Who are you a fan of and What Your perception of your team's 2006 Outlook?

ballsweat

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2000
616
2
18
Las Vegas, NV USA
I will post mine soon. As an SC fan there are many wild cards and many losses to replace. I also will not be able to post as thorough analysis of the one that Scott will post.

Try to be honest and if possible, overly biased in your team's favor. All teams have flaws, some more than others. Try to account for your team's schedule and also make a prediction on your regular season record.

This seems like a simple request and hopefully will not turn into personal squabbles and bashing back and forth.

Lets make a goal of getting 5 teams posted before the attacks start on each other's teams.
 

jpblack34

Snap Hook
Forum Member
Sep 24, 2002
750
4
0
44
Texas
Oklahoma "Land Thieves", credit Sun for that name.

My perception is this. Bomar had a .500 percentage in high school for a reason. He's just not the greatest. Paul Thompson isn't either. We are going to compete every year because Oklahoma is a name again and we get great recruits. Bob Stoops is a good coach. Mike Stoops is a great coach. Our D-coordinator Venables is good, but Mike was the key to how good we were. When we get a great d coordinator like Mike, we'll win another NC. Feel free to rip, just my opinion. BTW, nice topic for the off-season. Hope it doesn't turn into a bash thread. JP
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Virgina Tech

I love Virginia Techs odds this year to have another steller season. They have an outstanding defense returning many of their #1 defensive passing core. And their run stopping defense is almost as good and only getting more mature. But even If VT had a bunch of scrubs they have the best offseason workout coach in college. I have posted many times that Beamer has closed his practices off from other coaches because they were ALL showing up and he felt like it was too much of an advantage. So VT will be great on D no question. Special Teams as well, especially with Royal returning!

Losing Vick is for the better because he has a TO attitude with lil of the impact or skill. Hes just trouble and blew up in every big game last year. But it remains to be seen who will step up, maybe another no name like Randall was.

Offensively they will probably struggle but they run the ball well and have good recievers, OLine will be an issue. Easy schedule especially out of conference. They will be in another bowl next year. But with Miami and FSU it is tough to say they will get into a BCS game like they should have this year. Probably will be betting unders on these guys once conference starts.

Thanks for starting this thread and lets shoot for 8 seperate teams before the bashers come.
 

Hokie Fan

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2003
1,357
2
0
blgstacks
Didnt know you were a Hokie guy..
Alright!!!!
Tough trips to BC and Miami but winnable..
Who will be the QB..
Defense looks good though..
Offensive should be great too...
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Hokie Fan said:
blgstacks
Didnt know you were a Hokie guy..
Alright!!!!
Tough trips to BC and Miami but winnable..
Who will be the QB..
Defense looks good though..
Offensive should be great too...
Yeah I have been a hokie guy for sometime. Besides Imoh, why do you think Offense will be great? Or is that reason enough. He is a very solid and underated back IMO

And about BC I never really give them any credit, I geuss cause its like they never win a big 1 and everytime I bet on them I seem to lose, so thats prolly why i didnt include them in the analysis, but agree with you totally that they are winnable
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top