Wed games

[gsp]

My par bit the dust last night. Mia still can't score and Odom getting hurt in the 1st qt didn't help.

Here's a little tidbit that you might consider before you play Minn or Sac tonight. Historically (that means a very long time), in the month of Oct, double digit dogs have covered around 85% of the time. If you like going against those odds then jump right in.

Right now I am pretty sure I will be on Chi, NO u and am looking real close at NY u. Will stick my neck out and say the first game or the last game tonight will go over. Back with my plays in a while.

 

[Billy Barooooooo]

I like the first game to go over and the last game to go under tonight. Like your NY play. Staying off the Chicago play, alot of players seem to be on them.

Thanks
BB

 

[jjb]

joe,
just a quick question:
are you proposing that IF 1st game goes over last game goes under and vice versa?

or are they not correlated?

 

[gsp]

It was a high per centage play last year. Also, the third game goes like the first. Now that I've posted that, it will probably change.

A think a pretty good ML play tonight might be Ind to win. How's this for scheduling. Det fires Carlisle, Bird hires Carlisle, Det has to play Ind on opening night. Great fodder for the announcers and the closer the game the better.

The Chi game is a total mis-match tonight. Pippen back and the young players are a year older and should be a lot smarter. Stackhouse is out and Arenas will have to carry the load. Pippen will start but I thinks that is mostly for show and leadership. This Chi team looked pretty good at the end of last year and should be even better now. Home team, first game of the year, a win sells more tickets and 5 to 6 don't look that big.

 

[big red]

gsp, are the order of the games, considered the same as the order on the sheet?

game 1 miami-boston
game 3 orlando-knicks
last game dallas-golden state

thanks for your time

 

[gsp]

Time first, home city second. Chi bulls will come before Cle if they start at the same time. I don't know why some list them in a different order.

 

[big red]

then it is my understandinding that the cleveland at sacramento is the last game of the night?

 

[Spreader]

Very interesting! Is this right then?

game 1 miami-boston OV
game 3 milw-minn OV
last game dallas-golden state UN

 

[gsp]

Going with

Chi - 5'
Cle + 11'

GS comes after Sac because they were the San Francisco Warriors first and that comes after Sac. Now, why New York is before Det, Minn, and New Orleans is beyond me.

 

[wcb4]

good luck to you joe--appreciate you doing all that you do for mj's

 

[kosar]

Hey, sorry there GSP, but this ranks up there with the most idiotic thread I have ever seen here. And there is tons of competition. The first game, third game, looking at who comes first alphabetically? Are you people insane, actually asking sincere questions about this 'method'? Seriously. For Christs sake, I thought I had seen every last ridiculous 'angle', but this one takes the cake.

 

[kosar]

God help you guys.

Time first, home city second. Chi bulls will come before Cle if they start at the same time. I don't know why some list them in a different order.

 

[kosar]

WC, just change 'for' to 'to' and you have a good post.

-appreciate you doing all that you do for mj's

 

[Gatorbait]

little harsh.....geez

 

[Spock]

Never take sides .. . but kosar .. . joe's angles and what he contributes far outweigh whatever u may think is a ridiculous angle.

Not to say that I am following this angle since I cannot understand what exactly it is (have not read the thread completely) but its a free country .. people can come up with any angle they want . . if it works .. why ridicule ?????

are ya Questioning the IQ level of other people :nono:

Something I learnt from Captain Kirk

If U dont have ANYTHING NICE to say about/to ANYONE .. DONT SAY IT . .. .



Good luck pal . ..
Spocky

 

[kosar]

Sorry Gatorbait.

And sorry Spock.


If you guys find this 'angle' to be useful, then have at it.

 

[JEFF]

kosar, maybe I'm mistaking you for someone else, but it seems most of your posts here consist of antagonizing others. Any angle is more useful than that.

 

[Howie]

Hey, sorry there GSP, but this ranks up there with the most idiotic thread I have ever seen here. And there is tons of competition. The first game, third game, looking at who comes first alphabetically? Are you people insane, actually asking sincere questions about this 'method'? Seriously. For Christs sake, I thought I had seen every last ridiculous 'angle', but this one takes the cake.

:thefinger :withstupi

Hey Kosar...if GSP made his picks by whether or not his turds floated or sank, it would be a bigger contribution than I have ever seen you make. Here's an idea:

STFU!

Good luck GSP,

Howie

 

[kosar]

Jeff,

Unfortunately, i'm sure that a lot of people agree with you. Even if the angle is 'traditionally, the first and third games of the night go over, but if there is any sort of alphabetical anomolies, then just use your best judgment'.

Do you find anything odd about that angle, Jeff? Do find it to be an angle that is obviously totally and completely random and that maybe some of the tons of lurkers and seldom posters might just treat it with some merit?

but it seems most of your posts here consist of antagonizing others. Any angle is more useful than that.

 

[kosar]

Ok Howie, keep on keepin' on, brother! Hard to figure how sportsbooks stay in business.

:thefinger :withstupi

Hey Kosar...if GSP made his picks by whether or not his turds floated or sank, it would be a bigger contribution than I have ever seen you make. Here's an idea:

STFU!

Good luck GSP,

Howie