Just realized places like CNN, Fox, Washington Post, USA Today, New York Times - not a hint of the potential Kerry intern scandal. Not even a whiff. Not having a 110% concrete story has NEVER stopped these outlets from running with stories. Is this a coincidence? They have had days and hundreds of pages of Bush's National Guard service and his rumored misdoings there - which I admit stinks to high hell. The New York Times has 3 articles today on it, most of which say the papers were released, we learned nothing new. Three articles on it. I think if Bush even whiffed of something like this it would be all over the front page. But the whole press-bias debate aside, doesnt anyone else find this odd?? Ive never, ever bought into that argument of the left leaning media even though I am right leaning myself, but not one front page byte that I can see on the Keary/intern thing? Certainly this story has legs to stand on right now, including Dean potentially backing out of his pledge to drop out of the race after Wisconsin because he knew this story might break. There are too many little pieces coming out and not one site is going to take a stab at this? Not even a mention of it and stating that its not true. Not many people thought the Monica Lewinsky story was true either at first.
Whats up with that?
Whats up with that?
Last edited:

