Wed pics

[Terryray]

well, threw up bunch of pics yesterday after worrying that my disciplined picking is leaving winners on paper. evidently not! (yesterday anyway). So trying the middle ground.


These fan attacks would reach dissapear if they had less security and let the players take care of it. Even a drunk a-hole wouldn't venture out there to pull something if he knew he'd get pounded bloody and barely live thru it.



<b> SD +124

under 9 Det/MN -104

under 9 KC/CWS -109

KC +124

under 8.5 Mets/Pitts -108</b>




Detroit's Bernero keeps putting in fine starts and keeps losing due to no run support.


For some reason, I think CWS's Garland will pitch a decent one tonight being back home now. But not good enuf to win! So keeping away from KC runline.









3-6 last yesterday, -3.57 units

that takes it to +8.20 units (36-30)

preseason MLB pics posted here: 22-10-2 (+10.29 units)

all (but one two unit so far) flat bet 1 unit risk per pic (for example, a +135 pic would pay 1.35 units, a -135 pic would pay 0.74 units).






any comments?

good luck everyone!!

 

[heleanth]

Terry, I think the way you are accounting for your units is just fine. I am just throwing this out for you to think about or to disregard, your choice.

When I place bets through Pinnacle, it is set up to automatically to bet one unit if I am betting an underdog (in your example, I would lose 1.00 units or win 1.35 units) and to bet whatever it takes to win one unit whenever I am betting a favorite (lose 1.35 units and win 1.00 units).

The reason I bring the issue up is that it seems to me that you would be betting disproportionately more on underdogs than favorites. Maybe that is the way you intended it and, if so, sorry to misunderstand.

Good luck and thanks for posting.

Mike

 

[homerh]

good luck t-ray
hope u cash in tonite