ARE YOU KIDDING ME?....NO WALKER AND BUCKS ONLY MINUS TWO...WITHOUT WALKER YOUR ALMOST MISSING A DOUBLE DOUBLE IN POINTS AND BOARDS...YOU ALSO ALLOWING THE DEFENSE TO FOCUS ON PIERCE A LOT MORE...UNLESS SOMEONE STEPS UP FOR THE C'S THIS COULD GET UGLY EARLY..
I KNOW WHEN A KEY PLAYER GOES OUT WE TEND TO PUT TOO MUCH INTO HIS LOSS AND THE TEAM OFTEN FOCUS' MORE AND PLAYS AS A TEAM....BUT THIS CELTS TEAM IS THIN AS IT IS...BATTIE OUT/DELK HURTING...BREMER HAS STEPPED UP NICELY AND THEY ARE ON A NICE LITTLE RUN BUT I THINK YOUR ASKING WAY TOO MUCH FROM THIS TEAM TO WIN TONGHT WITHOUT WALKER...
NOT TOO MENTION PRIOR TO LAST SAT WIN AT MILWAK THIS WAS A TOUGH MATCHUP FOR THE C'S AS THE ROSTERS WERE...
1.) BUCKS MINUS 2
COOZ
I KNOW WHEN A KEY PLAYER GOES OUT WE TEND TO PUT TOO MUCH INTO HIS LOSS AND THE TEAM OFTEN FOCUS' MORE AND PLAYS AS A TEAM....BUT THIS CELTS TEAM IS THIN AS IT IS...BATTIE OUT/DELK HURTING...BREMER HAS STEPPED UP NICELY AND THEY ARE ON A NICE LITTLE RUN BUT I THINK YOUR ASKING WAY TOO MUCH FROM THIS TEAM TO WIN TONGHT WITHOUT WALKER...
NOT TOO MENTION PRIOR TO LAST SAT WIN AT MILWAK THIS WAS A TOUGH MATCHUP FOR THE C'S AS THE ROSTERS WERE...
1.) BUCKS MINUS 2
COOZ

