will either team score 3 times in a row-no(+145 at olympic)

[gardenweasel]

will one team score 3 times in a row(without the other team scoring)"no" +145 at oly............ not on 3 straight possessions...just 3 times in a row before the other team scores....this looks to be a close,hard fought game....i think at +145 it`s a decent prop....thanks wizzah at the rx...

 

[bej0101]

very tough to win at this prop

 

[THE HITMAN]

+155 @ Pinnacle
But, I agree with bej.......over time, it is tough to skin this prop. Hope it hits tonite for you

 

[gardenweasel]

thanks,hitter

thanks,hitter

just a small play...

 

[genosays]

Does that prop include extra points???

 

[THE HITMAN]

No, geno, no XP's count

 

[Allnet]

06:05 PM Yes -165 @ Pinnacle, 6:50PM cst

Very interesting, what the hell is going on here?????

 

[IX_Bender]

Allnet, I believe he is betting "NO" team will score 3 consecutive times @+145

The "YES" is -165.


Its typical to have a 15-20 difference in vig here.

Hope that clears things up.

 

[Allnet]

All I need to know is, who is going to score 3 consecutive times, and I will have the winner.

 

[Allnet]

Got ya--thanks , I need to put my specs on. No seems reasonable to me.

 

[the_fix_is_on]

I've followed this bet over the years and you'd be surprised how scores seem to come in bunches by one side or the other. That's why you have to pay to play the "Yes". It happens more than you realize. Good luck if you want to take a stab at it though. This could be an evenly played game where neither team gets on a roll.

 

[UT-Longhorn]

Here is a prop that hits more than that one..........

YES -220 There will be a score in the final two mins of the first half......i gotta buddy that works at the stardust and you would be amazed how many people take the NO, and lose week in and week out......that is the ONLY one he and his co-workers hit regularly on the big marquee games......(sunday nite and monday nite)

 

[gardenweasel]

guys

guys

just a small play for chits and giggles....figured to be a hard fought ballgame....no biggie....

 

[THE HITMAN]

Fix is right on. The First glance looks like a "no" is a no brainer, but it is not. You almost have to figure that it is only 2 scores, because one team always has the "last "score which is the first the first of 3 needed. So, you are always in a position of one team needing the next two for you to lose.
If the game spread were higher, the "No "would rise accordingly. I have seen some +170's & a few +180's.
It is a nasty ass prop to hit on a steady basis.
GL.............THE HITMAN

 

[gardenweasel]

cha-ching

cha-ching

hope some others cashed this little bet....thanks to all who gave a little POSITIVE feedback......g.l.

 

[THE HITMAN]

GOOD WIN, WEASEL. THINGS FELL RIGHT INTO PLACE, EVEN THE NE TD WHICH THE REFS HELPED THEM WITH. SORRY, DIDN'T MEAN TO GIVE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK............I JUST WANTED TO OFFER SOME INSIGHT INTO MY EXPERIENCES WITH THAT PARTICULAR PROP. IT JUST APPEARS EASIER THAN IT IS TO HIT. UT HAS A POINT WITH THE SCORE AT THE END OF THE HALF, ANOTHER PROP THAT LOOKS LIKE A NO AT FIRST GLANCE. GL AND CHA CHING TO YOU.

 

[gardenweasel]

hitter

hitter

i`m pretty sure you are hitman from rx...i`m sphincter....i wasn`t addressing you.....and i don`t mind a little negativity....everybody`s entitled to their own opinion.....i know you`re a solid guy....g.l my friend...

 

[UT-Longhorn]

MY prop was a winner again as well!

 

[gardenweasel]

congrats,ut

congrats,ut

 

[THE HITMAN]

weasel........sorry, but I am not hitman from rx. I hope that doesn't mean that I am not a solid guy, tho !! GL