Wednesday Bases

dms79

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 16, 2010
904
33
28
Any love for BAL RL -135?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

dms79

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 16, 2010
904
33
28
Just reviewed BAL SP. Yuck, nm.

Feel like line is too short on MIL. Reviewing Refs but don?t love


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
43,893
6,363
113
Chicago, IL
Reds, under, Brew tt under
Tigs, under, twins tt under
Phillies, under, nats tt under
Orioles and over
Yanks, over, and tt over
Rangers, over, and tt over
Royals, over, and tt over
Rockies and under
Dads and under


All tonight on game, rl, and F5
 

dms79

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 16, 2010
904
33
28
Yuck, always concerns me when I?m so flames aligned with you. At least I like Boston over Rangers.

I agree with first 5 as having value but man, that?s banking on a lot of non-contenders and fading Morton, who is (and I don?t actively follow baseball day to day) this year?s Blake Snell.

Gl- I think 3-2 on first five including one +150 or higher team would be a very satisfactory outcome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
43,893
6,363
113
Chicago, IL
Yuck, always concerns me when I?m so flames aligned with you. At least I like Boston over Rangers.

I agree with first 5 as having value but man, that?s banking on a lot of non-contenders and fading Morton, who is (and I don?t actively follow baseball day to day) this year?s Blake Snell.

Gl- I think 3-2 on first five including one +150 or higher team would be a very satisfactory outcome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha - I hear you.

Texas still fighting hard. Porcello is awful, and the Red Sox pen is a dumpsterfire.

Morton - you may be right. Anytime you have a strong line against Yanks, it's a statement. I have an irrational hate of Charlie's game, and fade him way too often - so you could be right there.

Yeah, love the value on the dogs here
 

LonghornMM

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
4,584
266
83
Deer Park, TX
Jord, all due respect to you, brother. Are you playing contrarian tonight for the sake of being contrarian, when the pitching favorites at this point in the season clearly favor the favorite? These bad teams have nothing to play for. Not trying to be negative about your picks. Just wanting to understand your logic for the plays that you made.
 

rockyb

# 1 LEAF FAN
Forum Member
Apr 4, 2006
3,980
27
48
ACC
Reds, under, Brew tt under
Tigs, under, twins tt under
Phillies, under, nats tt under
Orioles and over
Yanks, over, and tt over
Rangers, over, and tt over
Royals, over, and tt over
Rockies and under
Dads and under


All tonight on game, rl, and F5

Condolences, 21 plays, and not counting RL, F5. Wow. I would love to know what kind of research you did to come up with these. Gl with the Dads
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top