Your Local News May Be Changing

[WhatsHisNuts]

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GvtNyOzGogc" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Sinclair Broadcast Group is buying up local news outlets and adding that bias you guys love to talk about.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-with-a-growing-reach/?utm_term=.3e151ed4591c

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How America's largest local TV owner turned its news anchors into soldiers in Trump's war on the media: <a href="https://t.co/iLVtKRQycL">https://t.co/iLVtKRQycL</a> <a href="https://t.co/dMdSGellH3">pic.twitter.com/dMdSGellH3</a></p>— Deadspin (@Deadspin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/980175772206993409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In response to the Sinclair message aired: "WMSN/FOX47 Madison did not air the Sinclair promotional announcement during our 9pm news this weekend. Rather, we stayed true to our commitment to provide our Madison area viewers local news, weather and sports of interest to them." <a href="https://t.co/MdQ568cWrH">pic.twitter.com/MdQ568cWrH</a></p>— FOX 47 Madison (@fox47madison) <a href="https://twitter.com/fox47madison/status/980943337589964805?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[ChrryBlstr]

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GvtNyOzGogc" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Sinclair Broadcast Group is buying up local news outlets and adding that bias you guys love to talk about.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-with-a-growing-reach/?utm_term=.3e151ed4591c

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How America's largest local TV owner turned its news anchors into soldiers in Trump's war on the media: <a href="https://t.co/iLVtKRQycL">https://t.co/iLVtKRQycL</a> <a href="https://t.co/dMdSGellH3">pic.twitter.com/dMdSGellH3</a></p>— Deadspin (@Deadspin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/980175772206993409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Even more problematic is that aside from Sinclair owning these stations (information most are unfamiliar with), all of the networks including ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox are all under the same umbrella.

So, for those who insist on "liberal media" and "liberal bias in the news" - once again, there is no such thing. Herman & Chomsky explained this with Manufacturing Consent and their development of the 5 filters of the media years ago!

Peace!

 

[Duff Miver]

Any broadcaster which is supported by paid advertising dispenses propaganda at the whim of the advertisers.

So, where do you turn for truthful news reporting?

PBS is probably the best, although they are limited by their budget. They accept no advertising, and the list of donors who support PBS is the first thing you seen when PBS news comes on the air for the evening news.

Regardless what the lying cocksucker in the White House says, the NYT and Washing Post can be relied on as almost unbiased, as can The Atlantic magazine.

But any network which is supported by advertisers is suspect. Fox is, of course, the worst. Just watch Sean Hannity one time and count the number of lies and "fake news" he spreads. He's a human manure spreader.

Shit in his head, diarrhea out of his mouth.

 

[Skulnik]

Any broadcaster which is supported by paid advertising dispenses propaganda at the whim of the advertisers.

So, where do you turn for truthful news reporting?

PBS is probably the best, although they are limited by their budget. They accept no advertising, and the list of donors who support PBS is the first thing you seen when PBS news comes on the air for the evening news.

Regardless what the lying cocksucker in the White House says, the NYT and Washing Post can be relied on as almost unbiased, as can The Atlantic magazine.

But any network which is supported by advertisers is suspect. Fox is, of course, the worst. Just watch Sean Hannity one time and count the number of lies and "fake news" he spreads. He's a human manure spreader.

Shit in his head, diarrhea out of his mouth.

Larry Sinclair, any relation?

Obama is the lying COCK SUCKER.

Just so yo know

 

[Skulnik]

Any broadcaster which is supported by paid advertising dispenses propaganda at the whim of the advertisers.

So, where do you turn for truthful news reporting?

PBS is probably the best, although they are limited by their budget. They accept no advertising, and the list of donors who support PBS is the first thing you seen when PBS news comes on the air for the evening news.

Regardless what the lying cocksucker in the White House says, the NYT and Washing Post can be relied on as almost unbiased, as can The Atlantic magazine.

But any network which is supported by advertisers is suspect. Fox is, of course, the worst. Just watch Sean Hannity one time and count the number of lies and "fake news" he spreads. He's a human manure spreader.

Shit in his head, diarrhea out of his mouth.

Duff, do you watch or listen to Hannity or are you a LYING COCK SUCKER?

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Sean Hannity is a political entertainment show. Dumb people can't tell the difference which is why a lot of Fox News viewers are so confused. It's also why they think the rest of the media is so biased. They turn on a channel with a pundit that says something they disagree with and, since they don't understand the difference, they think it is that channel's reporting of the news. It's just easier to go to the echo chamber and let people tell you what you want to hear.