TWO WINNER FOR SUNDAY$$$$ 2-0

RAYMOND

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2000
45,832
1,217
113
usa
ROCKIES
D BACK
TWO TEAM PARLAY OF THE MONTH
$1720 TO WIN $1820

9 TEAM PARLAY
HORNETS-2.5
TOR -1.5
OAKLAND
ANGELS
CLEVLAND
TWINS
W SOX
GAINTS
SD PARDES

$100 TO WIN $18673

THAT HOW I AM GOING TODAY

[This message has been edited by RAYMOND (edited 05-13-2001).]
 

The_Game

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2001
26
0
0
Westampton, New Jersey
Hey Ray, good job last night with the Giants, pounded it hard, do you like these 2 plays as much as the giants last night? That game was easy money, like you said...thanks ray
 

Timbobcc

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 31, 2001
13
0
0
Ray,
If you took a $100 parlay, you would only win $210, right? Now if that's true why not just put $100 on each of them? Am I missing something?


------------------
Tuff Shit!
 

s7ven

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
43
0
0
Portugal
I know the question wasn't for me, but I hope to help.

Well, in some way you are right about playing both games as a single instead of a parlay, but in my opinion isn't the right thing for 2 reasons:

1st - If you play both singles and taking a remote chance of both games fail, you will lose 200$.
Now the question is: It worth to bet on single games with these odds?
My opinion it's not.


2nd - If you play both as single and one game fails, you will lose around 50$.
If you play them in a parlay, you will lose 100, so in term of comparison, if you play a parlay with these 2 teams, you will lose 50$ more than if you play singles.
Personally I bellieve the difference between -50$ or -100$ isn't such big to prefer play these games as singles.

I hope I helped something

ps: Sorry for some grammar or english errors, but I try my best to type correctly in English, but I believe it'd be harder for you to type in portuguese
smile.gif


Originally posted by DEWMAN:
Ray,
If you took a $100 parlay, you would only win $210, right? Now if that's true why not just put $100 on each of them? Am I missing something?


 

AzRusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 16, 2000
443
0
0
73
Surprise, AZ, USA
Thanks for the Giants play yesterday Ray. I hit it hard. Glad it won!

Am going to hit this one hard too! Sure hope you are right.........
smile.gif


I appreciate your efforts.

Randy
 

Palmetto Pimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
2,270
17
38
48
Jax
DEWMAN....a $100 parlay on these two would get you $111 not $210.
s7ven....$100 on each team will lose you $440 total
Thats is why ray is parlaying these two to avoid the disaster of 0-2.
 

s7ven

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
43
0
0
Portugal
Well, if I'm not wrong, alot of american bookies have to chance to bet on. or to win 100, or to bet 100, for example. so if he places 100 per bet, in worst case, he'd lose 200$

Am I missing something?


Originally posted by njsf25g:
DEWMAN....a $100 parlay on these two would get you $111 not $210.
s7ven....$100 on each team will lose you $440 total
Thats is why ray is parlaying these two to avoid the disaster of 0-2.
 

s7ven

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
43
0
0
Portugal
Weel, for example Olympic offer that.

or you place your stakes in Risk option, or Win Option, but I still don't understand why you told he would lose 440$

If he bet 100$ single, in worse case he lose 200$, so you confused me a bit.


Originally posted by njsf25g:
No...I have never known an american bookie to work like that.
 

fixed odds

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
77
0
0
60
Toronto canada
You guys are starting to concuse me .
just lay the hundred and collect the two-ten

risk 100
=
reward 210

------------------
I just want to be a Dime playa
 

AzRusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 16, 2000
443
0
0
73
Surprise, AZ, USA
Laying 100 on:

Arizona Diamondbacks -240

Colorado Rockies -220

Pays $106.06

The payout is not like a parlay with a spread bet which pays 13 to 5 which is 2.6 to 1. A money line parlay such as this one pays approximately 1:1

AzRusty
 

RAYMOND

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2000
45,832
1,217
113
usa
ODDSMAKERS DO NOT WENT US TO BET ON THESE GAMES MONEY IS MONEY $$$$$
 

s7ven

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
43
0
0
Portugal
Th difference it's that you are not betting 100$ per single.
You are betting 220$ single, and that was the confusion.

I was speaking in comparison of risking 100$ or the parlay with 100$ single bets, and then you came here and changed the numbers


Now, at least I understood the confusion

For the rest of the guys sorry for these post without any value on it

Originally posted by njsf25g:
If you are laying 220 each game to win $200, 0-2 would be -$440.
 

coot149

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
164
0
0
ray, would it be safe to take each team -1.5? i hate giving runs but....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top