unreal ending to that fucking sickening game
gjn23 Registered User Forum Member Mar 20, 2002 9,319 45 48 55 So. Cal Jan 14, 2013 #1 unreal ending to that fucking sickening game
yyz Under .500 Forum Member Mar 16, 2000 43,968 2,500 113 On the course! Jan 14, 2013 #2 No, they got it right. Called it "late".
gjn23 Registered User Forum Member Mar 20, 2002 9,319 45 48 55 So. Cal Jan 14, 2013 #3 yyz said: No, they got it right. Called it "late". Click to expand... they fucking better have 8 points in 20 seconds of a 17 point game with 3 chances to run the clock out, 2 missed rebounds and a layup 2 seconds after the buzzer
yyz said: No, they got it right. Called it "late". Click to expand... they fucking better have 8 points in 20 seconds of a 17 point game with 3 chances to run the clock out, 2 missed rebounds and a layup 2 seconds after the buzzer
yyz Under .500 Forum Member Mar 16, 2000 43,968 2,500 113 On the course! Jan 14, 2013 #4 gjn23 said: they fucking better have 8 points in 20 seconds of a 17 point game with 3 chances to run the clock out, 2 missed rebounds and a layup 2 seconds after the buzzer Click to expand... It was never in doubt. I needed the bucket. :mj07:
gjn23 said: they fucking better have 8 points in 20 seconds of a 17 point game with 3 chances to run the clock out, 2 missed rebounds and a layup 2 seconds after the buzzer Click to expand... It was never in doubt. I needed the bucket. :mj07:
Mr. Poon Sugar? Forum Member Jan 14, 2006 13,160 209 0 Colorado Jan 14, 2013 #5 yyz said: No, they got it right. Called it "late". Click to expand... Was expecting to read about someone that had the over be all mad because they didn't count it. Impressed that there is actually an impartial view on a close call when someone got the loss.
yyz said: No, they got it right. Called it "late". Click to expand... Was expecting to read about someone that had the over be all mad because they didn't count it. Impressed that there is actually an impartial view on a close call when someone got the loss.
B Bisket23 Registered User Forum Member Jun 27, 2006 1,565 48 48 Jan 14, 2013 #7 espn.com now showing 133 points
Mr. Poon Sugar? Forum Member Jan 14, 2006 13,160 209 0 Colorado Jan 14, 2013 #8 Bisket23 said: espn.com now showing 133 points Click to expand... I see that, 5dimes had already graded the Unders as winners. Will be interesting to see if they reverse it.
Bisket23 said: espn.com now showing 133 points Click to expand... I see that, 5dimes had already graded the Unders as winners. Will be interesting to see if they reverse it.
B Bisket23 Registered User Forum Member Jun 27, 2006 1,565 48 48 Jan 14, 2013 #9 but the scoreboard page has 131
whodey Registered Forum Member Aug 11, 2011 1,191 19 38 Jan 14, 2013 #10 on the box score they show 1h 2h Total Lou 28 45 73 Conn 34 24 60 lol so they scores add up to 132... but the total says 133... what the fuck
on the box score they show 1h 2h Total Lou 28 45 73 Conn 34 24 60 lol so they scores add up to 132... but the total says 133... what the fuck
Mr. Poon Sugar? Forum Member Jan 14, 2006 13,160 209 0 Colorado Jan 14, 2013 #11 changed back to 131 now. This is more interesting than the game was.
