shows that failed. You don't have much to stand on when the policy is only nail Trump to the cross at every turn.
Good luck with Kamala the chameleon .She'll turn any self promoting issue into a shit show and then deny it too.

Just one excuse after another! Keep them coming! :mj07:

It's going to happen, and it isn't good for Republicans. :thefinger
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top