Wednesday

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
ATS: 73-55-4 (+20.7)
OU: 50-45-1 (+0.3)
ML dogs: 1-5 (-3.65)


Two cool things happened last night in the NBA. We have a 100" projector screen on our wall, where we project 4 games at a time, and also have our other TV going underneath them. Well last night, the Knicks game and the Detroit game were both tied at 100-97, with under a minute to go. At the exact same time, both teams that were winning (Portland and Detroit) drained a 3 to go up 103-97. I thought that was cool - it was like some synchronized reality for a minute (I know...the small joys of life).

The other cool thing that happened was that the Clippers decided not to show up at the Pepsi Center. Thanks guys!!

I love the Warriors. They are one of my favorite teams. They are also one of my favorite teams to cap. I think they are great this year - way better than I expected. The game tonight is not only a Pacific division battle between the #1 Clippers and the #2 Warriors, but also a battle for the state of California. Who knew that these two teams would be the best in California!! It is also a battle of two of the best back courts in the league. I think these teams actually match up well, and I was surprised that the Clippers were favored. The Oracle arena is a tough loud place to play, and they are going to be super jacked up tonight, not to mention that the Clippers are coming in with no rest.

The Warriors beat the Clippers by 4 points earlier this season in LA. In that game, they won while attempting 14 less field goals than the Clippers. In that game, the Warriors bench scored 48 points, which is 14.5 above their season average, while the Clippers bench scored under their season average. I don't expect that will happen again tonight.

While it is a battle of back courts, the Clippers still have a decisive edge. They have the best backcourt in the league, both offensively and defensively. Their defensive numbers are especially impressive, holding their opponent to 39.2% on the season and posting a differential efficiency rating of 16.8 (average is 0 and the next best team is the Spurs at 9.3). The Clippers also have a better front court than Golden state, with a difference of +6.1 in ratings.

Since I bet on the Nuggets, I am happy that the Clippers decided to take a day off yesterday. That game last night was downright ugly, on both sides. The Clippers were 5-for-29 from 3-point range, a far cry from their 35-percent season average, and they were 13-for-29 from the foul line. They had 15 turnovers and shot 39% from the field. They basically did not show up. Neither team was defending particularly well, and yet neither could score either. I think the Clippers just didn?t care about that game, at all. Since the 2011 season, favorites on no rest who lost all three of these categories in their last game are 35-13 SU (+4.1 ppg) and road favorites are 16-4 SU (+3.6 ppg). Since the 2010 season, as a favorite with no rest the Clippers are 38-7 SU (+9.5 ppg) after a game where their free throw percentage was less than their season average. The Clippers are 9-1 SU (+10.4 ppg) as a favorite with no rest after a game where they shot below their season average from beyond the arc. After a game where they shot less than their average field goal percentage for the season, the Clippers are 11-4 SU (+10.1) in their last 15.

I think this is a big game for both teams, and that is why the Clippers played so poorly last night. As much as I love Golden State, I think that from top to bottom the Clippers have the edge, and they are ready to seek revenge for their earlier loss at home this season. The Clippers have the best efficiency differential in the league, and even when adjusted for their poor schedule, they are second in the league.

I won?t be surprised if the Warriors pull this one out, but I have to put money on the side of logic, not my heart.

Clippers -1.5 x2
Grizzlies -3.5
Nets +9.5
Nets ML +475 kurby


This Nets game could be a total blow-out, but I found some interesting trends that show the Nets could win. Worth the chance with the odds they are giving.

Since the plays I posted that my research indicated last night did well, I will post them again tonight. Again, I am not betting these:

Dallas
Utah
Portland


Good luck...
 
Last edited:

talos

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 21, 2009
263
6
0
This is 5th in 7. It is also 11th game for the Clippers without 2 days off. GS on 3 days rest
4-0 SU
4-0 ATS
Clippers off a physical game with Denver at elevation.
Have to ddisagree.
GL
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
This is 5th in 7. It is also 11th game for the Clippers without 2 days off. GS on 3 days rest
4-0 SU
4-0 ATS
Clippers off a physical game with Denver at elevation.
Have to ddisagree.
GL

Thank you for your response. I enjoy and encourage a good discourse.

That is a good point about the Clippers schedule and rest. As far as the Warriors, I don't think that 4 games is a really good sample of how a team performs on 3 days rest, and if you look before that, the numbers are not so great. Also, I try to base my trends on more than one parameter, for example - were they at home, were they a dog, is their opponent rested, etc.

I don't think that was a really physical game last night, at least not from what I saw. Both teams were dogging it the whole game. Maybe the Clippers are exhausted - I would not be surprised, but they just looked like they didn't care last night.

Since the 2010 season, away favorites after playing at Denver are 13-2 SU (+7 ppg) and 11-4 ATS. Who knows, maybe they got some real conditioning...

I won't be surprised if the Warriors win this game, even if they win it large. But I think there is enough information and the Clippers have enough drive to want to win this game.

But again, if you find a better angle, please play the other side. Cheers
 

WildBillPicks7

Move the line! I double dog dare you!!
Forum Member
May 4, 2005
28,551
1,342
113
65
Bellevue, Nebraska
ATS: 73-55-4 (+20.7)
OU: 50-45-1 (+0.3)
ML dogs: 1-5 (-3.65)


Two cool things happened last night in the NBA. We have a 100" projector screen on our wall, where we project 4 games at a time, and also have our other TV going underneath them. Well last night, the Knicks game and the Detroit game were both tied at 100-97, with under a minute to go. At the exact same time, both teams that were winning (Portland and Detroit) drained a 3 to go up 103-97. I thought that was cool - it was like some synchronized reality for a minute (I know...the small joys of life).

The other cool thing that happened was that the Clippers decided not to show up at the Pepsi Center. Thanks guys!!

I love the Warriors. They are one of my favorite teams. They are also one of my favorite teams to cap. I think they are great this year - way better than I expected. The game tonight is not only a Pacific division battle between the #1 Clippers and the #2 Warriors, but also a battle for the state of California. Who knew that these two teams would be the best in California!! It is also a battle of two of the best back courts in the league. I think these teams actually match up well, and I was surprised that the Clippers were favored. The Oracle arena is a tough loud place to play, and they are going to be super jacked up tonight, not to mention that the Clippers are coming in with no rest.

The Warriors beat the Clippers by 4 points earlier this season in LA. In that game, they won while attempting 14 less field goals than the Clippers. Since the 2009 season, teams that attempted 14 or more field goals in the previous game vs. the same opponent and are playing as a home dog are 11-30 SU (-5.7 ppg) and 16-25 ATS. In that game, the Warriors bench scored 48 points, which is 14.5 above their season average, while the Clippers bench scored under their season average. I don't expect that will happen again tonight. Teams after winning on the road and playing at home as a dog vs. the same opponent who has no rest are 18-31 (-3.4 ppg) since the 2006 season.

While it is a battle of back courts, the Clippers still have a decisive edge. They have the best backcourt in the league, both offensively and defensively. Their defensive numbers are especially impressive, holding their opponent to 39.2% on the season and posting a differential efficiency rating of 16.8 (average is 0 and the next best team is the Spurs at 9.3). The Clippers also have a better front court than Golden state, with a difference of +6.1 in ratings.

Since I bet on the Nuggets, I am happy that the Clippers decided to take a day off yesterday. That game last night was downright ugly, on both sides. The Clippers were 5-for-29 from 3-point range, a far cry from their 35-percent season average, and they were 13-for-29 from the foul line. They had 15 turnovers and shot 39% from the field. They basically did not show up. Neither team was defending particularly well, and yet neither could score either. I think the Clippers just didn?t care about that game, at all. Since the 2011 season, favorites on no rest who lost all three of these categories in their last game are 35-13 SU (+4.1 ppg) and road favorites are 16-4 SU (+3.6 ppg). Since the 2010 season, as a favorite with no rest the Clippers are 38-7 SU (+9.5 ppg) after a game where their free throw percentage was less than their season average. The Clippers are 9-1 SU (+10.4 ppg) as a favorite with no rest after a game where they shot below their season average from beyond the arc. After a game where they shot less than their average field goal percentage for the season, the Clippers are 11-4 SU (+10.1) in their last 15.

Teams as a road favorite off a loss that broke a 10+ game winning streak are 29-11 SU (+6.8 ppg) and 23-15 ATS. I think this is a big game for both teams, and that is why the Clippers played so poorly last night. As much as I love Golden State, I think that from top to bottom the Clippers have the edge, and they are ready to seek revenge for their earlier loss at home this season. Teams seeking same season revenge for home loss as road favorite since 2009 season are 68-29 SU (+4.7) and 59-35 ATS. The Clippers have the best efficiency differential in the league, and even when adjusted for their poor schedule, they are second in the league.

Since the 2005 season, teams playing away in the regular season as a favorite against a divisional foe after an away loss are 57-17 SU (+7.4 ppg) and 50-24 ATS. I won?t be surprised if the Warriors pull this one out, but I have to put money on the side of logic, not my heart.

Clippers -1.5 x2
Grizzlies -3.5
Nets +9.5
Nets ML +475 kurby


This Nets game could be a total blow-out, but I found some interesting trends that show the Nets could win. Worth the chance with the odds they are giving.

Since the plays I posted that my research indicated last night did well, I will post them again tonight. Again, I am not betting these:

Dallas
Utah
Portland


Good luck...

GL Hippo!! Nice call on Denver last night!!

:0074
 

hedman

Paid Poster
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2004
2,292
140
0
SouthDakota
So thanks to you I'm sitting here with $100 on the Nets money line at +450 and $250 straight. Question is how much should I hedge at halftime? Right now they are up 57-40 with 2 minutes left.

Thoughts and THANK YOU!!
 

hedman

Paid Poster
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2004
2,292
140
0
SouthDakota
So up 16 at break.

Thunder -9.5. I put $385 to win $350 on Thunder second half.

Here is to a NETS win by 6 or less for the SCOOP.

Thanks Again.
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
So thanks to you I'm sitting here with $100 on the Nets money line at +450 and $250 straight. Question is how much should I hedge at halftime? Right now they are up 57-40 with 2 minutes left.

Thoughts and THANK YOU!!

Hey - sorry, I was not around my computer last night. Glad you could win some money on the Nets - what a game! I thought they were going to blow it in the third, but Joe Johnson stepped up huge for them.

I don't hedge bets. Think about it this way - if someone offered you a bet of $100 to win $450 at halftime and they gave you a line of +16, would you take it? HELL YES! And if they offered you a straight bet of $250 getting +25.5 at halftime, would you take it? HELL YES! So why hedge? But I think that it is just a personal philosophy - some people do, and some don't. For me, I would rather take my chances and win big, and absorb some bad beats in the end too. But the chances of Oklahoma coming back and covering that spread were slim, so no matter what you were likely to win money.

That said, Brooklyn is a horrible horrific no good very bad second half team, and there was probably a good chance for you to cash both. Again, I think it is just personal preference, but glad you could make some money on that one!
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
That sounds absolutely awesome.

Yes, I am spoiled...

18kl6w.jpg





That Clippers game was a bad pick, sorry to all for that one, and glad a lot of you could cash the other side. Warriors doing work!
 

Hamster

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 4, 2000
1,936
39
48
70
Sacramento, CA
"That Clippers game was a bad pick, sorry to all for that one, and glad a lot of you could cash the other side. Warriors doing work!"

No apologies needed. Your handicapping is solid with good supporting data.
 

hedman

Paid Poster
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2004
2,292
140
0
SouthDakota
Yeah, I like the way you think about it. For me sometimes the GREED of the middle overcomes common sense, like last night. However, +315 on a game I would have never bet is not bad.

Love the set up.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top