US to respond to N Korea missles launch

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
U.S. Ready to Respond to N.Korea Missile
Admiral Keating Tells ABC News U.S. Prepared to Shoot Down Missile If Obama Gives OK
By MARTHA RADDATZ and LAUREN SHER
Feb. 26, 2009

SHARE In an exclusive interview with ABC News' Martha Raddatz, Adm. Timothy Keating, head of the U.S. Pacific Commands, said that the military is prepared to shoot down any North Korean ballistic missile -- if President Obama should give the order.

Adm. Keating describes U.S. preparedness for possible missile test."If a missile leaves the launch pad we'll be prepared to respond upon direction of the president," Keating told ABC News. "I'm not a betting man but I'd go like 60/40, 70/30 that it will, they will attempt to launch a satellite. There's equipment moving up there that would indicate the preliminary stages of preparation for a launch. So I'd say it's more than less likely."

"Should it look like it's not a satellite launch -- that it's something other than a satellite launch -- we'll be ready to respond."

Intelligence reports suggest that North Korea is preparing a long-range missile test. Earlier this week, North Korea announced its plans to send a satellite into orbit as part of its space program.

However, many in the international community assert that North Korea's satellite test is simply a means of concealing a long-range missile test -- a move that would flare existing tension in the region.

The US military is ready t respond with at least five different systems: destroyer, Aegis cruiser, radar, space-based system and ground-based interceptor. All of these work in conjunction with one another to protect against any missile threat.

Destroyers are fast, multi-purpose warships that can be used in almost any type of naval operation. They would likely play a defensive role, helping to repel an air attack and offering a platform for gunfire and missiles to hit airborne objects.

The Aegis cruiser is part of the Navy's computer-based command and control system that integrates radar and missiles to fight against land, air and sea attacks. For Keating, the Aegis combat system can tracks threats and counter any short- or medium-range missiles.

Radars vary in type and design, but the military would likely employ a range of sea-based and early warning radars to detect the presence of a North Korean missile, track warheads' movement and more easily home in on the position of a missile to knock it down.

Space-based infrared system is a defense system that provides warning of any missile launches, detecting the threat and employing other tools to obliterate it.

Ground-based interceptor is a weapon that seeks and destroys incoming ballistic missiles outside of the earth's atmosphere. Its sensors give the military the ability to locate and obliterate a North Korean missile.

"We will be fully prepared to respond as the president directs," Keating said. "Everything that we need to be ready is ready. So that's ready twice in one sentence, but we're not kidding, it doesn't take much for us to be fully postured to respond."
..........................................................


OK lets remember when George W was in the same situation. N Korea strutting their stuff threatening to launch a missle test.

George W - Look dont do that. We will send you 500 million dollars and you can buy some more Sony products and lobsters. We will help you feed your people. The US is your friend.

Alot of fawking good that did.

Obama - Change we can believe in.

No terrorists attacks in 40 days.

No designated vacations since in office .

Obama has worked more in 40 days than George W did in 2 years.

This is a much better way to deal with crazy leaders the likes they have in N Korea.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
U.S. Ready to Respond to N.Korea Missile
Admiral Keating Tells ABC News U.S. Prepared to Shoot Down Missile If Obama Gives OK
By MARTHA RADDATZ and LAUREN SHER
Feb. 26, 2009

.

The US military is ready t respond with at least five different systems: destroyer, Aegis cruiser, radar, space-based system and ground-based interceptor. All of these work in conjunction with one another to protect against any missile threat.

Destroyers are fast, multi-purpose warships that can be used in almost any type of naval operation. They would likely play a defensive role, helping to repel an air attack and offering a platform for gunfire and missiles to hit airborne objects.

The Aegis cruiser is part of the Navy's computer-based command and control system that integrates radar and missiles to fight against land, air and sea attacks. For Keating, the Aegis combat system can tracks threats and counter any short- or medium-range missiles.

Radars vary in type and design, but the military would likely employ a range of sea-based and early warning radars to detect the presence of a North Korean missile, track warheads' movement and more easily home in on the position of a missile to knock it down.

Space-based infrared system is a defense system that provides warning of any missile launches, detecting the threat and employing other tools to obliterate it.

Ground-based interceptor is a weapon that seeks and destroys incoming ballistic missiles outside of the earth's atmosphere. Its sensors give the military the ability to locate and obliterate a North Korean missile.

"We will be fully prepared to respond as the president directs," Keating said. "Everything that we need to be ready is ready. So that's ready twice in one sentence, but we're not kidding, it doesn't take much for us to be fully postured to respond."
..........................................................


.

.


wait a minute....barack said that he was disbanding the anti-missile systems?......

and anyway,those systems don`t work.....just ask kosar....

that damned bush...lol;)
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
submarines can launch


Destroyers can launch

Remember the test about a year ago where they knocked that missile out of the sky.

I said along time ago that if N Korea wants to launch a missle , the US should send a unarmed nuke right into their capitol city just so they get the fawking message. You going to be crazy , we can be crazy like that.

GO OBAMA !

CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN !

PS - Meanwhile Bush sitting at home watching TV.

why didnt I think of doing that ?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
submarines can launch


Destroyers can launch

GO OBAMA !

CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN !

PS - Meanwhile Bush sitting at home watching TV.

why didnt I think of doing that ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU4sVQV3Lhk

naivety to the nth degree...


you can thank bush for pursuing the stretegic defense initiative ...if not,those "launching submarines " and "destroyers" would be a figment of your imagination,scottie...

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/12/17/bush.missile/index.html



:nutkick... g`night to my friends in the moonbat hierarchy here in the forum....:D
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
"can thank bush for pursuing the stretegic defense initiative ...if not,those "launching submarines " and "destroyers" would be a figment of your imagination,scottie... "

holy shit. WTF is the "Bush Strategic Defense Initiative" and what has it contributed to our missile
defense capabilities? I guess you are thinking of the failed SDI project under Reagan? Sorry you are so fucking confused.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
wait a minute....barack said that he was disbanding the anti-missile systems?......

and anyway,those systems don`t work.....just ask kosar....

that damned bush...lol;)

Right. These 'systems' have never been proven to work at all. If North Korea fires a satellite/missile, we have no ability to 'shoot it down.'
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
"can thank bush for pursuing the stretegic defense initiative ...if not,those "launching submarines " and "destroyers" would be a figment of your imagination,scottie... "

holy shit. WTF is the "Bush Strategic Defense Initiative" and what has it contributed to our missile
defense capabilities? I guess you are thinking of the failed SDI project under Reagan? Sorry you are so fucking confused.

http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/FY08Patriot.pdf

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYKNf5janYHfOLxdsRH__KSNXVNw

obviously the japanese are delusional...and putin,who is throwing a major hissy over our implementation of a missile defense system in europe is delusional...

japan and putin are clueless....listen to kosar...he`s the expert..

it`s a moot point anyway,being that nobama plans on shitcanning any future funding bbasically stopping the program in it`s tracks.....

manchurian candidate indeed...
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/FY08Patriot.pdf

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYKNf5janYHfOLxdsRH__KSNXVNw

obviously the japanese are delusional...and putin,who is throwing a major hissy over our implementation of a missile defense system in europe is delusional...

japan and putin are clueless....listen to kosar...he`s the expert..

it`s a moot point anyway,being that nobama plans on shitcanning any future funding bbasically stopping the program in it`s tracks.....

manchurian candidate indeed...

Putin is worried about us increasing our military presence in what was Russias sphere of influence.

His resistance to us setting up 'systems' in Poland is not anywhere near a confirmation that he thinks these 'defensive' systems would work.

WTF kind of sense does that make?

For that matter, wtf kind of sense does it make when we say that we want to put the 'shields' there to protect Russia from Iran?

How ridiculous is that?
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/FY08Patriot.pdf

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYKNf5janYHfOLxdsRH__KSNXVNw

obviously the japanese are delusional...and putin,who is throwing a major hissy over our implementation of a missile defense system in europe is delusional...

japan and putin are clueless....listen to kosar...he`s the expert..

it`s a moot point anyway,being that nobama plans on shitcanning any future funding bbasically stopping the program in it`s tracks.....

manchurian candidate indeed...

Obviously everyone in the world is delusional except for the one who goes by 'Gardenweasel'. He can be cound at madjacksports.com.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
Putin is worried about us increasing our military presence in what was Russias sphere of influence.

His resistance to us setting up 'systems' in Poland is not anywhere near a confirmation that he thinks these 'defensive' systems would work.

?

no...of course not.

.the tests are working...other countries are joining us in instituting and improving the technology.......

but,of course in the eyes of the left it all equals total failure.....every military success is a failure in the bizarro world......:rolleyes:

and smurph.....i would agree that i can be "cound" at madjacks(iif i knew what "cound" meant)....:D
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
no...of course not.

.the tests are working...other countries are joining us in instituting and improving the technology.......

but,of course in the eyes of the left it all equals total failure.....every military success is a failure in the bizarro world......:rolleyes:

In the eyes of the 'left' (lol), it amounts to a total waste of money(since Reagan and his SDI nonsense) and it makes America look absolutely ridiculous when 'we' claim that we only want to protect Europe, including Russia, from Irans non-existent ballistic missiles.

I'm sure Irans main priority is attacking Europe. Yeah, that makes sense.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
In the eyes of the 'left' (lol), it amounts to a total waste of money(since Reagan and his SDI nonsense) and it makes America look absolutely ridiculous when 'we' claim that we only want to protect Europe, including Russia, from Irans non-existent ballistic missiles.

I'm sure Irans main priority is attacking Europe. Yeah, that makes sense.

..................................................................

it was all a farce by Bush and Cheney

they had the contractors in their pockets. They would have made another 500 million each. They just couldnt get it done in time.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
In the eyes of the 'left' (lol), it amounts to a total waste of money(since Reagan and his SDI nonsense) and it makes America look absolutely ridiculous when 'we' claim that we only want to protect Europe, including Russia, from Irans non-existent ballistic missiles.

I'm sure Irans main priority is attacking Europe. Yeah, that makes sense.

you obviously missed every link i posted regarding our(and japan`s) success with the missile defense program...

as i`ve stated many times before,"you can`t wake a man who`s pretending to be asleep"..
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
looks like Gates says the US will not interfere with a launch by N Korea.

Japan is set up to give it a go if they think its coming over them.

I think the US might be bluffing though. If you have the intention of knocking the missle down, you dont tell the N Koreans that so they can try something we might not expect.

Not sure if they would invade S Korea if someone does hit their missle.

Then we would be in 3 wars at once.

Man I bet George W is really missing all the excitement.
 

I LOVE WR

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 24, 2002
874
6
0
toronto canada
Kosar said

Kosar said

Putin is worried about us increasing our military presence

Now thats funny K.

North Korea isnt too worried about the USA's opnion anymore.

The Roman Empire look similar.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
you obviously missed every link i posted regarding our(and japan`s) success with the missile defense program...

as i`ve stated many times before,"you can`t wake a man who`s pretending to be asleep"..


Wake me up when we, or Japan, 'intercepts' this missile.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Putin is worried about us increasing our military presence

Now thats funny K.

Ummm...I think it's beyond obvious.

What's your opinion on why Putin is against us putting 'missile defense systems' in his backyard, with America claiming to just want to defend Russia and the rest of Europe from Iran?

Looking forward to your take.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
Note your time lines scott-

U.S. Ready to Respond to N.Korea Missile
Admiral Keating Tells ABC News U.S. Prepared to Shoot Down Missile If Obama Gives OK
By MARTHA RADDATZ and LAUREN SHER
Feb. 26, 2009

Today
looks like Gates says the US will not interfere with a launch by N Korea.

other points of interest-

O just gets elected and Iran test him firing their "satelite"

Russia immediately backs O down on missle defence

Now NK bending him over in the Kum Ba Ya

and Iran sending their people to help ;)

From Times Online
<!-- this will be populated from CMS --><!-- BEGIN: Module - Advert:Top --><!-- For Travel Search --><!--SECTION:parameter parameter="dart.server" /--><!-- END: Module - Advert:Top -->
March 29, 2009


Iran missile experts in North Korea 'to help with rocket launch'

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5994905.ece

--Didn't take them long to get his #.
60 days and
Terrorists--Iran-Russia and NK :00hour

oops forgot--O says they aren't terrorist any more--

In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department's office of security review noted that "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT.] Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' "


 

RAYMOND

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2000
45,648
959
113
usa
Note your time lines scott-

U.S. Ready to Respond to N.Korea Missile
Admiral Keating Tells ABC News U.S. Prepared to Shoot Down Missile If Obama Gives OK
By MARTHA RADDATZ and LAUREN SHER
Feb. 26, 2009

Today
looks like Gates says the US will not interfere with a launch by N Korea.

other points of interest-

O just gets elected and Iran test him firing their "satelite"

Russia immediately backs O down on missle defence

Now NK bending him over in the Kum Ba Ya

and Iran sending their people to help ;)

From Times Online
<!-- this will be populated from CMS --><!-- BEGIN: Module - Advert:Top --><!-- For Travel Search --><!--SECTION:parameter parameter="dart.server" /--><!-- END: Module - Advert:Top -->
March 29, 2009


Iran missile experts in North Korea 'to help with rocket launch'

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5994905.ece

--Didn't take them long to get his #.
60 days and
Terrorists--Iran-Russia and NK :00hour

oops forgot--O says they aren't terrorist any more--

In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department's office of security review noted that "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT.] Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' "




they know obama weak, obama worry about marck madness:mj07: and stealing the silverware
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top