Week 4

Valuist

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 21, 2001
2,314
0
0
63
Mt. Prospect, IL
Last week was big w/a 6-0 slate on posted games. This week looks tougher; esp. the sides.

BUFF -3 The Bears 2nd game now w/out their 3 injured defensive starters. One DT, a DE and their best cover CB. Buffalo should be able to exploit this. The questions is, can Buff stop the Bears? OC Shoop may have to deviate from the conservatism.

Chi/Buff OVER 44--Expecting the Bears to throw more vs Buff, and Bledsoe and Buff WRs should be effective.

KC +3 the line does seem a little low and I expect it to be 3.5 by gametime. I'm waiting as long as possible to try to get 3.5. The Chiefs qualify under Steele's Defensive Bounceback angle. Any team that allows 40 or more pts that is a home dog the following week is 43-18 ATS since 1987 in that situation. The reasoning is that the coaches and players know that severe breakdowns occured the previous week, and will put forth extra effort to correct them.

J-VILLE -3. I don't know how people were high on the Jets this year. They are a bad football team, an old football team, and a team in need of a major overhaul. As long as Fred Taylor is healthy, the Jags can move the ball, esp against a weak run defense like NYs.

CLEVE +6 Cleve has done very well throwing the ball this year and Pitt will have to prove they can stop it. Until then, if they are playing a team that is passing oriented, they must be faded. Pitt should be able to move the ball against a subpar run defense so both offenses are going against the others weaknesses so the over is looking tempting also.

Mia/KC Under 44 Both teams like to run the ball and are good at doing it, so the clock should keep moving. KC's defense is shaky enough to dampen my enthusiasm, but I'm expecting some sort of bounceback from them.
 

Valuist

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 21, 2001
2,314
0
0
63
Mt. Prospect, IL
adding one more total:

NE/San Diego UNDER 41

41 is a key number so if you like the under play it now before it falls. In 2 of their 3 games, NE's offense was virtually all passing, and they only ran on the Jets because it was a blowout, and the Jets can't stop the run. No way do they go one dimensional this week but the only problem is San Diego is tough against the run: they've held opponents to under 100 yds rushing in all 3 games and last year limited opponents to 3.4 ypc. As for NE's defense, they are vulnerable against the run; 4.9 against this season and 4.3 against last season. Tomlinson figures to get a lot of carries.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
124
Toronto, ON, Canada
Hey Valuist,

Very nice writeups. You make some good points and I had fairly strong leans on most of the plays you have taken. Clev, Buf and Buf Over will be plays for me I am pretty sure. Jax...ya, considering them too, though I'm just not keen on the line.

The game I can't quite picture in my head is Mia/KC. Both teams have shown they can crank up the offence, and KC's D is shaky. You may be right that last week serves as a wakeup call, but I'm wondering if the Chiefs really have it in them to contend with the much-improved Dolphin O. On the other hand, you've got two great clock killers in this game, Ricky Williams and Priest Holmes. If both teams keep it on the ground the Under looks better, but I'm still not convinced this is the way the game will go. I could see Miami going for the quick strike early, building a 10 or 14-point lead...then handing it to Ricky for the whole 2nd Half... conservative play, escape with a road win. Really not sure though; I think I'll have to pass on this game.

Hope the rest of your picks come in though, cause I like 'em all a LOT.

Good luck,
Greg
 

Valuist

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 21, 2001
2,314
0
0
63
Mt. Prospect, IL
GM--

I like the total better than the side also but home doggies are always dangerous. Arrowhead is probably the loudest outdoor venue in the NFL. Miami has looked great so far but they haven't really played under pressure at all yet. They destroyed Det and the Jets, and had a sizeable lead against Indy until the Colts came alive in the 4th quarter. Also, virtually everyone on the well known tracking services is on Miami; that is never a good sign.
 

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
I think you are onto something with BUFFALO. !!!


im not crazy about The Jags.. i smell a big rat with those Jets. i'll pass on that game..

Thanks alot good luck:grins:
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
124
Toronto, ON, Canada
True, KC's looking like the ugly dog pick of the week. Miami scares me though. Ya, they haven't really played anyone yet, but they've played well regardless, and I am starting to really be sold on this team. Ricky seems to have changed the entire dynamic of the offence...Fiedler's got more passing options with defences having to key on the running threat. Hard to bet against that until I see that someone can stop them.

Just the fact that the public is on Miami heavy though....good point. Yet another reason to pass. LOL
 

Valuist

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 21, 2001
2,314
0
0
63
Mt. Prospect, IL
6-1 this week so far and 12-1 the last two weeks.

Denver -7.5

I realize normally you don't lay more than a TD on the road on Monday night but we don't fully know just how bad this Baltimore team is. Right now the AFC West is on a roll, and its hard to go against them here.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top