Unreal

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
51
So I heard my first bit of lunacy from the right today since the Obama election. My brain can't seriously compute statements like this.

(NOTE: I don't actively seek out things like this, so this leads to this being so shocking to me)

One of my wife's friends told her that now that Obama is elected, he and Pelosi were going to, as their first order of business, ban all "conservative" radio and tv programs.

Once that is complete, they are going to ensure that from now on every person's voting records will be made public information.

:142smilie
 

flapjack

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,244
7
0
Actually, I think she must have misunderstood a couple real issues or maybe you misheard? I think she must have been refering to these 2 issues this shithead Schumer is talking about:

Leading The News

Schumer on Fox: Fairness Doctrine ?fair and balanced?
By Bob Cusack
Posted: 11/04/08 11:30 AM [ET]
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defended the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an interview on Fox News, saying, ?I think we should all be fair and balanced, don?t you??

Schumer?s comments echo other Democrats? views on reviving the Fairness Doctrine, which would require radio stations to balance conservative hosts with liberal ones.

Asked if he is a supporter of telling radio stations what content they should have, Schumer used the fair and balanced line, claiming that critics of the Fairness Doctrine are being inconsistent.

?The very same people who don?t want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air. I am for that? But you can?t say government hands off in one area to a commercial enterprise but you are allowed to intervene in another. That?s not consistent.?

In 2007, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a close ally of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told The Hill, ?It?s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they?re in a better position to make a decision.?

Senate Rules Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last year said, ?I believe very strongly that the airwaves are public and people use these airwaves for profit. But there is a responsibility to see that both sides and not just one side of the big public questions of debate of the day are aired and are aired with some modicum of fairness.?

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would cut into profits so significantly that radio executives would opt to scale back on conservative radio programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from the FCC.

They also note that conservative radio shows has been far more successful than liberal ones.

In his Fox interview, Schumer, who heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, also weighed in on the election, predicting that Democrats will end up with between 56 and 58 seats in the Senate.

He also defended ?card check? legislation, claiming there is a strong need to allow workers to cast a public ballot on whether they support the formation of a union.
Schumer said ?there has to be some counter? to the leverage businesses have, claiming ?employers have every leg up on people who want to organize and that?s why union workers have gone down from about 25 percent to 6 percent [in the private sector].?

Business groups adamantly oppose the card check bill, which passed the House and fell short of the necessary votes to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.


The goal is to silence conservative radio - the one medium (as opposed to TV and internet) where the conservatives have an advantage.

The open ballots are for union votes. Unions have always been critical to Dem's success and this will strengthen their power of the workers.

Now that they are in power, they will look to silence critics and tighten ranks. These two laws will help greatly.
 

TontoKowalski

BoomOuttaHere
Forum Member
Apr 26, 2008
1,927
0
0
U.S. American
thanks for what? the wench who started this probably still is running around thinking in a year everyone will know who she voted for (like anyone cares, and its obviously mccain anyway) and that conservative radio will be "banned"

she should just jump off a bridge
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
I hope they don't try to pass that fairness doctrine. It was like that before 1984, but there is no going back. Political media is an industry now. I hate most of it, it's silly to try to get rid of it at this point.
 

justin22g

WAR EAGLE!
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2005
1,809
1
0
Birmingham, AL
So I heard my first bit of lunacy from the right today since the Obama election. My brain can't seriously compute statements like this.

(NOTE: I don't actively seek out things like this, so this leads to this being so shocking to me)

One of my wife's friends told her that now that Obama is elected, he and Pelosi were going to, as their first order of business, ban all "conservative" radio and tv programs.

Once that is complete, they are going to ensure that from now on every person's voting records will be made public information.

:142smilie

hahahaha

what about the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 14th amendments?:shrug: :shrug:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top