WMD's found

Kdogg21

who?
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2001
5,364
0
0
48
Chicago,IL
Looking for WMD? 8 million chemical weapons exist

September 27, 2004

BY CHARLES J. HANLEY

They were no-shows in Iraq, but tons of chemical weapons are stoking fears and costing billions to clean up elsewhere in the world -- from concrete ''igloos'' in Oregon, to the Panama rainforest, to the highlands of China, where Japanese war leftovers reportedly have killed hundreds.

In fact, more chemical munitions have turned up lately in Australia than in Iraq, where the Bush administration claimed up to 500 tons would be found. As Baghdad arms hunters searched in vain, chemical weapons material was even being unearthed in Washington, four miles from the White House.

At least 8 million such weapons are stockpiled worldwide, and concern is deepening not only over the health and safety of nearby communities, but also over the threat of theft or attacks on depots brimming with sarin or VX, fearsome nerve agents.

''Chemical terrorism is something we should all be very concerned about,'' chief international watchdog Rogelio Pfirter said. His OPCW, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, oversees destruction of the armaments under a 1997 treaty.

As troubling as the terror potential is, ''these weapons are leaking and pose a threat even without terrorist involvement,'' said Jonathan Tucker, a Monterey Institute specialist in unconventional arms. ''The sooner we get rid of them, the better.''

AP
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
It is interesting to note that some 60 years after WWII, these dangerous weapons are surfacing in places like Australia and China. It has evidently taken years to find them. Perhaps they were hidden.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
91
CORCORAN, CA
300,000 mass graves uncovered so far in Iraq. A genocide.

Bush already found the Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Their names were Uzi, Quasi, and Saddam Hussein.

:)
 

pirate fan

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2002
880
1
18
Kdogg, appreciate the report although I'm not sold that there were no chemical weapons used. Haven't we had the same troubles finding things, ie: bodies in other places in the world where there have been mass killings? I know estimates vary widely in how many people actually died in places like Cambodia or Rawanda (750,000 - 1.25 million). We can't get free access to these places to truly find out the truth. I honestly hope that those 100,000 people never died in Iraq, but based on other things I've read, I fear the worst.
 

Trossi3389

% MAN !!!!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2003
1,903
5
0
55
rochester ny
CHARLESMANSON said:
300,000 mass graves uncovered so far in Iraq. A genocide.

Bush already found the Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Their names were Uzi, Quasi, and Saddam Hussein.

:)

thats right!!! :yup
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Now were up to 300000 in Iraq from the original 30000. Heck just add a zero. But in Suddan where we know the numbers are over 300000 we watch and talk about it. Not enough oil there to worry. And so far in Iraq we found zero. Don't walk around parts of Nam and Cambodia. We dropped over 300 million little jumpers and daises. They will take you apart. Russia has over thirty nukes they can't account for. Hell there over 10000 chemical plants and storage outlets with out any protection and thats here in the USA. We need to take care of things here at home. Were spending the money in the wrong country.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
91
CORCORAN, CA
Nobody added a zero Einstein...you conveniently removed one. Doesn't even matter.
And Yes we do need to take care of things at home. We need to keep the battle off of our soil, so we are safe to go online each day, and debate, and bet on sports! We have taken the battle to the enemy.
30,000 dead bodies was only from when Saddam used WMDs on the Kurds in the north. 300,000 mass graves have been found in all of Iraq. If you don't want to believe it fine. Facts are facts. The holocaust never existed either right djv?
You can try and downplay Saddam's murderous toresome reign all you want. That's what you libeers do.
Even if it was only 30,000 people exterminated, like you say lol, I would call that genocide wouldn't you djv?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top