this is unbelievable, with all of the money spent to upgrade the security systems in the us airports & this still happens. i find this alarming!!
Bombs' get past airport security
Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
Los Angeles Times
May. 11, 2003 12:00 AM
WASHINGTON - Under- cover agents continue regularly to sneak mock bombs and weapons past federal airport security screeners, despite the $5 billion a year taxpayers are spending to safeguard aviation, government and industry officials say.
The Transportation Security Administration refused to discuss specific undercover testing results and methods, but said the inspections are much tougher than those conducted before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"In the old days, the test items consisted of things you might see in a Wile E. Coyote cartoon," administration spokesman Robert Johnson. The agents' "job now is to go out and break the system, so we can improve the system."
The failures have alarmed lawmakers overseeing the agency, who point out that al-Qaida operatives also would be expected to use sophisticated subterfuge to get weapons and explosives aboard an airliner.
"If the tests are tougher and the screeners are still failing, then we've got a problem," said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., chairman of the House aviation subcommittee. "The feedback I'm getting is that results aren't much different than when we had a private workforce."
Mica has asked Congress' watchdog agency, the General Accounting Office, to evaluate the performance of Transportation Security Administration screeners and its undercover testing program.
Several federal screeners said the problem is insufficient training.
"It's real easy to spot scissors, but people who want to get weapons on board are going to be more clever," a screener at Los Angeles International Airport said. "We are not getting familiar with the stuff I think we need to get familiar with, particularly explosives."
Some screeners also said that the agency took on some screeners who don't take the job seriously.
Bombs' get past airport security
Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
Los Angeles Times
May. 11, 2003 12:00 AM
WASHINGTON - Under- cover agents continue regularly to sneak mock bombs and weapons past federal airport security screeners, despite the $5 billion a year taxpayers are spending to safeguard aviation, government and industry officials say.
The Transportation Security Administration refused to discuss specific undercover testing results and methods, but said the inspections are much tougher than those conducted before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"In the old days, the test items consisted of things you might see in a Wile E. Coyote cartoon," administration spokesman Robert Johnson. The agents' "job now is to go out and break the system, so we can improve the system."
The failures have alarmed lawmakers overseeing the agency, who point out that al-Qaida operatives also would be expected to use sophisticated subterfuge to get weapons and explosives aboard an airliner.
"If the tests are tougher and the screeners are still failing, then we've got a problem," said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., chairman of the House aviation subcommittee. "The feedback I'm getting is that results aren't much different than when we had a private workforce."
Mica has asked Congress' watchdog agency, the General Accounting Office, to evaluate the performance of Transportation Security Administration screeners and its undercover testing program.
Several federal screeners said the problem is insufficient training.
"It's real easy to spot scissors, but people who want to get weapons on board are going to be more clever," a screener at Los Angeles International Airport said. "We are not getting familiar with the stuff I think we need to get familiar with, particularly explosives."
Some screeners also said that the agency took on some screeners who don't take the job seriously.
