These two heavyweights go saturday night.
Moorer 43-2-1 with losses to Foreman and Holyfield. 78" reach.
Tua 40-3 with losses to Lewis, Byrd, and Ibeabuchi. 69.5" reach.
Of course everyone Tua fights has a better reach.
For picking purposes, we'll say Moorer is about 2-1 (with the vig its about +170/-220 right now).
A lot of guys who have fought Tua have said, "I thought he hit harder than he does." He really hasn't been able to beat any good fighters. Admittedly, I don't know much about Fres Oquendo, but I don't think he ran his record to 20-0 by beating class. Even Rahman was beating Tua before Tua hit him after the bell. In the next round, Rahman was still stunned and got beat. Tua doesn't look good against guys who can actually fight and Moorer can actually fight.
Moorer had the lay-off between 1997 (when he lost to George) and 2000. He's boxed fine since his return but he hasn't really faced anyone either. He was a talent, though, beating Holyfield in a MD, Shultz and Botha. He has boxed since he was a boy and I think well-trained fighters such as himself give Tua problems.
If Tua is fighting someone he can't get the left hook in on, he can easily be outpointed. However, Moorer did get KO'd by Foreman (still a strong puncher at 44 or whatever) and Holyfield (not considered a real heavy puncher and he knocked MM down several times), so one questions his chin.
The line seems high. I don't know if it is because Tua is more recognizable or if I'm overlooking something. I like that price on Moorer, though. This week, I think I'll wait till saturday to make a wager. Last couple of fights, I've had reservations at the last minute about who I bet on.
Early lean on Moorer at +170, though. By decision. Not carved in stone. I want to look a little more into some of his recent opponents, and how Tua has done against southpaws.
TheShrimp
Moorer 43-2-1 with losses to Foreman and Holyfield. 78" reach.
Tua 40-3 with losses to Lewis, Byrd, and Ibeabuchi. 69.5" reach.
Of course everyone Tua fights has a better reach.
For picking purposes, we'll say Moorer is about 2-1 (with the vig its about +170/-220 right now).
A lot of guys who have fought Tua have said, "I thought he hit harder than he does." He really hasn't been able to beat any good fighters. Admittedly, I don't know much about Fres Oquendo, but I don't think he ran his record to 20-0 by beating class. Even Rahman was beating Tua before Tua hit him after the bell. In the next round, Rahman was still stunned and got beat. Tua doesn't look good against guys who can actually fight and Moorer can actually fight.
Moorer had the lay-off between 1997 (when he lost to George) and 2000. He's boxed fine since his return but he hasn't really faced anyone either. He was a talent, though, beating Holyfield in a MD, Shultz and Botha. He has boxed since he was a boy and I think well-trained fighters such as himself give Tua problems.
If Tua is fighting someone he can't get the left hook in on, he can easily be outpointed. However, Moorer did get KO'd by Foreman (still a strong puncher at 44 or whatever) and Holyfield (not considered a real heavy puncher and he knocked MM down several times), so one questions his chin.
The line seems high. I don't know if it is because Tua is more recognizable or if I'm overlooking something. I like that price on Moorer, though. This week, I think I'll wait till saturday to make a wager. Last couple of fights, I've had reservations at the last minute about who I bet on.
Early lean on Moorer at +170, though. By decision. Not carved in stone. I want to look a little more into some of his recent opponents, and how Tua has done against southpaws.
TheShrimp

