Both are -3 -110 But ML are UCLA -170 A&M -150 :shrug:
D Dr. Fade Colllector Forum Member Sep 29, 2005 1,476 17 0 Kansas City Mar 22, 2007 #1 Both are -3 -110 But ML are UCLA -170 A&M -150 :shrug:
R RTL Winner Forum Member Sep 17, 2002 1,032 0 0 The Winner's Circle Mar 22, 2007 #3 Because UCLA is going to lose straight up!
D Dr. Fade Colllector Forum Member Sep 29, 2005 1,476 17 0 Kansas City Mar 22, 2007 #4 RTL said: Because UCLA is going to lose straight up! Click to expand... If that were the case they would have UCLA @ -150- I took the Bruins on the ML @ -160. Superior team - PAC 10
RTL said: Because UCLA is going to lose straight up! Click to expand... If that were the case they would have UCLA @ -150- I took the Bruins on the ML @ -160. Superior team - PAC 10
R RTL Winner Forum Member Sep 17, 2002 1,032 0 0 The Winner's Circle Mar 22, 2007 #5 Wrong, the book is going to get action on the UCLA ML whether it's -170 or -150. Why not collect an extra $20 from everyone who bets on the Bruins, and believe me, there are a lot of them out there! RTL
Wrong, the book is going to get action on the UCLA ML whether it's -170 or -150. Why not collect an extra $20 from everyone who bets on the Bruins, and believe me, there are a lot of them out there! RTL
D Dr. Fade Colllector Forum Member Sep 29, 2005 1,476 17 0 Kansas City Mar 22, 2007 #6 3-0 so far Hoping for 7-0 w/UCLA ML, OV 44.5 Ten, UN 123 UCLA, Ten +5 Whats up RTL? Last edited: Mar 22, 2007
R RTL Winner Forum Member Sep 17, 2002 1,032 0 0 The Winner's Circle Mar 23, 2007 #8 Nice call Doctor!